Red Stranger
Emperor
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2005
- Messages
- 1,678
I have an idea that is a combination of Republican and Democrat politics towards Iraq. Republicans don't want to set a timeline for withdrawing and believe that we must stay until the job is done. The Democrats wants to withdraw as quickly as possible regardless of the consequences.
My idea is to combine both ideas. First we announce a withdrawal date, let's say Jan 31, 2008. The terrorists will prepare their attack for that day. Meanwhile they'll be reducing their attacks to give us a sense of security and also to prepare for a major attack that day. But the trick is on Jan 31, 2008, we don't withdraw, but actually engage in full combat with the terrorists. That way we'll be fighting a conventional war which no one can beat us on, and meanwhile we'll have a full year of reduced or no attacks.
My idea is to combine both ideas. First we announce a withdrawal date, let's say Jan 31, 2008. The terrorists will prepare their attack for that day. Meanwhile they'll be reducing their attacks to give us a sense of security and also to prepare for a major attack that day. But the trick is on Jan 31, 2008, we don't withdraw, but actually engage in full combat with the terrorists. That way we'll be fighting a conventional war which no one can beat us on, and meanwhile we'll have a full year of reduced or no attacks.