Acken
Deity
@ThorHammerz
First I'm not sure who is "we" in your post since my post wasn't directed at a crowd, nor to you but to the person's post just above mine.
For the content of your post I have no idea why you quoted me or if you just misunderstand but I have said nothing opposite to what you just stated nor disagree with your statements (you said mostly that the AI is weak and would like it to be improved).
To makes things clear, my previous post just wanted to make clear the dichotomy used by the previous poster that civ5 is in the same category as sim city while civ4 is with Dota in terms of competitiveness is just a ridiculous statement. That is all I said (or wanted to say) there. Civ4 is only harder than Civ5, that's all there is to it. It's not in some sort of different category.
What I wanted to say after that was only that Civ5 players recognize issues the game has (AI, balance etc) but ultimately still find the game more fun than Civ4. Civ4 players on the other hand feel these issues are too much for their own enjoyment (or don't like some of the features like 1UPT) and therefore prefer Civ4 for what it does better or differently.
I don't see any miscommunication there.
First I'm not sure who is "we" in your post since my post wasn't directed at a crowd, nor to you but to the person's post just above mine.
For the content of your post I have no idea why you quoted me or if you just misunderstand but I have said nothing opposite to what you just stated nor disagree with your statements (you said mostly that the AI is weak and would like it to be improved).
To makes things clear, my previous post just wanted to make clear the dichotomy used by the previous poster that civ5 is in the same category as sim city while civ4 is with Dota in terms of competitiveness is just a ridiculous statement. That is all I said (or wanted to say) there. Civ4 is only harder than Civ5, that's all there is to it. It's not in some sort of different category.
What I wanted to say after that was only that Civ5 players recognize issues the game has (AI, balance etc) but ultimately still find the game more fun than Civ4. Civ4 players on the other hand feel these issues are too much for their own enjoyment (or don't like some of the features like 1UPT) and therefore prefer Civ4 for what it does better or differently.
I don't see any miscommunication there.