Requests for new components (and features)
- Thread starter Cammagno
- Start date
Psyringe
Scout
Yay - thanks!
That's a place I wouldn't have looked at in ages. 
You bet!
File will be put to use immediately. 
I can't sing, (believe me when I say that), and I have two left feet.Is there anything you can't do?
ruff_hi
Live 4ever! Or die trying
and the ability to change ID pics at will.I can't sing, (believe me when I say that), and I have two left feet.
ruff_hi
Live 4ever! Or die trying
you know, I have a sneaking suspicion that the current pic is the real LM ... and all of the other pic changes are just a smoke screen so that no one actually realizes ... well, LM ... the gig us up!!
No, I don't believe that Lemon is Chrissie Hynde's alias, but that certainly would help out the "Celebrities Who Play Civ" thread.
I could never in a million years be even one one hundredth as cool as Chrissie. Never.No, I don't believe that Lemon is Chrissie Hynde's alias, but that certainly would help out the "Celebrities Who Play Civ" thread.
I am such a fudging' geek. I'm teaching myself Python, C++, and Lua for God's sake.
But for Ruff's piece of mind, I picked the picture because yes, it does look exactly like moi, right down to the haircut.
...it does look exactly like moi, right down to the haircut.
Really? How was the soup?
ruff_hi
Live 4ever! Or die trying
I once saw the pretenders play Macquaurie Bar ... the Best Tutorial in Town.No, I don't believe that Lemon is Chrissie Hynde's alias, but that certainly would help out the "Celebrities Who Play Civ" thread.
Correction: Beaver stew.Really? How was the soup?
Incorrigible? Well, I suppose it's better than what my Ma called me.You're incorrigable. I like that.
_alphaBeta_
King
I thought I saw something about pre-chop being fixed in a thread or the changelog. Can't find it at the moment. In any event, the problem of ungrouped workers and pre-chop (inner most quote above) persists as of BULL r200.
Understand my idea of "auto ungrouping" is complex. Would it be any better to have an option to simply ungroup all workers on a tile when an improvement is completed? Would accomplish the same goal.
First of all let me say I'm a big fan of what you BUG guys (or was it just EF? 
) did with the interface for warnings about hammer decay. In my mind the idea I'm giving you below is similar in some ways.
When a culture-producing building reaches 1000 years of age it doubles its cultural output. In games where culture in a city becomes important, and where precise information about a city's cultural output in the near future becomes handy to know, it'd be great to have in the city screen when mousing over a building, something like "Built in X AD/BC". I figure since it's easy yet tedious enough for the player to simply record whenever a building is built, it would be a valid addition to BUG.
) did with the interface for warnings about hammer decay. In my mind the idea I'm giving you below is similar in some ways.When a culture-producing building reaches 1000 years of age it doubles its cultural output. In games where culture in a city becomes important, and where precise information about a city's cultural output in the near future becomes handy to know, it'd be great to have in the city screen when mousing over a building, something like "Built in X AD/BC". I figure since it's easy yet tedious enough for the player to simply record whenever a building is built, it would be a valid addition to BUG.
EmperorFool
Deity
Done. You'll see the year each building was built and how many years until its culture (each commerce actually) doubles if it will in the future. While I would like the effect to show exactly how much the commerce value will increase, taking into account the city's modifiers, I don't have the time to do that at the moment.
EmperorFool
Deity
Fixed in r212. I'm a little worried about including this with so little play-testing, but I tried a few cases, and it seems to work.
Awesome. Thanks. I was assuming, and hope it was indeed the case, that this was something fairly straight forward.
About showing the exact increase, I wouldn't worry about that - the main thing is knowing what year it is the "commerce" doubling occurs, because it can't be worked out unless it's explicitly recorded in advance.
EmperorFool
Deity
Yes, it was pretty easy to do. The original owner and build time are stored for each building type, and the number of years before each commerce doubles is part of the building definition.
I was tempted to work out the number of turns before it doubles, but the SDK doesn't provide a function to go from years to turns--only turns to years--and I didn't want to bother looping to get the answer even though it would have been fairly simple.
I was tempted to work out the number of turns before it doubles, but the SDK doesn't provide a function to go from years to turns--only turns to years--and I didn't want to bother looping to get the answer even though it would have been fairly simple.
Similar threads
