Communisto
Condottiere
What part of 'arrest and charge' did you not grasp?
Right, so then why did you say "by all means treat them like men"?
Meh, I could've misinterpreted.
What part of 'arrest and charge' did you not grasp?
The federal government also did everything within and outside of it's powers to break the Black Panthers considering them the single greatest internal security threath in the US.
I personally wouldn't mind if the Tea Party was treated the same way. But the Tea Party are largely white, right-wing extremists not black Marxists like the Black Panthers were. So no suprise there.
Are you really comparing the Tea Party to the Black Panthers? Have you been getting excessive doses of Olbermann and Maddow?
They both had members who are so far off the deep-end... This with Tea partiers and some Black Panther incidentsAre you really comparing the Tea Party to the Black Panthers? Have you been getting excessive doses of Olbermann and Maddow?
Nice caveat, but not all women act like girls. If they insist on acting like men, then by all means treat them like men.
And thats not an endorsement of bootstomping someone, just on how to treat women that want to be treated like men.
No. Not at all. Just because they want to be treated like men, doesn't mean a man should hit them. Ever. Even when being attacked by a woman (even one who "insists on acting like men!), a man should only act to restrain, and go at all no further.
I gotta tell ya, I am pretty shocked to see that stuff in the non-racist north. Shocked. Because, you know, that only happens in the south according to northerners who have never stepped foot in the south and know nothing about it.
Just because that guy didn't agree with the Rand Paul supporters doesn't mean he should have his head stepped on. Shame on those hooligans, I hope they get picked up for assault.
I gotta tell ya, I am pretty shocked to see that stuff in the non-racist north. Shocked. Because, you know, that only happens in the south according to northerners who have never stepped foot in the south and know nothing about it.
Eh, "chivalry" is just misogynistic condescension tied up in a bow. Bugger it.No. Not at all. Just because they want to be treated like men, doesn't mean a man should hit them. Ever. Even when being attacked by a woman (even one who "insists on acting like men!), a man should only act to restrain, and go at all no further.
Eh, "chivalry" is just misogynistic condescension tied up in a bow. Bugger it.
Eh, "chivalry" is just misogynistic condescension tied up in a bow. Bugger it.
Spoofs don't work when they are exactly and entirely accurate.Seconded. It serves only to degrade womyn and enforce the antiquated and traditional notion of the "weak" womyn who need the protection of a man thus serving as a tool of the patriarchy to inflict their domination.
I didn't say that you were misogynistic, merely that chivalry is a misogynistic institution. I think that most men subscribe to it because they really do want to try and express respect for women as people, but don't have the social tool-set to do so, because, let's face, our cultural history doesn't exactly lend it to that sort of thing. It takes something of a concerted effort to wrench yourself away from it, and, even then, our socialisation is often so limited in its perspective that you find yourself falling back on tradition, especially when there's a concern that a lack of its presence may be take as wilfully disrespectful by similarly socialised people.Oh, well. Then I'm a misogynist. Bugger it.
Decent people of, any gender, shouldn't hit anyone, of any gender. Implicitly extending such a license to women risks trivialising female-on-male and female-on-female violence.Well that's why I added "Real men shouldn't hit anyone"...
Well, that goes without saying.EDIT: Without a bloody good reason.