Another WW2-Global PBEM

bigbill0126 · Apr 18, 2005

Ok some months ago (more than a year i think) i tried to set up a ww2 pbem using an old scenario, and it wouldn't work for some ppl and everything came crashing down around my head. But now i have thought to try and start another pbem, but this time using the amazing WW2-Global Multiplayer 1.0 scenario file. I will take the United Kingdom, and my friend Ryan will take France. So here is the countires and players as they stand:

1. Nazi Germany - Spartaca
2. Soviet Russia - <not filled>
3. Nuetrals - AI
4. China - TechGuy
5. Japan - WvCivNut
6. Great Britain - Bill
7. France - Ryan
8. United States - JG99_Korab

We may have to debate over some small rule variations (such as whether or not to have rifleman be able to execute amphibious assaults) but as long as u download the huge art files and the singleplayer version works for you, then this game will to. Post what countires u want or email me at :
Bigbill0126@aol.com

Hope we can get this one started!

Spartaca · Apr 19, 2005

Hi,

I'll play Germany if you like. I too was trying to get a WW2 Global multiplayer game going too but without any takers yet. So I'd be happy to play here. Here is my link.

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=116822

WVCivnut · Apr 20, 2005

I'd like to try Japan. This will be my first PBEM game but Im a long time player of scenerios (WWII Global since 1.5) and hotseat games.

bigbill0126 · Apr 21, 2005

Ok guys sounds good. Lets see if we can get anyone to take Russia, China, or the United States.

TechGuy · Apr 22, 2005

I'll play China.

Michellin · Apr 22, 2005

Hi everyone!

I´m interested in joining!
First of all, do I need C3C? I "only" have PTW.

If PTW is enough, then asign me any nation you want!

/M

Spartaca · Apr 22, 2005

Hi Michellin,

You have to have C3C with patch 1.22

bigbill0126 · Apr 23, 2005

Yeh sorry, you do need conquests for this scenario. I wanted to put it in the first post, but i forgot to.

Techguy: That would be great if you would play as China. Now we only have two more spots to fill.

JG99_Korab · Apr 26, 2005

Hey. I will play UnitedStates

JG99_Korab · Apr 26, 2005

I guess you can get the stuff here PS:I hope that Dazz G doesn't mind me copying part of his post
[http://forums.civfanatics.com/showp...93&postcount=1]

[http://forums.civfanatics.com/showp...&postcount=361]

The first link is for the huge download necessary to run any version of the scenario ... you can also get the single player biq file here.

The second link is for the multiplayer biq needed to take part in this PBEM.

You should follow the download instructions and make sure you can get the scenario to work ... please confirm when you have successfully got it to work.

Please note ... Patch 1.22 required.

Spartaca · Apr 26, 2005

I don't think that the links above work anymore. Try here.

The huge download file necessary to run any version of the scenario can be found here.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showt...98&page=1&pp=20

The multiplayer game is found here:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showt...012#post2465012

bigbill0126 · Apr 26, 2005

hey thanks for posting the links guys, and JG99_Korab you are in for the united states. I will give this post a little more time to see if anyone wants to join in as the soviet union. If we can find a player, that would be great, but we can always have them be an AI as a last resort. I think i am going to turn off military alliances in this scenario, because i don't think its fair for either side to goad the neutrals into war. Do you guys want to give all the standard infantry units the amphibious assault ability, or keep that solely for the marine units?

Spartaca · Apr 26, 2005

I like amphibious assault by infantry but can live without it if I have to.

JG99_Korab · Apr 27, 2005

first of all I think we should have military alliances on because the game won't be very realistic without and that marines should be the only ones aloud with the water landing. And, If we have Ai as SR then I think the game will go a bit faster and I really would like that.

bigbill0126 · Apr 27, 2005

When i said turning off military alliances, i meant keeping the loocked alliances in place, but turning off the ability for countries to very cheaply make the neutrals declare war on their enemeis. This in itself is not realistic at all, because they were neutral during the war. I will still give it a day or two and see if someone wants to join as the russians, but we have filled all the countires that i thought were necessary for a good pbem game.

JG99_Korab · Apr 27, 2005

rgr. Ok i c

Spartaca · Apr 27, 2005

We must be just about ready to start. Let's get it on!

bigbill0126 · Apr 27, 2005

lets just give it another day to see if another person joins for russia

JG99_Korab · Apr 28, 2005

I think you should go ahead and start. Because Russia Acted really weird in the war anyways

Spartaca · Apr 28, 2005

Just wondering. If there is no amphibious assault by infantry, how do Germany, Britain and France make amphibious assaults? Unlike Japan and the USA, I don't think they have the ability to make marines.

Another WW2-Global PBEM

Chieftain

King

King

Chieftain

Prince

Chieftain

King

Chieftain

King

King

King

Chieftain

King

King

Chieftain

King

King

Chieftain

King

King

Similar threads