and [plain][/plain] to show tags without the need to neuter them, as in
[plain][s]strike this[/s][/plain]
shows
[s]strike this[/s]
which means
strike this
[plain][s]strike this[/s][/plain]
shows
[s]strike this[/s]
which means
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Thread starter Thunderfall
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2001
- Messages
- 30,085
Abaddon
Deity
Couldn't that have been a PM or a wall post?
@Anyone.. where can I get the complete list of fonts usable on this site?
@Anyone.. where can I get the complete list of fonts usable on this site?
No, because others may be interested as well...(since someone else mentioning it caused me to ask the question).
Abaddon
Deity
Well it certainly should not be in the FAQ of Site Feedback.. if it actually had anywhere on the forum, it would be the avatar thread in OT.
To the best of my knowledge, the person I asked the question to does not visit that thread in OT. And I would say that commenting or asking a question about an administrator of this site's public image is in fact part of site feedback. After all, the administrators are an important part of this site. It's much like many people have asked TF about his avatar.
But as to why I'm rationalizing my question to you, I'm not sure...because this certainly has nothing to do with Site Feedback.
Abaddon
Deity
Because someone does not visit a thread is not an excuse to avoid using it. If we all used that rational, everyone would posy whatever they like, wherever they like.
You can try and think up of an excuse, but quite simply there is a thread for avatar discussion, so thats where avatar discussion should go. If you are worried the person you wish to talk to won't see it, alert them via wall post of pm. It is not an excuse to simply post where they have recently post.
You can try and think up of an excuse, but quite simply there is a thread for avatar discussion, so thats where avatar discussion should go. If you are worried the person you wish to talk to won't see it, alert them via wall post of pm. It is not an excuse to simply post where they have recently post.
Okay, I'll bite - does your post that I'm quoting have anything to do with FAQ and Site Feedback, or everything to do with commenting on a specific member which this thread is nothing about?
Don't be a hypocrite. And as I said, if everyone wants to ask questions of the admins in SF, I don't think that would be too much of a problem, so sure, everyone can use my rationale if they'd like.
Abaddon
Deity
You bit a long time ago 
An of course, you are right. All these posts have been a derail. However, I don't think it was wrong of me to point out where you should post such a comment... perhaps I should have done it as a report to the mods..
We are both guilty of then happily fuelling the derail train for several posts.
An of course, you are right. All these posts have been a derail. However, I don't think it was wrong of me to point out where you should post such a comment... perhaps I should have done it as a report to the mods..
We are both guilty of then happily fuelling the derail train for several posts.
That's enough guys.
aimeeandbeatles
watermelon
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2007
- Messages
- 20,082
did the moderators put me on mute or something? I dont think anyone sees my posts . Hello out there!
Don't take it personally, they are very busy.
Sometimes they forget to reply or just don't see it right away.
aimeeandbeatles
watermelon
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2007
- Messages
- 20,082
They must have unmuted me.
GhostWriter16
Deity
Just for curiosity, don't answer if you don't want to.
Do the admins (Ainwood and Padma) have any old infractions or do they have a perfect record?
Do the admins (Ainwood and Padma) have any old infractions or do they have a perfect record?
They became mods before the infraction system existed.
But I don't think that's really an appropriate question to be asking, or a very useful one. This thread is supposed to be for questions about the site to which people actually need the answers, not idle speculation about particular individuals.
But I don't think that's really an appropriate question to be asking, or a very useful one. This thread is supposed to be for questions about the site to which people actually need the answers, not idle speculation about particular individuals.
GhostWriter16
Deity
Random individuals, absolutely not.
The admins on the other hand, I'd consider them part of the site as some user pointed out
However, I was just curious.
As for the infraction system, what did you guys do before it existed? Also, did it take any trial and error to get the right system or has it always been this way?
Mathilda
Queen
The infraction system was introduced in November 2006.
There were a couple of minor tweaks in the beginning but nothing major.
There were a couple of minor tweaks in the beginning but nothing major.
GhostWriter16
Deity
Then what did they do prior to that? Just have the mods ban "Troublesome" users? Mentally keep track of offenses?
Similar threads
