Screw you guys, I'm starting my own religion, with blackjack, and hookers.
Can I come play?Screw you guys, I'm starting my own religion, with blackjack, and hookers.
What might be the rules of play?
Here are the suggested rules so far:
1. no-one is excluded;
2. all rules should be simple and easy to understand;
3. all action should promote the sum total of human happiness;
4. everyone is responsible for his or her own actions. No third party who operates behind the screens and is to be credited with positive outcomes, but remains blameless in case of negative ones;
5. Wittgenstein Proposition (7): Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent.
6. No rule is more important than another and no rule is cast in stone , apart from rule 6?
What do you think? Yeah, waste of time, I know. This'll sink without trace.
Your own logic is inconsistent (surprise!). Why should a rule that explicitly excepts itself apply to itself?Rule 6 is logically inconsistent. It can't even exist due to how contradictory it is. No rule is cast iron, except this one. So since no rule is cast iron, neither is rule six, which makes it pointless and thus the whole point of the thread is pointles also.
What about pretentious German words? (They have all the best ones anyway.)
I agree. You make a very good point. I suggest we amend it. What do you suggest?Rule 6 is logically inconsistent. It can't even exist due to how contradictory it is. No rule is cast iron, except this one. So since no rule is cast iron, neither is rule six, which makes it pointless and thus the whole point of the thread is pointles also.
I propose an election!a vote should be held; (and how you do that, I have no idea.)
How about, if someone would propose an election, I propose it should be seconded, but only after my proposal to second that proposal is seconded.
No, its perfect: Ziggy the Messiah for Pope!!I'm already the leper messiah. Being pope as well would mean a conflict of interest.