Poll: Should we make the these alliances against the Indians?

eyrei · Jan 9, 2003

This is a poll to determine whether we should sign the following alliances against the Indians:

Iroquois

We give gems, 4gpt and world map

Russians

We give a new peace treaty, RoP (the Russians will likely be fighting the Indians in our territory), and incense

Babylonians

We give a new peace treaty and 25gpt.

China

We give 37 gpt

Total cost of alliances: 66gpt, gems, and incense.

Shaitan · Jan 9, 2003

Yes, we've been caught in a knickerankular position (pants around our ankles) and need both assurance against a domino effect and strong distraction for our Indian foes.

Chieftess · Jan 9, 2003

Wow.. 66gpt.. Atleast those gems got us something, and we'll have two more next turn IF we can defend Dapperdan.... That should hopefully get more income for the war effort.

Immortal · Jan 9, 2003

yes, any alliances which will allow us the upper hand in the campaign gets my support.

Fier Canadien · Jan 9, 2003

I voted yes because the Indians are a major threat for our security.

They dared to attack mighty Fanatika, let chaos fall upon them.

Donovan Zoi · Jan 9, 2003

Regarding China:

Keep in mind we can save 200g in the long run as China will also accept 540g up front(instead of 37g x 20= 740g). However, I will not let this minor detail affect my support for this plan, as we can fix it later if you find it appropriate to do so.

I vote YES.

TNG · Jan 9, 2003

I voted yes, so what's after this war?

Zarn · Jan 9, 2003

I looks good for the yes option so far. It looks like we have allies.

GenMarshall · Jan 9, 2003

We should distract the Elepants away from our cities.

*Grand Admiral CivGeneral notices the Elephants are heading for Octavian's Peanut Butter Doughnut stash

eyrei · Jan 10, 2003

Originally posted by Donovan Zoi
Regarding China:

Keep in mind we can save 200g in the long run as China will also accept 540g up front(instead of 37g x 20= 740g). However, I will not let this minor detail affect my support for this plan, as we can fix it later if you find it appropriate to do so.

I vote YES.

We are not offering any civ gold from our treasury, so that, if they break the treaty, they get no more than they gave.

Donovan Zoi · Jan 10, 2003

Good call, eyrei.....you are absolutely right! That will also give us more gold for upgrades and knight rushes.

amirsan · Jan 10, 2003

We should pay the alliances to get those Elephant of our back. If we get all the nations surrounding India then we won't have to worry about building as much military units.

Chieftess · Jan 12, 2003

why does one person always seem to vote no? Must be an Indian agent...

Octavian X · Jan 12, 2003

It's the same person who voted for the last option in this poll.

Zarn · Jan 12, 2003

Originally posted by Chieftess
why does one person always seem to vote no? Must be an Indian agent...

I don't know. Maybe.
*looks at Chieftess suspicously*

Poll: Should we make the these alliances against the Indians?

Should we sign these alliances against the Indians?

Yes

No

Abstain

eyrei

Deity

Shaitan

der Besucher

Chieftess

Moderator

Immortal

Deity

Fier Canadien

Citizen

Donovan Zoi

The Return

TNG

Sad, sad little man

Zarn

Le Républicain Catholique

GenMarshall

High Elven ISB Capt & Ghost Agent

eyrei

Deity

Donovan Zoi

The Return

amirsan

King of all Kings

Chieftess

Moderator

Octavian X

is not a pipe.

Zarn

Le Républicain Catholique

Similar threads