Peaceful Civ
Chieftain
I bought the G&K Strategy Guide from Brady Games a couple months back, and was prepared to buy one for BNW (not so sure anymore). This guide is filled to the brim with what I feel is noobish advice that actually had me facepalming from cover to cover. Maybe it's just me, that I'm the noob, but some of the things they recommend seem a little off to me. I actually can't believe that people actually pay for some of the advice I have read. The thing is, I have several Brady guides and generally find them to be somewhat helpful.
Here is just one of things that I don't really get (I have to copy everything myself straight from the book, but I'll try to add more later):
"Sweden's Nobel is tremendous, particularly with the new Great Person rules in the Gods & Kings expansion since Great Persons can no longer be expended for Golden Ages. 90 influence is about the equivalent of a 1000 Gold gift to a City-State and will make a huge difference in the speed at which you can acquire City-State allies."
The only time I can see this as being useful is either endgame, or in special maps. A great merchant would be a big waste - a trade mission would grant you influence and gold. A great artist could pop a golden age and then you could simply buy influence. A great general, maybe (Archipelago)? A great admiral, maybe (Pangaea)? A great scientist, endgame? A great engineer, endgame? The thing is, many of these great persons only seem disposable in the endgame, and by then I am (usually) rolling in gold (not to mention past the point of needing City-States).
I won't say that Sweden's UA is terrible, as I haven't been playing long enough to make that call (just under 400 hours), but it certainly offers nothing that can't be acquired by other Civs, albeit at a price - but with Sweden, the price seems even greater, somehow, despite the fact that it's a UA. In any case, I believe calling Sweden's UA "tremendous", and at another part, "the most powerful diplomatic passive in the game", a bit of a stretch.
Am I missing something or does the guide not know what it's talking about?
Here is just one of things that I don't really get (I have to copy everything myself straight from the book, but I'll try to add more later):
"Sweden's Nobel is tremendous, particularly with the new Great Person rules in the Gods & Kings expansion since Great Persons can no longer be expended for Golden Ages. 90 influence is about the equivalent of a 1000 Gold gift to a City-State and will make a huge difference in the speed at which you can acquire City-State allies."
The only time I can see this as being useful is either endgame, or in special maps. A great merchant would be a big waste - a trade mission would grant you influence and gold. A great artist could pop a golden age and then you could simply buy influence. A great general, maybe (Archipelago)? A great admiral, maybe (Pangaea)? A great scientist, endgame? A great engineer, endgame? The thing is, many of these great persons only seem disposable in the endgame, and by then I am (usually) rolling in gold (not to mention past the point of needing City-States).
I won't say that Sweden's UA is terrible, as I haven't been playing long enough to make that call (just under 400 hours), but it certainly offers nothing that can't be acquired by other Civs, albeit at a price - but with Sweden, the price seems even greater, somehow, despite the fact that it's a UA. In any case, I believe calling Sweden's UA "tremendous", and at another part, "the most powerful diplomatic passive in the game", a bit of a stretch.
Am I missing something or does the guide not know what it's talking about?