No, it's arabic. Egyptian arabic to be precise.
Thats a slap in the face to the Egyptian rulers for way back when.
Read back a few pages several people say they have heard arabic speakers confirm that indeed he speaks Egyptian arabic, one says he is familiar enough with Egyptian arabic to notice it when he hears it spoken. So that's it.
I have a hard time imagine how they would care, considering the state they're in. And it's a dead language, and has been for something like 2000 years, meaning people don't speak it and (more importantly) don't know how it was spoken (even though they might be able to read it to some degree)
But that really says "Your once strong and vibrant county is now being represented by a language of your past opressors ". THATS what I mean by slap to the face. .
Does it make you feel better to know that Ramses II had been dead for almost 2000 years when the Arabs came? By that account, should we ask Napoleon to speak gaulish instead of french (= latin and frankish)
Thats a terrible anolgy. That dosent even remotly work. Napoleon's land wasnt conqured and forced to speak another language. You have it backwards. Ramesses, in the game is speaking the language that was spread throughout the country to unify the under the Arad control. So that Napoleon anolgy is totally not fitting. They should have at least tried to recreate the old Egyptian language (which there are people that know it!).
Actually, as I stated in an earlier post, it is almost impossible to recreate true ancient Egyptian, only because the Egyptians didn't put in a lot of vowels in their word.
Jacsó Benjámin;9512808 said:Yeah, I'm fairly sure it's Arabic (just compare it to Arabia's clip).
Anyways, this is because ancient Egyptian is such a dead language that it troubles experts even to understand what they wrote, not let alone speak it. Chances are, no-one in the last 2000, 3000 years spoke it.
Rameses certainly spoke it though. It's pretty disappointing that they chose to go with Arabic, which makes absolutely no sense, especially when they went to such effort to try to be accurate with Montezuma. It's kind of cheating to just make him speak a totally different language, counting on the fact that we won't notice.
I'd much rather have him speaking inaccurately-pronounced Ancient Egytian (since literally no one would notice that being off) or Coptic.
I mean, it isn't like its easier to find people speak the Aztec language than people who spoke the language of Rameses.
I mean, they're acting like it hasn't been spoken for 2000 years.
It's not about the feasibility of getting it right, it's about making the attempt at all. Having him speak Arabic is little better than having him speak English -- how would you feel about that?
I mean, it isn't like its easier to find people speak the Aztec language than people who spoke the language of Rameses.
I mean, they're acting like it hasn't been spoken for 2000 years.
That language is extinct, with coptic being the closest (only?) living relative. Though they did not use that for Civ IV. As I expect coptic speakers to be rather rare what I would need would be someone who speaks, understands or is familiar enough with arabic to tell me whether or not Ramesses II (noticed that I misspelled it) speaks arabic in the clip on the official site.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuatl
On a side note I think I hear the word "ilah" in there, which is Arabic for "god" (reminder Allah = al-ilah), though such words as the word for "god" usually are quite similar in closely related or geographically close languages (compare with hebrew "el" or "elohim" and aramaic "alaha")
It hasn't been spoken for something like 2000 years. And with nahuatl you at least have about one and a half million people who speak the modern version of the language, and this modern version is only some 500 years removed from the original compared to how far removed coptic would be (and that there are like only 300 speakers of coptic worldwide) from what Ramesses II spoke (Late Egyptian, which ceased to be spoken sometime in the 7th century BC, to be supplanted by Demotic Egyptian, and then coptic came sometime in the 1st century AD)