The new face of knowledge dependency: Starting a misinformed thread on CFC
Of course. This is the way society has taken care of it for thousands of years. Through private efforts and the church.
To facilitate and support these efforts local and even state governments participate. This is the proper form of private/public efforts.
Evil central government however, seeks to expand its power by seizing control supposedly in the name of charity and goodness but in fact only as a method to further enchain the people and extinguish the failing embers of liberty from the land.
Meals on Wheel is a non-profit organization that relies on volunteers and is primarily funded by private donations.
http://www.meals-on-wheels.com/FAQs
Yep, I can't wait until my volunteer time with Meals on Wheels comes with a government paycheck. Hopefully, I will get some back pay.Obviously Federal socialists are in the process of usurping this program, using socialist controlled media to prepare the public. Incremental creep.
The sheeple around here are incapable of thinking on the level necessary to see the insipid designs of evil. It falls therefore to me to sound the alarm.
Oh please you saw a news story, immediately thought it was a socialist program, and made a topic. You ended up being wrong and to save face tried to make it into a conspiracy based on the fact they talked about it in the media. Man up, admit you botched the facts, and move onto something else.Obviously Federal socialists are in the process of usurping this program, using socialist controlled media to prepare the public. Incremental creep.
The sheeple around here are incapable of thinking on the level necessary to see the insipid designs of evil. It falls therefore to me to sound the alarm.
Of course. This is the way society has taken care of it for thousands of years. Through private efforts and the church.
To facilitate and support these efforts local and even state governments participate. This is the proper form of private/public efforts.
Evil central government however, seeks to expand its power by seizing control supposedly in the name of charity and goodness but in fact only as a method to further enchain the people and extinguish the failing embers of liberty from the land.
Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:
Is it just me or does it seem really odd to end a sentence with a colon?
Also, why does the King James Version get associated with so many fundamentalist groups, Jack Chick included?
When you have installed your Christian Conservative Republic under Supreme Leader Perry, I suppose.At present, Washington still needs the votes. This will change in the end.
It's hardly obsolete if it's still in regular use across the United States and elsewhere in the world.
Sometimes I suspect Mr. Cooper really is the only sane man in a world gone mad. I mean, he's on the unconventional side of the sanity fence for sure.
Chick believes that God was somehow involved in the translation of the KJV and that more modern translations are demonic corruptions of God's Holy Word™. Most don't go that far, but plenty like to cling to whatever seems traditional. I personally tend to quote and read it because I like the literary quality, but I have no problem with admitting that in a few places it falls short from a contemporary scholarly perspective. I'd still probably rank in higher than the NIV all things considered though.Also, why does the King James Version get associated with so many fundamentalist groups, Jack Chick included?
It falls to government to save them.
.
So starvation = good, and feeding the poor = evil. Private charity means innocent deaths.
Except he got the model wrong.He didn't say that at all - he contested a particular model of providing charity, and proposed an alternative model of his own. He warned of the dangers of the current model, which is why he thinks another model is necessary.
But meals on wheels is the exact kind of charity he claims to want yet here he is complaining about itHe didn't say that at all - he contested a particular model of providing charity, and proposed an alternative model of his own. He warned of the dangers of the current model, which is why he thinks another model is necessary.