Lars_Domus
Say No 2 Net Validations
Well, if I was forced to play a scenario, I guess I'd pick Charlemagne.
Why would you have to be forced if you played Final Frontier once that would be the only thing you'd play.
Great:
NEXT WAR
FINAL FRONTIER
WWII
Good:
Rhye's and Fall
Defense
bad:
After world
Charlemagne
Broken Star
Crossroads of the World
FfH Age of Ice
Gods of old
Rhye's and Fall all the way. The Stability system requires some smart moves on the part of the player in order to survive and the random events can be interesting if infrequent. Also the replayability is one of its strengths. The only weakness I see in this is the improper balance, Arabia and Turkey tend to dominate most of the games in terms of size, and Russia if under AI never reaches the Pacific. Some of these aspects disturb me, but I guess it would not be much fun if the game was like a rail shooter. I would still like to see more correlation with history yet though.