If you're actually taking your tourism seriously, you should have at least a couple/few hundred tourism per turn.
Yes it's multiplicative - four times theming bonus.
Does the UA effect double the value of the Aesthetics finisher?
I've never played France - I'm waiting for them to come up on the DCL
To me the Musketeers seem the most lacklustre part of the French Civ. They could at least give them the foreign lands bonus so the civ gets a bit of a domination edge to it.
Does the UA effect double the value of the Aesthetics finisher?
I've never played France - I'm waiting for them to come up on the DCL
To me the Musketeers seem the most lacklustre part of the French Civ. They could at least give them the foreign lands bonus so the civ gets a bit of a domination edge to it.
So if your capital has a themed Oxford University, Museum and Hermitage that equates to an extra 14 tourism.
Lets say you build the Sistine Chapel, the Louvre and the Sydney Opera House (all doable on Diety)
that is an extra 16 tourism so combined with the National Wonders you should be able to get a minimum of 30 extra tourism per turn.
I guess Hotels, Airports, National Visitors Centre don't add to this as the wiki says they just increase tourism output of Great Works and not the theming bonus.
However that still leaves Internet and other Ideology bonuses. So if you have Internet and Freedoms Broadcast Towers with a +33% bonus your Themed tourism becomes an extra 80 per turn?
And that's not counting modifiers such as Open Borders, Diplomats and Trade Routes. So essentially with those 3 we have a 120% bonus on that so we have an extra 176 tourism per turn when we reach Internet and assuming full Aesthetics. Also assuming my numbers are right
176 extra tourism per turn is certainly significant towards achieving a culture victory.
In my experience, the Sistine Chapel and the Louvre are pretty reliable builds on Deity because the AI doesn't really like Acoustics and Archaeology. SOH is almost always obtainable unless you really delay it.I don't know how you conclude that nabbing all those wonders is doable on Deity. Maybe you guys are better than me.
So if your capital has a themed Oxford University, Museum and Hermitage that equates to an extra 14 tourism.
Lets say you build the Sistine Chapel, the Louvre and the Sydney Opera House (all doable on Diety)
You're forgetting +1 movement for mounted, which is a big deal considering what it does to keshiks.
Which is exactly nothing. Keshiks in the game are archer units, not mounted units.
You're forgetting +1 movement for mounted, which is a big deal considering what it does to keshiks.
Or I may be wrong because Keshiks have 5 movement regardless and not because of the UA?
Not counting Venice, worst UA is probably Iroqouis. It might be somewhat decent if it actually did what it says it does (ie: forests function as roads), but it doesn't really do that - it just makes forests connect cities without roads, which is far less good and basically requires you to build roads anyway. (Roads are for more than just city connections, troop movement is vital - all the more so if you're surrounded by forests!)
I will argue for Iroquois' case. Yeah, the movement is a bit buggy, but all you need to do is put roads on places where forests end. It's actually a decent UA with regards to workers. With most civs, workers will have a hard time moving around forested areas. Iroquois workers get to move to their designated areas faster and can work on the same turn. The fact that you don't always need to build roads except on areas where you really need them is also a big plus, as it means even less work for your workers. The end result, you get to focus on improving your territory without losing a lot of gold or time.