Adam7Eight
Emperor
I'm fine with that. That will give me the rest of this year to get around to finishing the 2nd one.
Rome 2 was looking iffy well before release though, this not so much.While I have vowed to not pre-order again after getting burned by Rome II this game looks pretty promising.
How big is the map? Bigger than skyrim?
I hate that. Dont get the reasoning behind it either. Why to ruin a perfectly free huge world with horrendous separated zones? it is because technical reasons, because playability reasons, to drive the player through the storyline...?The map is actually a large number of very large zones that you can travel between, sort of like Dragon's Age but much much much bigger, so it's not quite as true open world. From the previews & reviews it seems like more or less all of the areas are fleshed out and meaningful and large so you don't feel restricted.
I hate that. Dont get the reasoning behind it either. Why to ruin a perfectly free huge world with horrendous separated zones? it is because technical reasons, because playability reasons, to drive the player through the storyline...?
True. When you are centered in really playing for defeating the game you use fast travel and it does not matter, but i find the idea of having a continuous virtual world right there where you can walk for hours and reach any distant point after a long travel without any "artificial" restriction somewhat relaxing, or start walking for not particular reason and get absolutely lost.Does it really make that much of a difference if the zones are large enough ? If I play Skyrim I don't walk from Whiterun to Solitude after I can use fast travel. They might as well be separate zones, and from a technical viewpoint the gatet cities in Skyrim are.
I already got my copy in the mail
Four DVDs... we really need to move onto Blu-RAY for PC.
It's 2015 and you are still getting games via snail mail!?