He's just being an atheist proselytizer.
This would start a epic flame war on most foruns, but here I think plp will respect your opinion.
I will only say that I disagree.
Not that religion explicitly contributed, but simply that it didn't hinder.
Hmm. Until relatively recently, that is.
Maybe "Evolution" should be a tech that introduces science penalties on any civ whose religion includes tenants of monotheism and fundamentalist?
Oh I know! It would make fatheads feel better about themselves on BOTH sides!Sorry, I don't see anything good that can happen from that.
Yes, religion has been and continues to be an important of history but nothing like the way Civ4 implemented religion (i.e., all generic, no differences).
Theodora would not be a good choice for Byzantine ruler, imo. Civ may be needing more female leaders, but at least Wu Zetian ruled far longer than Theodora (who only ruled 1 year, not counting her time as co-empress with Zoe). They should choose Justinian (the most well known Byzantine Emperor), or Basil II (also well-known and accomplished).
Religion actually helped science for most of its history and in most places,
Religion actually helped science for most of its history and in most places, and is directly responsible for several scientific advances. It's only relatively recently that religion has become sort of the antithesis to scientific progress in people's minds.
Interesting where did you come by that information? Have you ever heard of the Spanish Inquisition? I suppose you feel those mad priests loved innovation? In Christian kingdoms, such as Spain, accusations of heresy and subsequent executions caused many setbacks in scientific research. People in many areas were simply afraid to come forth with something that would go against God's law.
Now under Islam, science was viewed far differently, innovation abounded and scientific research was viewed holistically. So you are right in that many areas research was favored. That is why Islamic nations had more knowledge or were ahead of the game in math, science, medicine, and in the preservation of classical antiquity and studies of earlier cultures, compared to Christian kingdoms. Of course we see this revival of classical antiquity in Spain during the onset of the Reconquista. Although it was a slow process the new world certainly helped to advance the old as time pushed forward.
Moderator Action: Just a general note, please keep the off-topic discussion to our OT forum, and the history discussion to our World History forum, which are both perfectly functional.
I wonder if there will be a limit on religions possible to found in a game depending on the Size. For example Small 3-4, Standard 4-5, Large 5-6, etc.
Perhaps I don't understand the mechanics well enough, but it seems otherwise everyone will want to found their own religion and there won't be any positive relations of nations with one another and rather another negative bonus against one another (Making is harder for the AI to like someone).