Straight into Piety as Byzantium?

Replaying 2 games 7-8 times each may give you very similar results each time in terms of what the AI does. Each has a certain flavor for religion, and restarting doesn't change who's on the map. I'd opt to play 14 or so new games instead.

I also usually get the second or third Pantheon while playing Theo. But I'm usually still the second religion on Immortal, and even being third or fourth 2 buildings are often still available on founding. Good thing that the bonus gives you the extra belief upfront. Getting 3 buildings with Dora is a pretty crazy scenario, I'll admit. But the real question is whether opening Piety is the best route to a cultural VC as Byzantium, and I think it's a definite yes answer there, even with only 2 buildings. Absolute sickest is to get a Wine/Incense start w/ Monasteries and Pagodas.

On picking another Reformation than Sacred Sites as Byzantium, it's obviously bad to do this when going for a Cultural VC. The question is then, is Piety best for Byzantium for other VC's? You could make a good argument for it, but then you run into the problem raised over and over that Religion can't win you the game directly. There's no "Religion" victory. And so sure, if you're pointed at a Science win, then Jesuit Education is basically the only reason you ever go into Piety, which means that you're screwed if you're beaten to it. What mitigates against that though is that you're usually only competing against one AI who both opened Piety and is getting more culture than you are.

Another thing on that, I think it's a mistake to save up Faith for a second Prophet to enhance, rather than building a Pagoda. Pagodas give you culture, which shoots you down the tree faster so that you can get the Reformation you want. Then you complete the tree faster and get your second Prophet that way. That could be why multiple AI's are beating you to Reformation. You have to take advantage of any and all Culture that your Religion gives you in order to make good pace in the Piety track.

Also, in case you're doing this, don't play on maps larger than Standard if you want your pick of beliefs. Just FYI.
 
you forgot about 'glory of god' - the ability to buy any type of GP. this is my favorite belief for Byzantine science victory, mainly so you don't have to finish rationalism to buy scientists. Culture is scarce if you go piety, this way you don't have to worry about it nearly as much.

use that culture to get deeper into order instead, getting that tenet for free GS/GE and ability to rush spaceship with GEs. Use free GE for hubble, faith buy whatever combo of scientists/engineers will finish faster. it's pretty flexible.
 
Another thing on that, I think it's a mistake to save up Faith for a second Prophet to enhance, rather than building a Pagoda. Pagodas give you culture, which shoots you down the tree faster so that you can get the Reformation you want. Then you complete the tree faster and get your second Prophet that way. That could be why multiple AI's are beating you to Reformation. You have to take advantage of any and all Culture that your Religion gives you in order to make good pace in the Piety track.
I also came up to that conclusion -- the hard way. XD However, it's also a tradeoff: you most certainly will get another GP by saving faith before finishing Piety with Pagodas/Cathedrals, and if you delay the second GP, then you might miss out on Enhancer Beliefs. No?


Also, in case you're doing this, don't play on maps larger than Standard if you want your pick of beliefs. Just FYI.
Oooh. I play only on huge. :rolleyes:
 
My impression of a Piety opener is that it is really, really bad. Piety is hosed by the fact that religion is extremely unreliable, because getting a religion is more a matter of rolling a lucky map than anything else, much more so than other elements of the game are. When you do roll a good map for faith, it's IMO better to still skip Piety.

I think Firaxis intended Byzantium to open with Piety, but it's just not worth it IMO. On the rare occasion I play Byzantium on harder difficulties I just reroll the map until it supports a Faith strategy using pantheons. That's "cheating" I guess, but I consider the faith/religion element of the game very unbalanced.
 
My impression of a Piety opener is that it is really, really bad. Piety is hosed by the fact that religion is extremely unreliable, because getting a religion is more a matter of rolling a lucky map than anything else, much more so than other elements of the game are. When you do roll a good map for faith, it's IMO better to still skip Piety.

I think Firaxis intended Byzantium to open with Piety, but it's just not worth it IMO. On the rare occasion I play Byzantium on harder difficulties I just reroll the map until it supports a Faith strategy using pantheons. That's "cheating" I guess, but I consider the faith/religion element of the game very unbalanced.

Piety opener is not weak but risky, maybe better to Think about it in the same way as Spain UA.
Maybe they could make shrines and temple a bit stronger then they are now but maybe their is a reason to keep them as they are now.
Piety make shrines more then twice as good, however main point with piety is that if it gets a religion it can be rediculus strong, reformation is probably the strongest pick of all polices you can chose from all trees.
 
For Byzantium I'd rather go tradition until the enhanced wonder production policy, one in honor for the dromon and then finish off tradition. Using the enhanced wonder building get Stonehenge to get a religion. If you can nab one of the faith wonders in Theology as well.

With your bonus religion belief you can mimic the benefits of a reformation belief and save six policy choices for something better. The only great reformation beliefs are the buy science buildings, the buy any type of great people and the tourism for faith buildings. Past those three they are pretty lackluster and chances are someone will beat you to at least two of the three good choices.

A normal religion gets four beliefs, with six policy picks you get an extra belief. Byz gets the extra belief to start. Think of them as getting a better religion for less investment instead of trying to get the super duper best of all time religion.
 
The way I usually try to play the game, so far on king, is just go wide. What I want from social policies and ideologies are happiness buffs.

Because I want to secure good number of strategic resources (also lux if possible).

Because, I DONT want to spend an arm and a leg, on happiness buildings gold maintenance.

Because, people (pops) are science, and you want to grow cities, work specialists and good tiles. It's good to grow your cities.
 
The only civs in which piety is doable are Poland and Aztecs IMO...
Aztecs double sun god along with culture from barbs is pretty good... even if your pantheon generates no faith, finishing the tree gives you free prophet anyway. Via the religious tolerant exploit, they can get +2 food from bananas and citruses, which are plentiful usually given their bias.
Problem is happiness though.

Poland is Poland :lol: tradition + piety is awesome on some starts.
 
The best ones really for piety is the ones that allready can get alot of faith from UB or UA, civs like Maya, Celts and Ethiopia have alot to gain from piety,
 
Maya, Egypt, Songhai, Arab and Byzantium are the 5 obvious candidate for piety opening.

Why not celts, by that standard?
 
Maya Egypt and Songhai all have religious UBs, so taking stuff to power them up is very worthwhile. The Arabs and Byzantium have religion enhancing UAs so taking piety gives you a stronger chance of getting a religion and getting the benefit of the UA.

Celts and Ethiopia can generate faith without ever building a shrine or temple so opening piety isn't as big a priority for either of them.
 
Who the heck besides the AI would go straight through piety just for the sake of going through piety? Definitely should open up another policy tree where the hammers and happy faces are, and get piety policies when they are useful.

Although - with an early enough religion, Mandate of Heaven might be useful earlier than expected, and Religious Tolerance is exploity when the dominant religion is a pantheon.

Last game with Spain, I was lucky enough to find a holy mountain early, and picked One With Nature for pantheon. Settled next to Sri Pada with third city (second city founded by Grand Mesa), and the two natural wonders were giving 24 fpt by themselves.
 
Who the heck besides the AI would go straight through piety just for the sake of going through piety?

I:p

Peity can indirectly allow you to get Everything you ask for but I said Before its risky.

Every great reward comes with a great risk:eek:
 
Maya, Egypt, Songhai, Arab and Byzantium are the 5 obvious candidate for piety opening.

Piety's main selling point is speeding up that first shrine early on and then doubling its faith output into the pantheon of your choice. Founding a religion has more to do with obtaining a faith-generating pantheon (or completion of the Hagia Sophia wonder) than going piety itself (although Oracle'd finisher can get you the free prophet, it's hard to get culture to finish the tree fast enough for my liking).

Egypt and Arab... only for their start bias which sets them up for the most powerful pantheon in the game: desert folklore. Egypt's UB is rather irrelevant due to its position in the tech tree. In that case I would just open tradition, then piety, and get the double faith from shrines (and keep my fingers crossed that a religion won't be enhanced while there are enough pantheons before I get mine) It's a rather drastic approach where your start is just CRYING for desert folklore and you cannot live without it.

Maya: I would NOT open piety with Maya. Other people double their faith from shrines early on... but this guy already gets the pyramid which already has 2 faith, chances are he'll still get his desired pantheon going tradition. Besides, his UA means that he might have his prophet out at turn 60+ anyway, if he wants.
For similar reasons Celts and Ethiopia should forget about piety.

Byzantium, I feel, sucks at the moment :lol: double pantheon is nice but depends on your terrain. If your terrain lacks a faith-pantheon, then the civ is worthless, or, still, not worthless, but it's not worth it to go piety because I feel that by the time you finish piety tree, you might as well have built Hagia Sophia. (and a lot of the time all religions will have been taken before either happens anyway)

Songhai: same as Egypt. Temples are pretty high in tech and you can build them without founding a religion anyway, and by that time, usually it's already determined which civs get to found their religions. (at least talking about deity)
 
My latest game started me next to Mt. Sinai and Uluru... who needs silly faith pantheons with that?
A big thank you to the Arabs for spreading their religion and picking monasteries/pagodas for me. A lot of my cities were able to build monastery/pagoda/mosques to supplement my faith generation.

I'm thinking Liberty/Piety has some viability too, if the capital's terrain isn't particularly attractive. More cities and more shrines/temples (helped further by the Republic policy), and ultimately more religious buildings to keep happy faces up. Getting a city with good faith-building terrain

Of course I was playing Sweden, and not Byzantium.

Speaking of Byzantium (or any civ), is Liberty/Piety any good? I'd think more cities and being able to shrine/temple them quicker thanks to republic would be helpful if the capital lacks any solid terrain.
 
Liberty/piety is viable with Poland, and somewhat doable with Songhai (You'll probably be opening piety around the time you research Philosoophy and unlock the MPMs). Anyone else, you have to have a strong pantheon so you can get an early religion with some faith buildings to get the culture you'll need.
 
If you can get a + culture pantheon from a ruin! going straight into Piety can be useful for anyone.
 
Top Bottom