Your Top Requested Change
- Thread starter dexters
- Start date
i agree there must be a way to intercept bombers carrying nukes as they always get through, despite having a massive airforce.
I would also like to see the re-introduction of annual income, something not seen since civ 2. I liked this simple feature so you could measure your peoples standard of living. GNP means little as to use a real world example. China has a huge one but its people by the large of worse off than most folks in the west.
godotnut
Inverted Unicycle
Improved AI in diplo and unit movement.
KrikkitTwo
Immortal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 12,418
I included both Buff and Weaken Nukes...
Nukes should be a strategic weapon rather than a tactical one... ie no damage to units other than the one targeted.
However, significant damage to the city (ie ICBM=city goes to 1 pop with no non-wonder buildings, Atomic bomb just kills 2/3... and all fallout tiles give 1
to the civ they are in)
Bigger improvements would be AI
Nukes should be a strategic weapon rather than a tactical one... ie no damage to units other than the one targeted.
However, significant damage to the city (ie ICBM=city goes to 1 pop with no non-wonder buildings, Atomic bomb just kills 2/3... and all fallout tiles give 1
to the civ they are in)Bigger improvements would be AI
The AI needs to be improved. It is okay that it is not as tactical as a human, but it should not give its resources away. It should not be giving away gold for resources, open borders and such.
Research Agreements should be adjusted.
It would be nice to set a nuke on counter-attack just like the intercept option for fighters. If the city gets nuked and the origin city is in range it automatically deploys against that city. The current problem is that the nuke gets destroyed when the city is nuked. This would be a simple way of allowing a retaliation.
Research Agreements should be adjusted.
It would be nice to set a nuke on counter-attack just like the intercept option for fighters. If the city gets nuked and the origin city is in range it automatically deploys against that city. The current problem is that the nuke gets destroyed when the city is nuked. This would be a simple way of allowing a retaliation.
AI combat improvement
Thats within your control. I have more fun not selling abusive agreements. If an AI asks for open borders then I may sell them. If an AI demands a lux resource then I will sell it. But otherwise I dont abuse the trading system and I find fairer games. However the combat AI is always lame.
Thats within your control. I have more fun not selling abusive agreements. If an AI asks for open borders then I may sell them. If an AI demands a lux resource then I will sell it. But otherwise I dont abuse the trading system and I find fairer games. However the combat AI is always lame.
OrsonM
Our man
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 555
Changing that logo, of course!
I can't sleep because of it!, I wake up in the middle of the night, go for a wee and then get back to sleep (which I'm sure it's totally unrelated, the logo is keeping me up).
Firaxis if you let your logo be ugly, what else are you letting be ugly in the game?. It's just bad parenting there!
I can't sleep because of it!, I wake up in the middle of the night, go for a wee and then get back to sleep (which I'm sure it's totally unrelated, the logo is keeping me up).
Firaxis if you let your logo be ugly, what else are you letting be ugly in the game?. It's just bad parenting there!
arkguy
Warlord
Elimination of the one resource one unit rule or have it as an option rather than a requirement in the main frame game. Allow resources and improvements on mountain terrain. Better defenses against nukes.
TheMarshmallowBear
Benelovent Chieftain of the Ursu Kingdom
I actually disagree with elimination of one resource one unit rule, it's more realistic (to some extent). I mean, how is it 'real' that you could build 100 tanks with one source of oil anyways?
