Well, at least you caught up with older fans having to wait 5 years between civs
No just kidding, if it was less than 5 years it would feel rushed.
Don't forget the profit expansion packs released between changes in Roman Numerals ...
That, except most of the $$$ and power and influence in the world is in the hands of old men.
There is an expression "Age and treachery will overcome youth and skill." Not sure of the source, however.
13
started with civ 4 because rev looked too simple lol
Compared to computer civ, it is.
Well I'm right in the most popular group, so I don't feel so bad
Popular?
Are we voting for the age we WISH we were?
I will have to go change my vote!
1 person over 61, 1 under 10, this is how it should be
did you expect the age distribution to be normal too? interestingly it isn't, there is a flat region between ages of 35 to 55
Population age distributions certainly are not normal (or not Gaussian, I am not calling anyone abnormal). In the past, they were triangular (big young, progressively smaller old, except for occasional "baby booms"). Male and female age triangles side by side generate population pyramids.
In modern societies, lower birth rates and lower death rates (more living longer) are making age distributions more rectangular ... this is what is bankrupting US Social Security, and other pension programs ...
(End of demographics lesson ... this educational content required by FCC regulation 2003388 for CFC to retain its license in the ether ... )
And its 54 for me. Started, oh, late 1980's I think (or early 90's, or whatever fits) ... with Civ II ... I got to Civ from Chess, via Warlords II (anyone else remember "Greetings, Warlord!")
dV