Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION V > Civ5 - General Discussions > Civ - Ideas & Suggestions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 10, 2012, 01:09 PM   #21
historix69
Warlord
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 174
I didn't read all the postings, just the op.

Recently I played a Civ5 mod where I tweaked the following :
- City attack range = 0 (cities can only defend)
- unit hit points 10 -> 20
- city hit points 30 -> 100
(+ other changes to buildings, science costs, etc.)

I enjoyed the game (on Giant Earth Map) very much. The AI founded hundreds of cities and used them as kind of Forts, most with a wall and a ranged unit inside. The AI was not able to capture more than a few cities during the whole game but was almost permanently on war with each other. There was no run-away civ. All civs stayed alive until the end of game. It felt very historical with all these small and medium sized civs around me. In normal games most civs are eliminated soon and continents turn into single-colored empires.

I suppose that making cities weaker will accelerate the run-away-process and will lead to early elimination of most civs.

Strong cities are definitely not historical but single-colored huge continents are also not historical.
historix69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2012, 01:30 PM   #22
Atwork
Immortal
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA.
Posts: 434
Quote:
Strong cities are definitely not historical
Hmmmm....dunno how you come to that conclusion.
Atwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2012, 03:56 PM   #23
historix69
Warlord
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 174
Strong cities lead to a game where cities cannot be conquered by the AI while in real history many cities including Athene, Rome, Carthage, Berlin, Alexandria, Babylon were conquered.

On the other side conquering cities in Civ5 is not historical since the conquered cities do not have the option to revolt and become independent again except when they are conquered by a third power which chooses to release them. Huge empires are too robust. In Civ5 Europe would probably be part of the Roman Empire for 2.500 years.
historix69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 06, 2013, 12:08 AM   #24
killmeplease
Tsar
 
killmeplease's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Samara, Russia
Posts: 1,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atwork View Post
But, they're not repressing the people. They're emergency defense folks. Therefore, I don't think they should affect happiness, unless they were capable of reducing war weariness (which isn't presently a part of C5).
just name them guards, not militia.
guards were used to enforse laws as well as to defend a city. and they didnt just suppress riots but secure ppl from criminals which led to rise of wealth.
it think giving a guard specialist yields like +1 (or even 2) local happiness and +1 gold would make a perfect sence and make defensive buildings more valuable too.
killmeplease is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 07, 2013, 10:31 AM   #25
steveg700
King
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 928
EDIT--Just realized that someone's necromancing.

Last edited by steveg700; Mar 07, 2013 at 10:37 AM.
steveg700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 07, 2013, 10:34 AM   #26
steveg700
King
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 928
EDIT--Just realized that someone's necromancing.

Last edited by steveg700; Mar 07, 2013 at 10:37 AM.
steveg700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 08, 2013, 11:24 PM   #27
Targe
Chieftain
 
Targe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
Everyone is ignoring history. Untrained citizens are worthless against trained troops. Cities often fell without a shot fired, they surrendered en mass, at the first sign of the enemy.
I think undefended cities with no units should have zero combat ability. Should be captured immediately. To compeccompensate, give zero maint cost for garrisoned units, and allow limited stacking in cities.
Targe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 09, 2013, 02:21 AM   #28
alpha wolf 64
Byte me
 
alpha wolf 64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison of Cheeseland
Posts: 644
I would like to keep things as simple as possible.

City starts at 5 defense points.
Gets 5 (4 if puppet) more for each 10 in population, representing police, militia.
defensive buildings add a set amount, so maybe 5 for walls, 10 for castle, etc.
damage to attackers is like a citadel. range increases to 3 upon getting artillery.
land units in city get their full value added to defense. general adds 25.

nice and simple and fits with the way the game currently works.
alpha wolf 64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2013, 01:45 AM   #29
steveg700
King
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Targe View Post
Everyone is ignoring history. Untrained citizens are worthless against trained troops. Cities often fell without a shot fired, they surrendered en mass, at the first sign of the enemy.
I think undefended cities with no units should have zero combat ability. Should be captured immediately. To compeccompensate, give zero maint cost for garrisoned units, and allow limited stacking in cities.
Everyone's not ignoring history. We're bearing in mind that Civilization is not about historical recreation. To leave cities defenseless means that eveyrone should turtle up and huddle their units together rather than go out and actually do anything. After all, if you go wage war on one side of your empire, I can just blitzkrieg you and snatch all your border cities. Of course, while I'm doing that, somebody else is cheap-shotting me. And so it goes.

For this very reason, cities learned very the value of maintaining watches and militias. Any developed nation has internal defenses.

Last edited by steveg700; Mar 10, 2013 at 01:53 AM.
steveg700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION V > Civ5 - General Discussions > Civ - Ideas & Suggestions > Make Cities Weaker

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR