agentxorange
Warlord
Or Leonard Nimoy, if we're staying true to Civ 4.
Current v1.13 Development Discussion
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
- Status
Imperator Knoedel
Simperator Knoedel
You also can't research anymore, instead you get technologies at historically appropriate times.
ales_
Heir
You also can't play anymore. You can only watch a replay.
agentxorange
Warlord
A replay of cutscenes, which happens to be more cutscenes. Sounds wonderful!
Stuart98
Chieftain
Should these posts be moved to the dumb ideas thread?
agentxorange
Warlord
No, these are legitimate development ideas, apparently.
cudfather
Prince
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2009
- Messages
- 334
Sure, let's reward historical downfalls instead.
I just tried a Greek game on regent, and Babylon built the oracle in Shushan on turn 72. I'm on a rather recent SVN (Polynesia is playable). I'll have to reload and I may have just been unlucky but maybe you could reduce Babylon's wonder production rate, they also have the sphinx in Babilu.
agentxorange
Warlord
I would just play the latest SVN if I were you, might fix some of your problems. Babylonia doesn't get as ridiculous in most games I've played, thanks to a couple changes with them and a buffed Persia.
Vit20141012
Chieftain
Whether it is possible to make that units could move through the jungle and marsh if there is a road? If it is possible, how? Thanks.
JustAnotherNerd
Warlord
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2014
- Messages
- 144
Dat commit for 15.12! wow ;d
Cannot wait to try it.
Cannot wait to try it.
Handful of bugs noticed in the past two games I've played as America 1700 AD scenario:
1. For some reason, in both games, I check up on Japan in the early 20th century to find it hasn't gained a single tech from what it started with. In fact, in one game I got enough espionage to see what it was researching and it just wasn't researching anything. Both games, once I gifted a tech to Japan it started researching things. Unfortunately I forgot to make a save pre-gift, but I do have a save file with a technologically illiterate 20th century Japan that has finally started researching things, if you want it and it might help you.
2. In one of my city's tooltip bar for training a spy, it says a new spy should gain +2 EXP from intelligence agency, +2 EXP from Standing Army and +4 EXP from the great generals I've nested in there. However, whenever I train a spy I've noticed it only gets the bonus EXP from the intelligence agency. It would make sense to me that spies shouldn't get bonuses from GG's or Standing Army, but if that's the case you should take it out of the tooltip to make it less ambiguous.
3. Canada's Soviet vassal name is "Soviet England." I find that kind of confusing.
4. Given the British city placement in the 1700 AD scenario, there is an oil off the eastern coast of the isles that neither Edinburgh nor London can extend to. I suggest moving the oil in one tile so you don't have to build a third city in the middle of Great Britain to get it.
1. For some reason, in both games, I check up on Japan in the early 20th century to find it hasn't gained a single tech from what it started with. In fact, in one game I got enough espionage to see what it was researching and it just wasn't researching anything. Both games, once I gifted a tech to Japan it started researching things. Unfortunately I forgot to make a save pre-gift, but I do have a save file with a technologically illiterate 20th century Japan that has finally started researching things, if you want it and it might help you.
2. In one of my city's tooltip bar for training a spy, it says a new spy should gain +2 EXP from intelligence agency, +2 EXP from Standing Army and +4 EXP from the great generals I've nested in there. However, whenever I train a spy I've noticed it only gets the bonus EXP from the intelligence agency. It would make sense to me that spies shouldn't get bonuses from GG's or Standing Army, but if that's the case you should take it out of the tooltip to make it less ambiguous.
3. Canada's Soviet vassal name is "Soviet England." I find that kind of confusing.
4. Given the British city placement in the 1700 AD scenario, there is an oil off the eastern coast of the isles that neither Edinburgh nor London can extend to. I suggest moving the oil in one tile so you don't have to build a third city in the middle of Great Britain to get it.
It is meant for Norway.
That is indeed weird, and would explain Japan's backwardsness in most games. I'll look into it.
Yes, it's a tooltip problem, apparently I didn't adapt all aspects of BUG to the new rules.
Noted.
Late game is never balanced since original RFC. It's always hard to tech AI, and players always have many ways to maximize pros. We never had to worry about losing a city in 'normal' war -- other than scripted conquerors and initial flips. In most cases we only have to keep basic defense against AI. I don't think we can solve this problem via simple modify.
Keep posting these messages and Leoreth will drop player's unit production modifier to half if not 1/3.
Keep posting these messages and Leoreth will drop player's unit production modifier to half if not 1/3.
Nerfing player is always a bad option unless reasonable. Actually I enjoyed being OP. But, in original RFC, the city number penalty forced me not to expand too much, and encouraged me to keep relations with AI. There were times I did get several teches via the Internet, now I never need it anymore, I can solely research all by myself after I stole last tech (the new great spy system is really very powerful). Maybe I should try a non-conquest European game and see how would it goes, but I just can't resist...
Imperator Knoedel
Simperator Knoedel
So what's this new statesman I keep hearing about?
- Status
