Do multimegapixel charge-coupled devices counts as painters in the hyperrealistic style?
But if you have any photograph you really like, i guess you can post it. Just keep in mind the thread is primarily for paintings
Not pixels, is a good start.Define "paint" then.
It typically featured a cottage or a house of such insistent coziness as to seem actually sinister, suggestive of a trap designed to attract Hansel and Gretel. Every window was lit, to lurid effect, as if the interior of the structure might be on fire.
Not pixels, is a good start.
I really don't think I need to define what paint is... as you can go into stores and see it pretty easily displayed...
Define "paint" then.
Ink, dye, oils, pastels, acrylics, watercolors, fresco, tempera, goache, enamel, or wax as applied by hand or handheld tools to create an image.
The second part is solid, but what characteristic/s unify the substances you listed?
I prefer the older realistic paintings.
Seems too arbitrary.
What does "realistic" mean? You mean illusionism? Surely you understand that this is only one approach toward representation, and that it is no more "real" than, for example, a Picasso painting.
I am not familiar with the art world lingo, so I checked out illusionism on wikipedia and yes, that's what I'm referring to. I like it when I have to do a double-take to figure out whether the picture I am seeing is a photo or a painting.
I don't care for too much of the modern abstract stuff.