- Joined
- Mar 26, 2007
- Messages
- 7,920
Very well said Laserburn!
Let me just add that Microsoft's operating systems are behind Linux in every market from the smallest portable device to the largest super computer with the sole exception of the desktop.
Microsoft can't continue the old closed source, closed file standards, embrace, extend and extinguish strategy with regard to open standards. They have opened their source code a little and have honestly embraced open standards a bit more too, but they will have to do far more of it and they still won't be able to compete with Linux, GNU General Public License (free software) and open source (Open Source Initiative).
I'm just really happy that we have always had an Open Internet based on Open Source. Can you imagine what a Microsoft controlled Internet would be like? You would have to use all closed standards that Microsoft controls, pay maybe $0.10 per MB transferred and pay extra for (throttled) speed increases. BTW, Microsoft has patent on device speed throttling already; they probably see no viable way of making people pay for more speed that wouldn't cost them more in bad PR in the long term, otherwise they probably would utilize that patent to make everyone's hard drive or Internet access speed slow and offer a fee for full speed access.
Sun Tzu Wu
Let me just add that Microsoft's operating systems are behind Linux in every market from the smallest portable device to the largest super computer with the sole exception of the desktop.
Microsoft can't continue the old closed source, closed file standards, embrace, extend and extinguish strategy with regard to open standards. They have opened their source code a little and have honestly embraced open standards a bit more too, but they will have to do far more of it and they still won't be able to compete with Linux, GNU General Public License (free software) and open source (Open Source Initiative).
I'm just really happy that we have always had an Open Internet based on Open Source. Can you imagine what a Microsoft controlled Internet would be like? You would have to use all closed standards that Microsoft controls, pay maybe $0.10 per MB transferred and pay extra for (throttled) speed increases. BTW, Microsoft has patent on device speed throttling already; they probably see no viable way of making people pay for more speed that wouldn't cost them more in bad PR in the long term, otherwise they probably would utilize that patent to make everyone's hard drive or Internet access speed slow and offer a fee for full speed access.
Sun Tzu Wu