The pre-AFSNES I.

The Second and Third Cycles of the Mataimakhandros WILL come (and thanks for the Messiah das!) as soon as I can get a bit of time. I am currently swamped (quite literally! - we may be evacuated this weekend) both, as stated, literally, and metaphorically (with work). Anyway, sorry I missed the deadline das, but I trust whatever happens you'll use them in an entertaining fashion.
 
Carp. Trout.

That was a great update das, but I'm kind of on a different continent from the normal one, so full orders are sort of impossible.

Very broad NPC guidelines should be coming soon. If not, impovise with several generations of half-mad Avtokrators prone to emotional instability and strategic genius.
 
Very broad NPC guidelines should be coming soon.

I fear they shall be coming a bit too late (the deadline being 28 hours ago). ;) Still, I know how it feels.
 
Flooding I presume.

Yup yup. Dunno how they're gonna evacuate us though, all the trains have shut down and buses are few and far between :p
 
BT Update V - Years 100-400 AD

New World:

The trade contact established between Moche and Danipaguache in the end of the 1st century AD bore far richer fruit than could have initially been expected. By 200 AD, Zapotec trade routes had connected the Nahuan tribes to the northwest with the southern provinces of Moche. Coastal trade in general was greatly stimulated, as was development of naval technology, though the Moche traders never did really try to compete with the Zapotec ones. New cities sprung up, and old ones became prosperous. Great technology exchanges occurred, prompting great developments in metallurgy, fabrics, architecture and agriculture in both the Andes and the north. Some of the crops and animals were exchanged as well, over time.

A major catastrophe occurred in 260 AD; the eruption of the Lake Ilopango, which caused great damage to agriculture in both the southern Mayan states and in the young Zapotec colonies to their east, as well as temporarily complicating navigation and trade. While the Zapotecs had recovered comparatively quickly, and even benefited from the damage to their would-be competition, the southern Mayans were seriously hard-hit as a combination of immediate damage, agricultural crisis and social upheaval culminated in the abandonment of the heretofore-ascendant Xukpi capital, Copan, after a brutal civil war. The other local cities were too weak to fill in the vacuum of power. This decline in the southern threat favoured both the Zapotecs – who even established control over some of the Mayan port cities under puppet rulers – and the central Mayan city-states, especially Sakbe, which, through dynastic intermarriage, commerce and successful warring, had eventually come to dominate the region. Under Sakbean rule, a new golden age dawned; Andean and Zapotec technologies were adapted, great pyramids were built, the Mayan scripts and calendars were refined and a superior system of imperial administration arose under the leadership of the great king K’ak’-B’alam (fl. early 3rd century AD). Most of the greatly-weakened southern city-states were forced to submit to either Sakbe or the Zapotec state, Danipaguache; the northern city-states, meanwhile, existed in Sakbe’s shadow, though they remained independent and prosperous in their own right.

The old state of Teotihuacan slowly declined and disintegrated. That occurred very, very slowly, even though barbarian invasions and civil wars sped up the process. Although in the end of the 4th century AD a cultural and economic renaissance had began, the decline had already resulted in the effective independence of many former provinces; Danipaguache, already only nominally subservient, had regained its independence in full and even retook some of the old Zapotec lands, some of the Olmec cities broke away and eventually coalesced into a loosely-unified monarchy, and the fringe colonies of Apatzingan and Xacalla became effectively though not officially independent, their ambitious rulers carving out their own petty empires. Still, Teotihuacan Proper was preserved.

The eruption aside, Danipaguache fared very well indeed in this time. Although independence was regained, no new efforts to conquer the native region were made; instead, a colonial empire was developed. With a combination of straightforward colonisation and cultural assimilation, most of the Lenca lands were brought into the Zapotec fold. The Nahuan and Comanchi lands were at best secondary, but the colonies already existent there expanded somewhat, and the trade network has fully recovered before the 4th century AD.

Both the Nahuans and the Comanchi, being strongly influenced by their neighbours and developing more complex societies thanks to the commerce, have in the meantime developed their own early states, based around the cities of Chalchihuites and Popayan respectively.

Lastly, the Moche Empire stagnated with time but generally remained quite well-off; sure, there were also a few rebellions and even civil wars, but none of them ended up having much of a serious impact and were forgotten by history. The rise in trade resulted in a gradual shift to a more naval focus. As already said no actual attempt to replace the Zapotecs as prime traders was made; instead, a large fleet of big and well-decorated ships was built, both to defeat some nascent attempts at piracy and to impress the lesser peoples, especially during a 319-322 AD grand embassy to the northern lands and a 376 AD voyage into the Pacific, which culminated in early contact with the newly-arrived Polynesians on Rapa Nui.

Mediterranean and Europe:

The Age of Conquerors (2nd century BC-1st century AD) had perhaps affected the Mediterranean most of all places. For much of that period, civil wars, revolutions and campaigns on the land and the sea kept redrawing the borders, and at its end, both Tartessos and Paphlagonia, hegemons of old, had retreated far and lost much land, while Karung, another old great power, completely ceased to be. And in a series of wars, Protagoras, Avtokrator of the Hellenes – and his son and heir Poseidonius – had carved out a vast Hellenic Empire in the Central Mediterranean, defeating numerous enemies and conquering diverse peoples. This new Hellenic Empire had replaced Tartessos as the central power in the Mediterranean; and like its predecessor, it had moved into the focus of both trade and warfare in the Mediterranean as the whole region entered a new era.

Although regional and ethnic tensions constantly grinded away at the empire, the early 2nd century AD had been largely kind to the Hellenes. Rebellions were put down, and Hessonian, Thracian, Athanoi and Libyan attackers were kept at bay. Under the benevolent rule of Avtokrator Thales (r. 108-143 AD), trade, arts and science alike prospered and flourished, and the war-weary Mediterranean was generally being rejuvenated. The purportedly-mad Avtokrator Gelon then came to power; though his reign saw rising corruption and decadence, as well as constant campaigns against Hessonia that ultimately failed to decisively defeat the hardy polity, he and his extremely wealthy court-favourites were also prominent as patrons of art, and the Avtokrator himself oversaw the reconstruction of Delphi into a truly magnificent and imperial city after the 156 AD fire (which he may well have started himself, though that is disputed). Gelon’s costly campaigns did bear some fruit; the Hessonians were greatly weakened (especially by the Hellene destruction of important aqueducts and fields) and stopped in their drive into Thrace.

This bore unexpected and largely coincidental fruit. As of the 2nd century AD Thracian feudal state was once again falling apart, but numerous southern principalities had been successfully rallied in circa 160 AD by a disgruntled warrior called Olek, who unified the local revanchist factions and dethroned the Hessonophile prince of Skupi, taking that city for himself and turning it into his base of operations. Olek was committed to the reconquest of the Hessonian lands; initially he allied with the Hellenes, but was increasingly repulsed by their arrogance and Gelon’s remorseless use of Thracians as arrow fodder. The camel’s back was broken when, after Gelon’s death in 178 AD, the Hellenes signed a cease-fire with the Hessonians, abandoning their Thracian allies just as these were beginning to make progress with the recapture of Pulpudeva. Olek was driven back, but did not lose heart; the Hessonians were clearly getting exhausted, while he now managed to secure the support of the king in Akurna; even though that king’s supremacy was now solely ceremonial, he nonetheless helped bring in many more Thracians. As the Hessonians suffered from famines, Thracian rebellions broke out, and Olek was quick to support them. In 183 AD the Hessonians were decisively defeated in the legendary Battle of Marsa, and though Olek died from wounds and old age before the next year most of the conquered Thracian lands were by then liberated, the Hessonians barely holding out in Kratopolis and some other coastal lands. And so as King Polemon ascended to the Hessonian throne in 186 AD he had every reason to be unhappy with the state of his kingdom. Something had to be done.

And so while the Hellenes warred with the resurgent Tartessians, the Athanoi and the Latin rebels in Italy in the west, Polemon worked to revive Hessonian fortunes in the east. Fortunately for him, the situation in Anatolia was quite favourable for his plan; in other words, the entire peninsula was more or less in anarchy. Paphlagonia in particular was in the middle of a succession crisis. Through previous dynastic ties and clever intrigue, combined with a quick and quiet insertion of Hessonian elite hypaspists in key cities, Polemon managed to organise his own ascent to the Paphlagonian throne and set out to restore law and order in Paphlagonia, whilst inheriting the Paphlagonian military – much diminished since its glory days, but still a potent force, especially the fleet and the cavalry arm. Polemon’s efforts at greater military and political integration resulted in some minor rebellions, which were all defeated; after that, the reorganised and strengthened Paphlagonian military was ready to march west, firstly overrunning the disorderly Hellene provinces of Lydia and Ionia. Polemon would die during the 198 AD siege of Ephesus; he left his task of imperial revival to his two sons, King Timandros and Prince-Admiral Rahemos.

By the beginning of the 3rd century AD the Hellene Empire had already began to disintegrate. The end of the preceding century saw the Tyrrhenian War culminate with the disastrous Hellene naval defeat at Aethalia [1], and the subsequent collapse of Hellene rule in central Italy. As already mentioned, Lydia and Ionia had fallen into anarchy even earlier, the comparatively small Hellene garrisons unwilling and unable to control the mountainous countryside, or for that matter the overpopulated cities. As the economic burden of supporting the empire increased while the political autonomy of the more distant polises was reduced, the Illyrian cities too had rebelled and formally claimed independence as soon as it was safe. The 200s AD saw the Hellene holdings in North Africa overran by Tartessos, Garamantes and Nubia, while the warlike south Thracian clans and princes raided deep into Greece itself. Still, Avtokrator Oriander retained considerable power at his disposal, and worked intently to restore Hellene might; he successfully defeated a rebellion and Tartessian invasion in Arecome, and captured Kratopolis itself, abandoned by its population and neglected by the Hessonian ruling family, which had wholly relocated itself to the Paphlagonian capital of Sinope. Having finally finished the conquest of Ionia, Timandros decided to retaliate with a decisive attack on Greece itself. Although the Paphlagonian fleet was defeated badly soon after the fall of Kratopolis and the entry of the Hellenic armada into the Black Sea, the main Hessonian fleet was in Ionia and was able to grow greatly since the fall of Ephesus and Miletus. Having already proven its worth in the coastal sieges and occasional Aegean skirmishes, it now sailed straight to Attica, where a base of operations was established. The Hellene fleet was defeated at Kea, while the Hessonians besieged and assaulted Delphi. The casualties were high, but in the end the city fell and was razed to the ground, its population slaughtered. Avtokrator Oriander wasn’t there at the moment, campaigning against the Thracians, but obviously even without his death the government of the Hellenic Empire was severely disrupted by this event, especially as it was followed up with similar invasions elsewhere in Hellas. This time, the Hessonians wanted to subdue Greece for good, and so punished all resistance severely, whilst also rooting out what remained of local traditions, privileges and self-governance. In this manner they asserted their authority in central and southern Greece during this campaign, but Oriander and his loyalists continued to resist in the north until Oriander’s death in 218 AD. Other resistance still did continue, with urban rebellions in Hellas itself and a rogue Hellenic governor carving out his own kingdom in Arecome.

Much of the 3rd century AD was then spent by the Hessonians on consolidating their new empire. The capital was returned to Kratopolis, which was greatly renovated. Aqueducts and suchlike were repaired. A new imperial bureaucracy was set up and combined with the feudal system in the governance of the Hessonian Empire. Wars of conquest were waged; former Neo-Akkadian Anatolia was subdued, as was the principality of Skupi, until then ruled by Olek’s descendants (though further advances into Thrace were highly unsuccessful). At the same time, trade was picking up again after a brief decline during the Hellenic Empire’s waning years. Favourable trade relations were established with the embattled Tauric Empire. During the 4th century AD, Hessonia began to stagnate somewhat, bogging down in endless border wars with Thrace and Saganu, and also suffering from the disruption in the trans-European trade routes caused by the steppe nomad movements. Several rebellions occurred, but were all put down. For now, the Hessonian Empire remained hegemonic in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Elsewhere in the Mediterranean, the fall of the Hellenic Empire had provided the reviving Dominate of Tartessos (from this time on increasingly often referred to as the Arganthine Empire) with a great opportunity to reassert power. Indeed, the Arganthines – who had lost so much land, power and wealth during the wars with Paphlagonia and Hellas in the Age of Conquerors – were now undergoing a long-due renaissance. The central Iberian region was already thriving, and the south has now recovered as well, largely thanks to the trade, newly intensified by the loosening of restrictions for foreign trade ships beyond the Horns of Tigranus and growth of trade contacts with the Atlantic Celtic states. Likewise, great innovations were made in mining, allowing the economy to truly thrive. As already mentioned, the Arganthines had waged fairly successful wars against the Hellenes. Under Dominos Indicorthos (r. 243-277 AD), the Arganthines had reformed their military and set out to take advantage of their effectively-restored western Mediterranean hegemony.

First of all, after effectively arranging the complete diplomatic isolation of the Sardinians, the Arganthines finally put an end to that extremely annoying, persistently raiding people; an attack in far superior force eliminated the Sardinians flotillas, and an overland invasion was launched, the Sardinians being forced to surrender or die (in battle or from starvation in the mountains). The traditional Sardinian political and social institutions were then thoroughly dismantled and an Arganthine governor appointed. After that came the turn of the Ligurians, who were attacked from the land and the sea; ultimately, fierce Ligurian resistance prevented a total victory, but the Arganthines nonetheless annexed the old Tartessian colonial region. And last came the invasion of Italy and Arecome, dominated by Athanoi theocratic warlords in the north and a Hellenic governorship in the south. The latter was defeated easily enough, in part because of wide population support for the invaders, while wars with the former raged for the rest of the century; still, towards circa 290 AD, the Arganthines had effectively reconquered the entirety of the Apennine Peninsula. Tartessian sea power in the West Mediterranean once more went unchallenged, and the position in North Africa was also improving, as peace with the local Berber tribes was restored and trans-Saharan trade truly took off with the rise of the camel caravans – this also contributed to the prosperity of the Berber desert kingdom of Garamantes during this period.

Much like with Hessonians, though, the northern border saw greater complications; perhaps more so for Arganthine allies than for the Arganthines themselves. The warlike Teutons were halted by the well-garrisoned Arganthine border fortifications, but they kept probing the Konstanthios Wall, while the ones in the coastal regions did something even worse – they took to piracy and seaborne raiding, causing great damage to the Atlantic commerce and on several occasions even trying to carve out empires for themselves in northwestern Iberia or western Britain. The Frisii – who had by then forged a vast confederation of diverse Germannic tribes, constantly incorporating those newly-arrived in Gaul – too reveled in raiding, terrorizing all the Celtic shores and occasionally striking towards Tartessian Iberia as well. Reckless Germannic raiding and territorial expansionism prompted Dumnorix Suessus IV (r. 197-228 AD) of the neo-Arecomicians to rally the Britannic feudals and other Celtic rulers (i.e. those in Armorica and Laigin) for a persistent war effort against all Germannics. The Frisii settlements on the eastern coast were the first to be conquered; from there, the neo-Arecomicians went to Armorica, which was hard-pressed by the Teutons and other Germanics. After some negotiations, the local king and his nobles recognised the supreme rule of the Dumnorix (seeing as New Arecomicia was strongly feudal, they still retained lots of power and independence), and rallied their forces in coordination with the Arecomician army, beginning the grand Celtic counteroffensive against the Germanics. With occasional help from Laigin and Tartessos, the Arecomicians had scored a series of victories in the 3rd century AD; numerous Frisii raids were thwarted by the strengthened Arecomician fleet, while on the land, the Germanics suffered a major defeat at Limonum and were generally pushed back. Some counter-raids against the Teutons and the Frisii alike were launched as well. It was already in the early 4th century AD, New Arecomicia had cooperated closely with the Arganthines to put the Teutonic Coast [2] under control. In the long term this proved impossible due to a clever resistance campaign waged by the Teuton warlord Osborn, but still, a major damage to Teutonic piracy and raiding was done. The Arecomician campaigns would have probably gone further still, had not a new radical change occurred in the late 4th century AD.

A major factor that constantly upset the peace and balance of the region in this era was, as already hinted, the continued westwards migration of warlike steppe horse nomad tribes. Already in the 3rd century AD, the Sarmatians were finally defeated and assimilated by some of the first of this new, Turkic series of westwards-fleeing tribes; in this case, the Bulgars. The Tauric Empire and the Lith amber traders on the eastern Baltic shore had in particular suffered from this, as it meant the disruption of one of the key amber routes; to make things worse, the Bulgars pressed on into the Tauric Empire, eventually reducing it to a shadow of its former self. Fleeing Tauric and other Sarmatians had, in the meantime, greatly destabilised the already-unstable Dacian lands and the Thracian principalities there (by this point the Thracians had completely devolved into infighting between small, for all our purposes independent, feudal states, especially in the north). In the late 3rd/early 4th centuries AD, a particularily large tribal group had rampaged through the Pontic Steppe, a people that would eventually come to be known as the Tartars. While the Bulgars remained in the Pontic Steppe, gradually subjugating and replacing the Tauric Empire, the Tartars moved further, “settling down” in the Pannonian Plain after destroying or subjugating the Thracian and Thraco-Dacian principalities already there. Soon after, the Tartars forced most of the Thracian principalities south of the Danube to submit as well, apart from a few defiant princes that rallied around Pulpudeva and utilised their mountainous terrain to fight off the Tartar attacks. While the Pulpudevan kings have unintentionally shielded the Hessonians from Tartar attack, they still did utilise their own new-gained unity and the increasing Hessonian difficulties elsewhere to attack southwards and gain considerable inland and coastal territories later in the century, under King Orbelus (though some of these gains were lost soon after his death).

Likewise, in 327-333 AD, the Tartars campaigned against the post-Hellenic Illyrian city-states, razing some and being paid off by the others. The semi-barbaric Illyrians to the west of Pannonian heartlands (which by then had already been settled by the last of the arriving Tartar tribes) were defeated and forcefully incorporated as well. The Tartars secured their position and focused on raids in Italy and the Balkans, conspiring with the deteriorating climate to force the Athanoi to flee further south, into the newly-conquered northern Italian lands as well as into conflict with Arganthopolis over the centre of the Apennine peninsula.

The second big Tartar push had occurred only after 379 AD, when the semi-sedentary raiding Tartars were finally properly unified by a great chieftain, Mugula the Tartar. In the face of toughening southern and southwestern resistance, Mugula marched north, to subjugate the Slavs and Carpians along the Vistula, and then moved westwards, subjugating or displacing Germanic (and on occasion other peoples as well, mostly Celts on the Ligurian border) tribes as he went, and thus gathering a multiethnic, diverse horde. The mass migrations of Germannic tribes fleeing from the Tartars greatly destabilised the Frisii tribal confederacy, as did Mugula’s victories over the Frisii along the Rhine and further west. Mugula’s forces also invaded Liguria, but were repulsed, as was the 387-394 AD Tartar invasion of Italy, as the Athanoi had by then established themselves well in northern and central Italy, creating a semi-feudal theocratic kingdom there after defeating the weaker Arganthine garrison. The hard-fought Athanoi victory in the Battle of Metaurus, however, failed to put an end to Tartar raids as such. And in the meantime, even as he grew old, Mugula the Tartar continued to cause trouble in Western Europe, advancing further and further in his raids and attacking both Celt and German. As of 400 AD, Mugula the Tartar remained one of the most powerful men in Europe, even though it was fairly obvious that his multiethnic empire was unlikely to outlive him by much.

The aforementioned Liths had in the meantime rebuilt their trade routes and, through a system of allies and tributaries, constructed a tribal confederation of the Balts, pulled closer together by warfare with both Slavs and Tartars.

As already mentioned, the Frisii tribal confederacy, already rather loosely-knit despite all the efforts of the Frisii themselves, was further destabilised by the Tartar attacks and Germannic migrations. Indeed, it was destabilised to such an extent that it crumbled altogether, or rather shrunk to the northeastern, coastal third of its territory, while the rest squabbled and fought both each other and all the other players in the region. While the Arecomicians managed to make considerable progress early in the period, the last two decades of the 4th century AD saw the sheer numbers of the newcomer Germanics – combined with the rise of short-lived, but extensive coalitions – reverse some of the progress gained. At the same time, the old Germanic tribes either joined the new ones or migrated in various directions after having been displaced. A presence was reestablished in northern Britannia (after some unsuccessful colonies in the south, unsuccessful because of the heavy-handed Arecomician response – something that was probably forthcoming now as well, as several northern Britannic lords swore allegiance to the Dumnorix), and great military pressure was placed on both Ligurians and Teutons, especially as a fair amount of newcomers migrated southwards as well. While the Ligurians were simply expelled from the Rhodanus and retreated into the mountains, the Teutons didn’t have such an option and instead split; several clans migrated by sea to northwestern Iberia, and the rest joined the Chatti confederacy as the well-disciplined and ingenuous Chatti warriors sapped the Konstanthios Wall, enabling a major Germannic invasion in northern Iberia. Although Dominos Korbis decisively defeated the Chotti in the Battle of Ilerda in 397 AD, this was not before several large Germannic tribes migrated into Iberia, causing general social upheaval and denying any opportunities to expel them with any reasonable speed and ease, especially as the Teutons in northwest ominously succeeded in carving out their own petty kingdom and defending it against a reconquest attempt. Thus the century ended in much uncertainty.
 
Middle East and Central Asia:

The 1st century AD (of Agade Dag) saw the spectacular ascent of the Neo-Akkadian Empire to a position of utter and unchallengeable superiority in the Middle East. This new empire stretched further than any of the preceding imperial powers in the region. However, by the beginning of the 2nd century AD, the early religious impulse that kept the Akkadians going was starting to run out. The empire had spread over vast and diverse lands, governing very different peoples, and indeed central power was declining, with local governors growing in significance. However, many were determined to not allow Akkad to go the way of its ancient predecessor, or that of a more recent failed empire, Paphlagonia. In 101 AD, the Kur’kannag (convent) had assembled in Nippur under the Dag’Uru (the Pure Emperor) Shabatu to breathe new life into the empire and its religion. Diverse religious issues were discussed and important decisions were taken. Absolute monotheism and trinitarianism (the belief in the tripartite nature of Enlil) was imposed, and henotheism, as well as various non-Akkadian religions, was denounced and purged. The missionary ideal was formulated and the practice of state-backed missions both within the empire and beyond its borders was introduced. The network of urban temples - centres of spiritual life - was solidified; the local Ekus (high priests) ruled the temples, but were subordinated to the Ek’annu - the High Priest of Nippur. Assorted monastic orders were created as well. Shabatu saw to it that the “demon-worshipper cults” (i.e. all religions other than Agade Dag) are rooted out, and in the process reasserted central power in the Neo-Akkadian Empire. There was resistance. It was crushed.

As for the missionaries, they established an Agade Dag presence in numerous Mediterranean and Central Asian trade centres, to a lesser extent in India and Nubia, though no truly major conversions – outside of some Central Asian tribes – had occurred outside of the empire within this century. Inside the empire, the demon-worshippers survived in the underground and amongst the populace as well, but none dared openly claim a faith other than Agade Dag, and indeed, after a few generations the religious imposition had concluded in success.

Naturally, while the occasional revolts against the Neo-Akkadian Empire still occurred, opportunistic powers frequently attempted to bite off some frontier provinces. Wushans and Saganu struck from the north, and the Paphlagonians too tried to reunite Anatolia in the 140s AD; in the meantime, Arabic and Libyan tribes kept raiding and harassing the southern holdings. But the military settlements and vast armies of the Neo-Akkadians kept all attackers at bay early on. Furthermore, the Neo-Akkadians counterattacked the Saganu and the Wushans, both in retaliation and in punishment for “mistreatment” (in the Saganu case, gruesome slaughter) of missionaries. The Saganu lost some border lands, but ultimately proved too hard to subdue; as for the Wushans, their army was massacred at Samarkand and their core territories were conquered in a series of campaigns, the empire falling apart and the Wushan tribes becoming easy pickings for other nomads then arriving from the east.

However, that was the zenith of the Neo-Akkadian Empire, and after it came the inevitable decline. For in truth, the Neo-Akkadian army was badly overstretched, and despite all the efforts to improve the situation agriculture continued to decline. Many regions of the empire never were properly restored from the ravages of previous wars. The sheer size of the empire, furthermore, unavoidably challenged efforts at centralised rule, and the military governors of the frontiers grew de facto independent; while that allowed them to deal with foreign incursions better, the cohesion of the empire as such suffered. And meanwhile, new threats were emerging. While the Mediterranean powers were preoccupied with other affairs, the Nubian Empire to the south of old Karung was definitely more interested in northwards expansion now, while in Central Asia, the Turko-Mongolic tribes which arrived from the east – most notably, the Huns – displacing the Wushans and prompting them to acts of great desperation, while themselves preparing to move further, lured by rumours of rich lands in the southwest.

It was in the end of the 2nd century AD – in the late 180s AD, to be exact – that the beginning of what would be called “the Trying Times” by Neo-Akkadian chroniclers had come. When it began, the standing Neo-Akkadian armies were bogged down in siege warfare against the Saganu and in punitive expeditions against the Arabs, while the frontier troops had with time grown careless and undisciplined. First came a Nubian attack in Karung; it scored initial victories, but eventually was fought off. Then a Saganu counteroffensive threatened northern Mesopotamia, diverting the Neo-Akkadian reserves even as the Nubians launched a second invasion. And then came a great Hunnish attack, however. The loss of Karung and other disasters, including natural ones, caused a great crisis of confidence and this combined with the onset of economic hardships due to droughts and warfare resulted in peasant rebellions, as well as in violent (though not successful) resurgence of “demon-cults”. In 201 AD a restless and ambitious northwestern frontier commander, Ishpuinis, launched a rebellion and marched on Nippur. Soon after, Dag’Uru Ninkhanna died in mysterious circumstances, causing dynastic infighting and persuading some of the court factions to support Ishpuinis. Ishpuinis successfully captured Nippur and was, after some persuasion, crowned as Dag’Uru by the Ek’annu. Rumours of coercion involved, combined with the general chaos in the empire, resulted in a confusing, multi-sided civil war as various other generals marched to support or overthrow Ishpuinis. In the meantime, Hunnish raids resumed in full strength.

While all this happened, changes occurred in Nubia as new lands were being incorporated. Influences of both Karrism and Agade Dag, as well as those of Paramatmanism (Coalescent Tendency in particular), had fused with the Nubian tradition in the teaching of Prophet Asha, who preached in the war-wrecked Karung in the late 2nd century AD prior to his sudden and violent death at the hands of bandits. Ashaism as a religion was also monotheistic, based on the worship of the ancient Nubian (and Egyptian) god Amon Ra, and called for world-wide proselytism. This religion soon gained immense popular support in Karung, where even many of the Akkadian colonists grew disenchanted with the old religion after the conquest, and also spread into Nubia. So it was that in 223 AD, a new king rose to power in Nubia; named Harsiotef, he embraced Ashaism, fusing it with the old Nubian state religion and using it to bring the diverse peoples of the empire together. He then declared that in order for Amon Ra’s reign of peace and brotherly law to occur, the false gods had to be overthrown, and the evil empires built in their name destroyed. Introducing vast military reforms and recruiting Libyan and Arabic tribes for their valuable camelry, Harsiotef set out with his forces in the war that would be remembered in Nubian history as the Ankhade.

By 227 AD – when the Ankhade began – Ishpuinis had more or less secured his power base in Akkad and even temporarily repulsed the Huns; he also restored unity and coordination between the centre and the provinces. Nonetheless, the empire remained unstable and plagued by revolts, as well as by Saganu and Hunnish raids. The underlying weaknesses were soon exposed as the Nubian army invaded the Levant; as the superior strategic maneuverability allowed Harsiotef to destroy army after army, several cities, awestruck, surrendered to him without a struggle. Ishpuinis marshaled his forces and desperately tried to halt the Nubian advance, but Harsiotef once again proved capable of outmaneuvering his enemy and defeating him in detail. The Neo-Akkadians retreated to defend Mesopotamia, but the Great Desert Wall has been decaying over time and the reinforcements didn’t arrive fast enough to save the garrisons there; in a carefully-plotted desert maneuver, the Nubians attacked a southern point in the wall and broke through, creating a serious threat to Sumeria itself, while another army advanced into the Mitanni province. Ishpuinis repulsed the northern invasion, but the southern one caught him off guard. The decisive battle came at Babylon, as the Neo-Akkadians hurried to relieve the besieged Nippur. The Neo-Akkadians held the field, but suffered huge casualties and were unable to proceed, while the Nubians fell back in good order and finished the siege. Ishpuinis was killed by a traitor soon after, although finishing off the remaining Neo-Akkadian forces took years; only 235 AD was Harsiotef able to declare this campaign over, having defeated the last Neo-Akkadian warlord in Media, although most of the further northeastern holdings of the empire were by then lost to the Hunnish tribes.

By this point, the old Nubian rivalry with Nyayana had once more risen to the forefront. Alarmed by the Nubian march of conquest, the Nyarnans worked hard to prop up Ishpuinis, and after he lost, the various Neo-Akkadian and rebel warlords; they also attempted to retake the Gate of Tears, but the Nubians managed to fight off that attack. Frustrated in his efforts to consolidate the empire by the Nyarnan spies who kept killing officials and inciting rebellions, Harsiotef snapped and launched an invasion of Avyaktaraga itself. Building up a powerful fleet in the Persian Gulf and marching along the coastline, he allied with some Hunnish tribes and attacked Nyayana. He greatly underestimated the epic fortifications in the Lower Indus, however; the Nyarnans fought back assault after assault, mauling Harsiotef’s army. He then committed, with his remaining forces, to a naval attack; though he had somehow managed to actually sneak in and land near Nyayana, his fleet was soon enough attacked and destroyed in an epic battle by the main Nyarnan armada, leaving the king stranded and without supplies. Refusing to surrender, but realising that his situation was hopeless, Harsiotef and his entire force assaulted the walls with great ferocity, shocking the defenders and briefly advancing to the second line of defenses before being cut down in a vicious Nyarnan counterattack.

Upon Harsiotef’s death, things quickly fell apart. Rebels, generals and heirs warred all over his empire, and the Nyarnans made sure to destabilise things further, playing various warlords off against each other. Soon, however, other issues emerged as the Huns pressed forward into the Upper Indus valley.

The post-Harsiotef wars raged for the rest of the 3rd century AD and indeed into the beginning of the 4th century AD, various kingdoms gradually emerging. Nubia itself was comparatively untouched, although it did see a fair amount of fighting and the final end of Qahtani rule, a native Nubian dynasty taking power with the leadership of King Nashta in 280 AD. The Nubians successfully reasserted their power in Karung and Hejaz, but further progress proved unfeasible as a surprisingly strong Levantine state arose around the city of Ammon, and beside that Nashta was more interested in exploiting Nyayana’s short-term weakness to seize Nyarnan colonies in Africa. This bid succeeded and the Nubian hold on the Gate of Tears was strengthened, allowing the Nashtids to seriously raise toils in order to fund the reconstruction efforts and the integration of Karung; however, this resulted in great Avyaktaragan opposition. Around the middle of the 4th century AD, Nyayana’s Third Nubian War came and the Nubians (as discussed in more detail in the Indian Ocean section) were defeated badly, losing all of their gains made against Nyayana as well as much of their fleet. At the same time, wars with Ammon weakened both sides; this and the naval defeats allowed the Hejazi Arabs to rebel and form their own (Ashaist) kingdom, while Ammon fell to Dag’Uru Ibruum, who had led an Akkadian resurgence and managed to rebuild the core of the Akkadian Empire, although Karung, Central Asia and southern Anatolia remained out of his reach (not that he minded, being more interested in ensuring the rebuilt empire’s long-term viability). Still, on the plus side, the Nubians had successfully held on to Karung and largely succeeded in integrating it into their empire (thanks in part to the return of the Nubian capital to northern Nubia), although the hold on the southern regions of Nubia was now weakening, and the regional tensions indeed were far from gone elsewhere as well, threatening to tear the state apart in the long term.

Beyond Nubia, Hejaz and the rebuilt Akkadian Empire, Hessonia, Saganu (who had to flee southwards as their northern lands were overran by newly-arrived steppe-peoples) and the Hunnish tribes had expanded to a fair extent; the latter remained a serious menace, even as northern and central parts of Central Asia came under the control of the Toba tribes. The Toba were disunited; although they did have a confederated empire in the early 4th century AD, it was shattered by internecine strife and the constant violent migrations that dominated the steppe in this day. The consequences for Europe have already been explained.

Indian Ocean:

The fall of Magadha in the 1st century BC did not mean the end of large-scale warfare in India; if anything, it meant a new period of struggle for local hegemony between the various local empires, struggle which largely remained on a border war level for most of the 1st centuries BC and AD, but which inevitably escalated further in the 2nd century AD, as the Indian great powers (the Nyarnan Irinate, the Girnar Ascendancy, the Banghan Empire and the Kingdom of Sinhal) finished consolidating their gains and looked hungrily beyond their borders.

First to seize initiative was the Irinate of Nyayana. The further aristocratisation of the ascendant capital city itself, the gradual rise of a semi-feudal class in the countryside and the terrible mishandling of the First Nubian War resulted in a series of power-struggles, coups and civil wars, which however ended as early as in 111 AD, when Irin Balani took power and waged a series of campaigns against the petty Saka principalities, the disunited Girnarese feudal empire and the Banghan Empire. Despite logistical difficulties and growing resistance, the disciplined and well-organised Nyarnan armies had allowed the conquest of much of northern India, and war was carried further south as well. The invasion of Kaitarpur was however defeated, while the Girnarese rallied under one of the stronger Damaras (warlord-barons), Toral of Vidisha, who had inflicted major losses on the Nyarnans as well, though failing to reconquer the northern lands. In the end, however, it was political opposition at home that halted Balani, as by 124 AD the urban aristocrats had reasserted their power and elevated a puppet to the throne, causing a new civil war. Balani won, but his progress was greatly undone and his empire was severely destabilised both by the civil war and by the purges that occurred in the aftermath. After his death, yet another civil war began, and though the Upper Gangetic plain and Thar Desert remained in Nyarnan hands Bangha had already rebounded. The Nyarnans continued to suffer from intrigue and disunion later on – Balani’s heirs constantly sought to regain power, another army faction which occasionally aligned with them pushed for the conquest of India, various aristocratic factions were generally in favour of consolidation but also usually against each other, engineer-farmers wanted to regain their old influence and to properly integrate the new gains and a mercantile naval faction demanded a war of revanche against Nubia. Still, the rest of the 2nd century AD didn’t see many full-blown civil wars.

In the meantime, the southern empire of Sinhal prospered. Its unique blend of land despotism with Bahulatvan philosophies and mercantilism produced strong power both on the land and in the sea. Under the great King Rajaratne (r. 154-197 AD), the Sinhalese – in alliance with the Lankan ascendancy of Podhigai – had established a very strong presence in Dwipa and Malaya, while also taking advantage of the weakened state of northern India to greatly expand northwards, their numerous yet also well-disciplined armies conquering the Girnarese feudals on the Narmara and the already-weakened mountain kingdom of Kaitarpur. These wars were costly, however, and the army was seriously weakened; furthermore, resources had to be stretched thin by the imperial wars in both the north and the east. Though the Sinhalese golden age continued into the very early 3rd century AD, it was cut short when a major coalition successfully conspired against Sinhal; Kaitarpur rebelled and reclaimed independence, Girnar, reunited and revitalised under the High King Morari, reconquered Narmada and waged a great war of conquest of pillage in the very Sinhalese heartlands, and Bangha attacked along the coast, also defeating (though not quite destroying) the vaunted Sinhalese fleet. The royal family and court, panicked, fled to Podhigai, where an alliance and union had been negotiated with the local ruling council, creating the parliamentary monarchy of the Prasanna Empire, ruled by both the council and the Sinhalese royal family from the city of Podhigai. From there, the Prasannans struck back, reconquering the southeastern and south-central heartlands, though the northern territories were lost to Bangha, Kaitarpur and the rapacious Girnarese feudals (also, several western cities chose to declare independence and ally with the Bahulatvan city-states instead, also receiving the support of Nyayana).

Under the High King Morari (r. 199-264 AD), Girnar was reunified after a prolonged period of feudal strife and greatly reorganised; a new code of laws was adapted, regulating the relations between the elected High King (first among equals, but still recognised as supreme military commander) and his feudals (both the Damaras and the petty nobles used to balance their influence). This stabilised the High Kingdom and allowed Morari to organise a series of successful campaigns of conquest in the early 3rd century AD; in addition to the aforementioned war against Sinhal, Morari also backstabbed and conquered Kaitarpur, pushed the Banghans out of their northwestern holdings and attacked Nyayana, then already busy fighting the Second Nubian War in the Middle East and the Arabian Sea (as has been related elsewhere). The Upper Gangetic Plain was conquered with comparative ease, and the Thar Desert was recaptured after some intricate maneuvers, but after that the war bogged down; much like Harsiotef of Nubia, Morari proved unable to breach the powerful Nyarnan inner defenses, and the war in the Upper Indus too had devolved into siege and raid warfare soon enough. Still, the Nyarnans were significantly weakened by their extensive warring, and though they had managed to expel the Girnarese out of the Upper Indus after Morari’s death, they were unable to effectively fight back against what came next; namely, the fresh hordes from Central Asia. First the Wushans (dubbed Osans by the Indians) and then their Hunnish pursuers (soon to become known as the Hunas) invaded the Upper Indus, ultimately overwhelming and severely beating the Nyarnan garrisons there, forcing the Irinate to fall to back to the fortifications in the Lower Indus.

The Hunas eventually emerged as the preeminent force in the Upper Indus; rallied by a powerful chieftain named Uldin Haital, they not only subdued the Wushans and the surviving Nyarnan colonists in the region, but also attacked the High Kingdom of Girnar, severely defeating several northern Damaras and raiding extensively in northern India. The Upper Gangetic Plain and the Thar Desert alike came under Huna rule, the Girnarese feudals there displaced, and Bangha, now reasserting its control over the Lower Gangetic Plain, was likewise incapable of stopping their raids. In the end, ofcourse, the Huna invasion ended much like one would expect it to happen; after Uldin Haital’s death in 289 AD, the Hunas collapsed into infighting, granting respite to Girnar and Bangha. Though the Hunas retained control over the Upper Indus and the Thar Desert for some time, their subsequent raids were largely repulsed, and no new strong Huna leader subsequently arose. Huna principalities now squabbled over northern India.

After Morari’s death and the Huna invasions, the High Kingdom of Girnar had suffered some new crises; feudal strife, though decreased by the Morari Code, continued on a lower level, and election wars were waged frequently. The southern and eastern Damaras, far from Girnar and governing newly-conquered lands, gained both effective and self-declared independence over the rest of the 3rd century AD. Nonetheless, Morari’s and Uldin Haital’s wars had effectively put an end to this cycle of hegemony wars in India; in Nyayana, the naval-mercantile faction had triumphed and set about restoring the badly shaken and neglected Nyarnan hegemony in the Arabian Sea, while both Bangha and Prasenna had firmly shifted their focus to the eastern seas. And so when in 326 AD High King Sejal restored comparative peace and order in the Girnarese Core and forced the Hunas in the Upper Ganges and the Thar Desert as well as the splintered nobles in western Kaitarpur to swear allegiance to him after a series of campaigns, no one stopped him from proclaiming Girnarese hegemony over the Indian inlands, even though the Upper Indus remained in the hands of Huna feudals while eastern Kaitarpur was conquered by the Banghans, who had by then moved their capital southwards to Simhapura.

The Bahulatvan cultural life declined somewhat during this time, stagnating and decreasing in intensity, although some progress still was made, especially in the 4th century AD (with the invention of a primitive printing press). Likewise, a “Coalescent Vehicle” philosophical tradition (based on incorporation of ideas from different Paramatmanistic cults) arose, causing the rise of High Paramatmanism which gained much support amongst the intellectual elites in both Bahulatva and other cosmopolitan centres, especially in the Sunda Ascendancy. Commercial life remained vigorous, and superior economical practices arose. Also, greater degrees of political and economic cooperation between the Bahulatva cities had to be adapted in order to compete more effectively with the ascendancies and states, a short-lived but extensive anti-Nubian coalition having tried (and ultimately failed) to conquer the Gate of Tears from the Nubians.

In the wake of Harsiotef’s grand campaigns and subsequent civil wars, Nubia – now under a native dynasty – emerged in a fairly strong position. The vassal Cushite tribes were incorporated, and most of the Nyarnan colonies in the Horn of Africa (somewhat neglected in the later 3rd century AD as Nyayana fought with Girnarese and Huna invaders and entered a new cycle of internal power struggles) were conquered. The strong Nubian galley fleet was able to defeat the Bahulatvan coalitionary expedition, although it was a close-ran fight. However, under Irin Bhrgu (r. 334-354 AD), Nyayana reemerged as a strong naval power in the Arabian Sea. Control over the remaining colonies was reasserted, and a very large armada was constructed, the Nubian galley designs being adapted and improved upon for the purpose of coastal warfare. Furthermore, a strong coalition was assembled; both the Ksayarnan Ascendancy (where a Paramatmanistic Judaist political elite had by then risen to power) and the Bahulatvan city-states had scores to settle and trade routes to liberate from high tolls. And so a grand fleet sailed west and crippled the Nubian naval capability in the battles of Caluula and of the Gate of Tears and in coordination with Avyaktaragan and Jewish uprisings reclaimed the former colonies. Breaking into the Red Sea, the Nyarnan fleet fought a series of skirmishes with the surviving Nubian fleet, and ultimately succeeded in burning the key Nubian dockyards. Still, the Nubians managed to inflict a fair amount of damage, harassing the Nyarnan fleet with fireships. Ultimately it was for naught, as the loss of his fleet and the resurgence of Akkad forced the Nubian king to sign a peace treaty in 352 AD, restoring to Nyayana its colonies (plus some extra coastal territory nearby) and lowering tolls, allowing the Nyarnans to reestablish a (very limited) Avyaktaragan commercial presence in the Mediterranean.

Aside from that, the western Indian Ocean was a mostly quiet place in this era. The Ksayarnan Ascendancy rose in wealth and importance as clove trade picked up, and, as already mentioned, the greatly Judaified Ascendancy saw the rise of a Jewish or Yahweist ruling class. The southern cities of Western Bahulatva were incorporated into the Ksayarnan Ascendancy and some southwards expansion occurred; also colonies were established on the recently-discovered great island of Andana [3], though some Bahulatvan city-states established colonies there as well.

The eastern Indian Ocean, meanwhile, was tumultuous, as it was since at least the 1st century BC. Contemporarily with the hegemony wars in India, the “Aksapata tejobhiru” (“Tournament of the Shadows”) occurred in Dwipa and Malay, where imperial powers jockeyed for the control over the weak local city-states, native proto-states and Annihilation Tendency baronates. This wasn’t as much a military conflict – though proxy wars and even direct naval showdowns too had happened – as a tournament of shadowy manipulation, the great powers using diplomacy, espionage and assassination in additional to simple cultural and economic influence. Podhigai and Sinhal had, as already mentioned, established a strong position after a successful naval campaign against certain resistant city-states followed up by skilled diplomacy in the late 2nd century AD, but Sunda had a fairly strong position as well, due to geography and past ties, as well as general prosperity; Bangha, the Bahulatvan city-states and southern baronates of Pralayadesha had likewise participated, though the latter focused more on piracy and raiding. After the Sinhalese semi-collapse, their situation briefly deteriorated, the Tumasik Ascendancy [4] briefly arising in the rebellious eastern colonies, but the Prasanna Empire had made the recovery of the eastern positions a major priority and after a bitter naval war in 223-251 AD the Tumasik Ascendancy was reabsorbed into the Empire. Pralayadeshan pirates were likewise defeated, though the attempt to conquer Pralayadesha was a costly failure. Though the Prasanna Empire had emerged as the regional hegemon, forcing most of the local Bahulatvan city-states and colonies to submit, the Banghans too had established and maintained a minor presence in Malaya, as did the south Chinese state of Luoyang, which also set up a colony in Borneo. The Sundanese Ascendancy too had expanded somewhat in Dwipa. Nonetheless, Sunda’s priorities lied in trade and technology; superior shipbuilding and cash crops were developed. Close contact was maintained with Luoyang, which had become a Sundanese ally, and with Ayutamradvipa, which received lots of Avyaktaragan migrants in this time.

The Indochinese peninsula had its own share of conflicts. Pralayadeshans ceased attempts to build an actual empire, and instead focused on raids, general destruction, havoc, chaos and piracy in every feasible direction. The Khmer Kanakan Empire suffered accordingly, but continued to expand along the Mekong for a while, as well as to launch counteroffensives into Pralayadeshan territory. In the end, the strain of military efforts combined with economical damage caused by Pralayadeshan raids and earthquakes, and the regional tensions that plagued the empire from the start resulted in a collapse; though the western core area was recovered around the provincial city of Uthai Thani, the southern Mekong Valley seceded and formed the Thipadei Kingdom, while in the north the Laotians created the Buddhist Xiang Kingdom, strongly influenced by both Luoyang and Tibet. The Malay state in southern Borneo had in the meantime fractured as well, falling apart into city-states.
 
East Asia:

In the wake of Heavenly Emperor Aotiao’s foundation of the Xiongnu Empire in the 1st century AD, the history of the region had entered a whole new era, with many drastic changes. Indeed, much of the 2nd century AD could be called a time of rest and cultural searching, as civilisations new and old dealt with the impact of that and other contemporary events. In the further, northern steppes, as populations of the tribes grew and climate worsened, wars broke out over the pasturages and tribal confederacies formed, seeking to impose an advantageous peace but in the end only managing to raise the wars to a greater scale; nonetheless, cease-fires occurred frequently enough. This confusing chaos of a cultural region interacted with the Xiongnu Empire in many different ways: the new monotheistic Xiongnu Tengrism replaced both the ancient shamanist tradition and the old Khitan dualistic Tengarism (ofcourse, this was made simpler by the large similarities and common roots of the three religions), the Silk Route was protected and indeed used by some of the tribes and raided by others, and the less successful tribes – as well as simply hot-headed ones – frequently either raided the northern provinces of the Xiongnu Empire or moved in to help colonise the more depopulated conquered regions, and/or fight the assorted local rebel scum.

Further south in the steppe lied the core Xiongnu regions, as well as the lands of subjugated peoples such as the Khitans; there, Xiongnu influences were naturally stronger, though as new tribes moved in, invited or not, tensions grew. Likewise, a traditionalist reaction against the new imperial culture – and the increasingly bureaucratised government in Wei (the imperial capital) – was beginning amongst the tribes, causing further tension, and rather forceful attempts to cultivate a sedentary way of life and to break the power of conservative tribal elders resulted in outright revolt in 122 AD; this revolt turned into a civil war thanks to the reactionary faction in the Wei court itself, and though the progressive imperial faction and the reformist Emperor Bikai had triumphed in the end it took seventeen years to restore order, and the conflict did not go away. The more sedentary regions were not necessarily better; while the Huang He valley, Turkified but civilised, was generally loyal (though the policy of inviting diverse and warlike tribes obviously had its risks), both Korea and the Yangtze valley had strong and increasingly resistant native cultures; in the former, the Koreans rallied around a new religion, Dangundo, based on the veneration of the nation’s legendary founder Dangun and clearly inspired by Himikoism of Jomon, while in the latter the Chinese drew inspiration from the revolutionary doctrines of Neosunfucianism, using the aforementioned civil war under Bikai to launch a major rebellion; tragically, it was brutally put down before Luoyang help could arrive, and the first of the attempts to liberate central China was then defeated in the Battle of Tanzhou.

Nonetheless, Luoyang did not give up so easily; swayed to the revanchist, neo-Mohist teaching of philosopher Wu Angtou (which had by then gained widespread support from amongst the Luoyang populace), young Emperor Fuchai was determined to expel the barbarian conquerors from North Luoyang at the least. Military reforms were introduced; a large army was built up and trained extensively (this and a colonial program also helped deal with the hordes of workless, homeless refugees that fled from the Xiongnu into Luoyang). Sundanese financial support was secured as well. Contacts with the surviving rebel movements were established, and support was granted. Relations with Zhongshan – the Emperor of which, Na Farong, was likewise preparing for a revanche against Xiongnu – were normalised and an alliance was eventually sealed with dynastic marriage. For their part, the Zhongshanese – who were left much weaker by their ultimately-unsuccessful wars of conquest in China followed up by the devastating Xiongnu invasion than the largely-unharmed Luoyang – were introducing economical and administrative reforms, rebuilding their professional army and greatly encouraging technological progress – especially the creation of superior crossbows, steel weapons and polearms.

The Xiongnu Empire was thus in a state of constant, though often rather quiet, war with the remaining Chinese states and the Chinese rebel movement. Still, for much of the 2nd century AD it remained strong enough to stand its ground, although the continued warfare prevented effective colonisation and drained the treasury considerably, especially as the Zhongshanese adapted highly effective pirate/sea raider tactics, devastating the coastal provinces and on one occasion even going up the Huang He to threaten Wei itself. Bikai died in 156 AD, but the succession was disappointingly peaceful. His son Shutan was generally detached and uninterested in the matters of state, allowing a significant growth in both corruption and dissent; in 188 AD he was overthrown by his uncle Fanlong, causing a civil war between Fanlong’s military and bureaucratic reformist supporters on one side and Shutan’s loyalists and tribal reactionaries on the other. Herein lied the opportunity.

While Fanlong was campaigning in Jehol, fresh rebellions against Xiongnu rule commenced in central China and in Korea; Turkic settlers and Xiongnu governors were butchered as several cities fell, though garrisons held out in the others. Koreans quickly received the support of a large army of Jomonese mercenaries (a warrior culture without war tends to produce restless men), and by 190 AD the peninsula was already secure in rebel hands. Fanlong was much more concerned by the events in the Yangtze valley; even as he defeated the northern tribes, the empire’s southern portions were overran by rebels and the invading armies of Zhongshan and Luoyang. Though the warlike Turkic tribes provided serious resistance and coordination between the various forces of the Chinese coalition was miserable, vast territories were lost in but a few years and indeed the Zhongshanese armies were threatening Wei itself. In 193 AD Fanlong mobilised all levies, called up all of the tribes sworn to fight for the Heavenly Empire and marched south. The Zhongshanese army that was trying to besiege Wei was overran and crushed by in a skillful double-encirclement, and fire arrows were used to turn away the Zhongshanese river flotilla. The three Xiongnu armies that crossed the Yangtze south had routed several Chinese forces before they could unite, and pacified much of the Chinese Mesopotamia (between Huang He and Yangtze). Still, as the coalition forces were pressed hard, their leaders were persuaded to coordinate the defenses of the Yangtze Valley. An extensive war of maneuver ensued, and culminated during a disastrous Xiongnu attempt to cross the Yangtze in 198 AD; in the Battle of Chibi, the cumbersome Xiongnu fleet was attacked by Chinese fire ships and river galleys, and was thoroughly destroyed, Fanlong himself dying with a large part of his army.

By this moment Emperor Fuchai was already dead, but his son Helu was no less determined to reconquer the northern lands. As the Xiongnu fell back in disarray, fortifying their positions along the Huang He and abandoning most of the Chinese Mesopotamia to the coalition, disagreements were quick to arise amongst the victors. Luoyang, which had contributed the largest force, now made no secret of intentions to annex most or all of the liberated territories, but in Guangling too a significant court faction persuaded the old emperor Na Farong to press claims to Na Kangdi’s former empire. Meanwhile, the rebels had grown quite apart from both of the coastal civilisations during the Xiongnu reign, and the several rebel warlords who had already carved out their own empires were obviously unwilling to hand these over. Admittedly, there was little solidarity amongst the rebels; some were quick to swear allegiance to Luoyang, others – to Zhongshan, others still aligned with the local warlords and a significant Neosunfucianist movement called for the popular revolution to be carried further and for an “empire of the peasants” to be created. And so the region fell into further infighting early in the 3rd century AD.

As usual for such multi-factional struggles, this took the shape of a series of on-again-off-again wars, with constantly changing fortunes and coalitions. For much of the first major period of warfare, 208-243 AD, an alliance of circumstance tried to thwart Emperor Helu’s reckless expansionism. The Zhongshanese army, cooperating with the warlords, managed to inflict several costly defeats on the Luoyang, but in the end the far superior numbers, advanced organisation and Sundanese financial support allowed Luoyang to triumph; though not all of the goals were met, Zhongshan’s Taiwanese and Atanamese colonies had been successfully conquered in a vigorous naval campaign, and more than a half of the liberated territories came under Luoyangese rule. The rest was either under Zhongshan or its allies. 252-257 AD saw a brief reconciliation to fight off a resurgent Xiongnu Empire; while few new lands were liberated, the Xiongnu army was seriously weakened. In 256 AD, however, Emperor Helu died and his successors proved much less driven and competent; in their carelessness they allowed the Neosunfucianist movement in the north to rebound from previous purges, while the ultimately-unsuccessful attempts to conquer the Huang He valley had caused economic troubles. In 268 AD a new period of warfare commenced, as Luoyangese weakness was exploited by both Zhongshan and the Neosunfucianists; the former reconquered Taiwan and raided the Luoyangese southern coasts while nibbling away at Helu’s northeastern conquests, and the latter rebelled in the still-miserable northwest, proclaiming the Renmin Empire (a curious combination of advanced political ideology, earnest efforts at egalitarian reform and – above everything else – a bloodthirsty orgy of peasant rebellion and general anarchy). The Luoyangese were badly hurt and pushed back to pre-War of Reconquest borders, and various counterattack attempts all failed. The Renmin Empire had disintegrated by 285 AD, and by then the Zhongshanese had already asserted primacy elsewhere along the Yangtze; they swiftly moved in to conquer the west as well.

This Zhongshanese hegemony saw partial reconstruction and relief in the Chinese Mesopotamia, but it was filled with problems from the outset. Dissent lingered, and border threats forced the Zhongshanese to stretch their armies thin. A major blunder was made in the attempt to bring Luoyang to its knees in a naval war; though initially great victories were scored and several Atanamese and Vietnamese colonies were regained, the damage to the trade routes had enraged the Sundanese Ascendancy, which now intervened on Luoyang’s behalf militarily, as did its Atanamese ally Ayutamradvipa (which by then had a major population of defeated Avyaktaragan feudals and warriors fleeing east from Dwipa and Malaya). The Zhongshanese fleet held its ground well, but was eventually defeated at Xisha Qundao by a combined coalition fleet in 307 AD. The Luoyangese had already developed advanced coastal defenses to repulse the raiders, and reconquered Vietnam. As for Ayutamradvipa, it had gradually conquered the already-declining Chinese colonies in northern Atanam, uniting the archipelago and settling down for peaceful commerce. As for the land wars in China, these had only died down in circa 325 AD; the later Luoyangese counteroffensives allowed them to reclaim a fair amount of land, but Zhongshan too had held on to a fair amount of its gains; however, parts of the western Chinese Mesopotamia – where a traditional Mohist revival had occurred – had ended up in an independent state, the Ji Empire. A small autonomous Mohist kingdom within Zhongshan was also allowed to survive in the central regions.

For all of this warfare, this was also an era of new philosophical flowering and technological progress, as already discussed. Zhongshan saw lots of progress in metallurgy, engineering, naval technology and even early mechanics. Luoyang both exported and developed superior shipbuilding and agricultural techniques from Avyaktaraga, and Paramatmanistic ideas played a large part in the neo-Mohist renaissance. Also, the 4th century saw a gradual recovery of the Yangtze valley.

Outside of coastal and restored China, important events occurred as well. The 4th century AD saw two new empires arise; the great Tibetan king Gar Detsen had perfected mountain warfare tactics and warred with neighbouring barbarian tribes; he unified the Tibetan peoples, subjugated the Yue Qi and conquered Kashmir, as well as some other areas. Under his reign, Lhasa became a great centre of Buddhist religious thought and art, and numerous cities were founded. Meanwhile, the northern steppes, disturbed even further by the Xiongnu troubles, saw ever more vicious warfare; as losers fled west across the Eurasian steppe, the Tiele tribal confederacy asserted power in the core Turkic regions and conquered most of the anarchic northern steppe lands of the Xiongnu Empire. The Tungusic Xibe people had, in the meantime, risen to prominence in the east; it too took advantage of Xiongnu deterioration and captured the Khitan core lands, creating a Turko-Tungusic neo-Khitan state (albeit a one strongly influenced by Xiongnu). The Xiongnu Empire was thus limited to the northern Chinese lands along the Huang He, where it has succumbed to tribal strife; by the end of the 4th century AD, though, unity was restored under a new dynasty and the most warlike tribes were reined in. As already said, Korea had gained independence; ideological affinity and past assistance led to it becoming a close ally of Jomon. The Jomonese themselves had been doing rather unevenly through this period, largely remaining on the fringes of history; centralising attempts and religious difficulties – as well as the obvious problems involved in a culture based almost solely on fighting an external enemy that was no longer really there – resulted in a series of brutal civil wars that had incapacitated it for much of the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD. Still, by 289 AD the central authority of the Priestess-Queen in the new capital of Edo was asserted. Subsequently, a religious revival occurred, once again based on the old national traditions; however, contact with the outer world was maintained. The Ainu of Hokkaido were conquered, though actual settlement was largely impractical at the moment; also, the temporary naval weakness of Zhongshan allowed the Jomonese to conquer most of the remaining Zhongshanese island colonies, though the invasion of Taiwan failed miserably and the Zhongshanese subsequently reconquered Cheju. At the same time, trade ties were established with the South Sea states.

OOC:

[1] Aethalia=OTL modern Elba.

[2] Teutonic Coast=appr. OTL Gascony.

[3] Andana=OTL Madagascar.

[4] Tumasik=OTL Singapore.

Apologies for occasional low quality, especially in Europe (I did it last and also happened to rush things a bit, so it kind of figures). Feel free to ask about any extra details I might’ve forgotten about.
 
Lots of ethnic weirdness this turn, and many of the newly-emergent peoples mentioned are probably not quite what you think. I'll really have to write all of those different patterns down one day.
 

Attachments

  • AFSNES I Map 400 AD.GIF
    AFSNES I Map 400 AD.GIF
    101.9 KB · Views: 284
  • AFSNES I CZ Map VI.GIF
    AFSNES I CZ Map VI.GIF
    78.3 KB · Views: 148
OH YEAH, Hessonian DOMINATION.

Who are the (player):

Olive blob north of Thrace
Pink blob to Hessonia's east
Light blue blob to Hessonia's south-East
Grey blob to Hessonia's south
Greenish blob above Olive (German) blob

?

I'd appreciate someone telling me who all the players are so I could open up my diplomatic channels.

Oh and whens the next deadline?
 
Most.Awesome.Update.Ever.

That and everything went to plan, even got my Indian Adventure + successor states! :D
Heh, I'd say quite the opposite. Funny actually, last turn I had no chance to send real orders, hurried in a short section just before the deadline, and got all I asked for and more. This turn I sent well thought-out orders, including a long reply regarding religious issues, and didn't get anything of what I wanted. Still, if was a good update of course, just incredibly frustrating for me personally. :mad:
 
Man I love China in this nes, Great update (although i've only read the east asian section).
 
Is the success of our orders dependant on their quality or luck or what?
 
Excellent excellent update. The Far East kicks serious arse.
 
Back
Top Bottom