Indeed!Lurker's Comment: Yeah, you can't belittle that kind of graphical coolness.
Thlayli said:Also Chand, me and Iggy both agree that you should totally hijack EVE Online screenshots for update purposes.
Of course - By my clock, it's still Thursday night.I think I'll sign up as a corporation, but I still need to finalize the details on it. Chand, is it ok if I send in orders tomorrow morning?
It does look pretty cool, but will probably also deviate from what each ship has in the stats. I probably won't assign each ship class to a graphic myself, but if a designer wants to do so, I can list it in the stats. As to using that sort of art in the update, I'll definitely consider it.Here are some examples:
OOC: That or they will be modified to fit them. The Constitution is relatively limited in scope but what it does say overrides all State laws on the subject. Citizens' rights are part of that, and accordingly must be accommodated. What it doesn't cover is left to the States, provided it doesn't conflict. For example, assuming Japan still retains Article 9, it can keep that, since it isn't controlling military forces (other than its National Guard, which can't be used for offensive purposes anyway).OOC: So all of Southern America along with Africa fulfill those Democratic/Social requirements?
OOC: It seemed extremely obvious? You are aware of the definition of a federation, right? Chandra knew, and by extension so did the countries who signed up. The setup is no different than any of the 24 existent federations today, several of whom are members (including Russia, Brazil, India, and America), just on a larger scale. Technically any type of government can exist on the State level so long as it is responsible to and selected by the people, be it a Constitutional Monarchy or a Communism (with a fair capability for multiple parties or free political input, admittedly) or whatever. Most of the major ideological states (like North Korea, Cuba, Angola, Iran, etc.) have fallen or been democratized in the intervening period. I'm sort of failing to see the problem here.OOC: Well, why didn't you drop this bombshell earlier?