this is gonna suck....i REALLY hope it isnt playing as barbarians or mobile cities....
I understand the disliking of playing as barbarians, but, what's wrong with mobile cities?
this is gonna suck....i REALLY hope it isnt playing as barbarians or mobile cities....
I understand the disliking of playing as barbarians, but, what's wrong with mobile cities?
Yeah, I hope it's something that isn't stupid, mobile cities would be completely unfair, and playing as Barbarians would be bleh.
You know, receiving a copy of a unique luxury resource for a building is something that has never been done before...
*crosses fingers for glassblower*
how do you develop resources? do i mine some gold and then abandon it for another civ? it seems distinctly pointless, particularly in the modern age when there is practically no room to settle new cities of any note
And what exactly is a city to do when its time to move its "Great Wall"?
And what exactly is a city to do when its time to move its "Great Wall"?
My guess is you play as Enrico Dandolo who is blind so the screen is black the whole time.
And what exactly is a city to do when its time to move its "Great Wall"?
Hmm... interesting clue. We have seen what we expect to be Venice have multiple cities. Did they capture the others and start as an OCC - the map doesn't seem to suggest that.
I am not sure what could be so out of the box... I know in Civ 4 we could play as barbarians. I know we have proposed a completely mobile civ before (when talking about the Huns). Seems a bit strange though to have a completely mobile civ, when we have some more mobile civs already sedentary though.
-----------------------