Granted, it all makes very good sense, except when I research the human/homo sapiens in particular. Is there a chance there was an extraterrestrial influence on the-sudden/before it's time- appearance of the modern humans on Earth?
Granted, it all makes very good sense, except when I research the human/homo sapiens in particular. Is there a chance there was an extraterrestrial influence on the-sudden/before it's time- appearance of the modern humans on Earth?
Nope. Next thread.
You are quite lacking of intellectual vision, let's just say, quite one dimensional.
Granted, it all makes very good sense, except when I research the human/homo sapiens in particular. Is there a chance there was an extraterrestrial influence on the-sudden/before it's time- appearance of the modern humans on Earth?
So when do you think humans should have appeared? Hadn't Earth finished cleaning the streaky glasses in the dishwasher yet?Granted, it all makes very good sense, except when I research the human/homo sapiens in particular. Is there a chance there was an extraterrestrial influence on the-sudden/before it's time- appearance of the modern humans on Earth?
Perhaps the Pak were involved.Granted, it all makes very good sense, except when I research the human/homo sapiens in particular. Is there a chance there was an extraterrestrial influence on the-sudden/before it's time- appearance of the modern humans on Earth?
"Before it's time"? How so. Humans evolved right when the conditions were right for it.Granted, it all makes very good sense, except when I research the human/homo sapiens in particular. Is there a chance there was an extraterrestrial influence on the-sudden/before it's time- appearance of the modern humans on Earth?
There is the explosion-like cranial development. So much growth in so little time is quit the outlier in evolutionary history."Before it's time"? How so.
"Before it's time"? How so. Humans evolved right when the conditions were right for it.
I don't see any reason to believe that we are the product of alien tinkering. I don't know you but I do have one friend who subscribes to such beliefs (I call him a friend despite his various crazynesses because he's a good guy overall & visited me when I was in severe pain in the hospital) and it seems to stem from the intense desire to be/feel special (instead of chosen by God we're chosen by godlike alien).
What is this "natural schedule" you keep talking about? When do you contend humans should have appeared?Thanks for the kind words. We're all crazy, don't you know?
So you presume the appearance of Homo Sapiens was the effect of Creation (the God mention)? I'm still inclined to believe that Homo Sapiens appeared thousands of years ahead of the natural schedule. I do not believe enough archeological evidence has been collected to deny this line of thinking.
No doubt.Thanks for the kind words. We're all crazy, don't you know?
No, I'm atheist.So you presume the appearance of Homo Sapiens was the effect of Creation (the God mention)?
There is no evidence collected to support the line of thinking though.I'm still inclined to believe that Homo Sapiens appeared thousands of years ahead of the natural schedule. I do not believe enough archeological evidence has been collected to deny this line of thinking.
Indeed. Yet for hundreds of thousands of years (actually millions) after the development of tool use nothing much happened. Then, all of a sudden, about 10,000 years ago: organized agriculture. Now that pretty much spread like wildfire. Evolutionary changes, however, do not.
I don't think that's entirely correct.
One thing to note is increasingly sophisticated art seems to precede agriculture by 10s of thousands of years.
Another thing is agriculture was probably invented multiple times over the course of history.
It seems more likely that the Mesoamericans didn't copy agriculture from the Mesopotamians but created it independently. That's why they grew corn not wheat.