Just curious,
1. Why does Viking starts with galleys of Swordman and Axeman?
2. Why don't they start with galleys of Huscarl?
3. Why did you rename Berserker to Huscarl, which is some kind of ...servant (Wiki)?
4. The one that collapse Phoenician are Achaemenid; so why should Greece do that?
5. Why Greece's UP last to the Medieval Era?
And now a technical issues.
I had few Triremes in the open seas near England and Alfred starts at war with me. I sink all their galleys at one turn.
4. No idea what you're talking about.
5. It could get broken if it went any further, but I wouldn't mind having it enabled again for the AI when it respawns.
Um. I think that's a combination of you playing well + good hit rolls in combat,
and not any sort of deficiency on the part of the game.
3) Saying that huscarls are servants is like saying that knights are servants. Technically true, but it really has the wrong implication.Just curious,
1. Why does Viking starts with galleys of Swordman and Axeman?
2. Why don't they start with galleys of Huscarl?
3. Why did you rename Berserker to Huscarl, which is some kind of ...servant (Wiki)?
4. The one that collapse Phoenician are Achaemenid; so why should Greece do that?
5. Why Greece's UP last to the Medieval Era?
They have to control Phoenicia because Alexander did just that. Why should I make it easier for them just because Persia doesn't always conquer Phoenicia in the game? (To be precise since there seems to be a misunderstanding: the Greek goal isn't to collapse Phoenicia, it's to control their core. It's just that Rhye's rules for control required to control at least two cities if the civ in question is still alive, which is obviously impossible. But I've already changed that.)
5) Good question, I think it could end with the Classical Era just as well without changing much, except that long lasting super Greece would be less likely.
Okay then I still don't understand what you're talking about.My concern is not about how often Cyrus defeated Hiram, but how could the Carthage scare Rome if Phoenicia have to be dead first?
My concern is not about how often Cyrus defeated Hiram, but how could the Carthage scare Rome if Phoenicia have to be dead first?
Not all the Historical goals are 'historical' : you often have to be better than the civilization was in the real world. Examples are conquering Britain as Prussia, or spreading Islam to 40% as the Arabs.
But if "to control" is actually to control 2 of their cities,would you please stable the Phoenicia so damn strong so they don't really heavily penalized when losing Sur and Jerusalem (often culture flipped by them) ?
Therefore, if they have to lost their Levant Companions, they are still strong enough to scare Julius
He's really got a point there. I find it very annoying that now that we have Phoenicians we rarely see Carthage. I'd even propose an autofounding and capital shift for Carthage with no stability penalty when it's the AI playing as the Phoenicians.