I would agree, to an extent. It's easier to govern when you are directly effected by that region. That's why states are more pleasantly run than countries.
Obviously, sir, you've never spent any time in Australia.
... or something like that. somone once said it, I think it may have been Churchill referring to India. anyway, you get the gist of it. Any thoughts?
... or something like that. somone once said it, I think it may have been Churchill referring to India. anyway, you get the gist of it. Any thoughts?
That's why states are more pleasantly run than countries.
I agree.Any thoughts?
If a girl was repeatedly raped during a major developmental stage in her life you wouldn't expect her to be very good at self-governance (i.e. : having good control over her life) right away. Such is the case w/ much of Africa (and just as in the case of child abuse, some nations recovering are better from the colonial violations than others).I completely disagree. My sole piece of evidence that is needed to explain this is Africa.
Generally. Except New York state.
Generally. Except New York state.
Here, Hear! (which is it?) I lived there for 14 years, can't tell you how glad I am to be out.
I disagree, bad self government is inferior to good government.
Here, Hear! (which is it?) I lived there for 14 years, can't tell you how glad I am to be out.
I completely disagree. My sole piece of evidence that is needed to explain this is Africa.