I wonder if it would also be possible vote for civs we want removed or at least traded out from the game [cough] Zulu[cough]?
I wonder if it would also be possible vote for civs we want removed or at least traded out from the game [cough] Zulu[cough]?
I wonder if it would also be possible vote for civs we want removed or at least traded out from the game [cough] Zulu[cough]?
8) Sumeria with Sargon
- I have always seen Sumer a more important and interesting Mesopotamian Civ than Babylon, Assyria or Persia. sargon would be most fitting as the leader and Sumerian UA should focus on great musician/great works and ziggurat as a granary replacement. Enkidu warrior which has some kind of faith bonus would be the best UU.
If I could pikc any
The Sioux (a given)
No idea who else I would choose, I guess Papal States
Or Kongo
1) Kongo with Nkuwu Nzinga
- Would be the one and only Civ from the dark "heart of the Africa" and only second sub-saharan civ.
2) Pueblo with Pôpe
- Eventhough the Pueblo Council is against this, I would really want to see espionage focused mountain dwellers led by Pôpe in CiV. A truly fascinating Civ.
3) Mississippi/Muscogee/Shawnee = A Native American Civ related to the Hopewell/Mound Builder cultures.
- A bonus to Food/Culture/Faith with strong river bias. Can only imagine how cool this civ would be!
4) Sioux with Sitting Bull
- I know, already my third Native American Civ, but I just love them and all of them could be made truly unique/different from each other.
5) Khazaria with Bulan Sabriel or Joseph ben Aaron
- Khazars would be a real gem for CiV. Muchly unknown trading kingdom in Eurasia with at least dozen different religions where as Judaism and Tengriism were the dominating ones.
6) Vietnam with Lê Thánh Tông
- A Civ with almost five thousand years of history. My favorite Asian civ choice.
7) Timurid/Kushan/Mughal/Tibet = Central Asia.
- One of these really interesting central asian civs should (must) make it's way to CiV.
8) Sumeria with Sargon
- I have always seen Sumer a more important and interesting Mesopotamian Civ than Babylon, Assyria or Persia. sargon would be most fitting as the leader and Sumerian UA should focus on great musician/great works and ziggurat as a granary replacement. Enkidu warrior which has some kind of faith bonus would be the best UU.
9) Romania with Vlad Tepes
- The one and only European Civ I would love to see being added (as Finland is already covered with Sweden and HRE with Charlemagne is too much of an overlap with both Austria and Germany already in game). Eventhough Vlad's dark fame I see him as the best and most interesting leader choice. The Romanian music theme, art and leaderscreen surely would be very unique/cool.
I don't think he is the only one who views Sumeria in general as a more interesting civ than Assyria and Babylon. I sort of view it in a similar fashion as well and this was a popular sentiment during Civ 4 discussions too.
Sumeria could be argued as the earliest heavily urbanized civilization in the world too, with cities reaching into the tens of thousands in the 3rd millennia BCE
A Civ that exist for over 2 thousand years and proved to be the heartland for the later Akkadian, Babylonian, etc. empires with religion, city state tradition policy that lived for the next 5 millennia, etc. is one of the best arguments one could make for a civ
It could EASILY be argued that Sumeria is more significant than Assyria
Neither was Venice.The Papal States were not a Civilization.
9) Romania with Vlad Tepes
- The one and only European Civ I would love to see being added (as Finland is already covered with Sweden and HRE with Charlemagne is too much of an overlap with both Austria and Germany already in game). Eventhough Vlad's dark fame I see him as the best and most interesting leader choice. The Romanian music theme, art and leaderscreen surely would be very unique/cool.