MorteEterna
Prince
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 332
Everything I said about them is applicable to both Multi and Single player. I have beaten the best players with the Egyptians. I can out tech the best Chinese/Japanese players with the Egyptians.
If you want me to stop calling you an idiot then stop saying such stupid things. And stop telling people what civs are/aren't good based on your personal opinion. You're terrible with the Egyptians, we get it. But that doesn't mean that they are a bad civ. You just don't know how to play them. Someone who really knows how to play them can out tech someone who really knows how to play as the Chinese. Even the programmers/testers for this game made comments to how the Egyptians are over powered in tech. And if you know how to work the tech you can't be beaten.
Seriously. Play a game as whatever civ YOU think is the best at tech, feel free to reset the start point until you get something good and let us know when you reach modern. I have hit modern in 0 AD in multiplayer against the best players while they are attacking me the whole time and a top tier Chinese player was turtleing and teching and not being attacked. Without Colossus.
Then, don't tell me I'm an idiot when you say good players that don't know how to play these civs. With chinese, you can do much more than egyptians, I played both, and perhaps in those games you rushed colossus with luck getting a free great builder. That's luck, again. And, I know how to use them, I won 1 city challenge with them on deity, then I tried on multiplayer and really slow because I couldn't do much more than my enemies. I had 3 technologies less than my enemy, I was going to win (I had 25 technologies) then it disconnected me. However, modern era by 0 AD means nothing if you need luck every time. And now don't tell me you can starting with stonehenge reach modern era with no deserts, because that's all about luck. What's your gamertag if you play on x360? What players have you played against?