Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > OUR ARCHIVES > List of Archived Forums > Civilization III Archives > Civ3 - Game of Democracy VI > Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Citizens

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 09, 2005, 12:30 PM   #1
MOTH
Emperor
 
MOTH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: mostly lurking
Posts: 1,676
Domestic T1 D5: Happiness Strategies

It looks like this is my area to lead discussions. Sorry for the oversight until now.

The strategic discussions of Happiness could impact decissions affecting the Director of Commerce, the Commander of the Armed Forces, and the Governors.

There are 6 ways to address happiness in our cities and prevent them from rioting:
Luxury Resources, Luxury Spending (slider), Use of Specialists (Clowns, Scientists, Taxmen, etc.), Happiness Buildings (temple, markets, etc), and Military Police, and last (but not least) keeping the population small by building workers and settlers.

We currently have Wine to keep the people drunk and happy, but this only goes so far.

So, as for happiness strategy for the next 20-50 turns I see only one practical method of control:
Luxury Spending via the slider supplemented by occasional Military Police. In extreme cases where a corrupt city cannot produce enough luxury to keep its people happy it should switch to a specialist and produce workers to reduce its population.

This seems like such a no-brainer that it will not be polled unless there are dissenting opinions posted.

As for very long term happiness plans (ie: beyond 50 turns), I propose no changes in the Strategy. This is of course open to discussion.

An additional point on my position: Temples should never be built for the purpose of provide happiness. The only reason they should be built is to provide for local culture.
MOTH is offline  
Old Mar 09, 2005, 12:39 PM   #2
DaveShack
Inventor

 
DaveShack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA (it's a dry heat)
Posts: 12,217
I agree that for the short term there is little to discuss, however you might be surprised later in the game. We occasionally have a citizen so anti-entertainer that 10% luxury spending will be requested when only 1 of 10 cities has a problem.

Thanks for taking care of this.
__________________
Democracy Game Revival DemoGame Social Group
MTDG II - Mad Scientists

Listening: "A king, in order to be a true leader, must listen with his ears, eyes, and heart, giving his people his undivided attention."
DaveShack is offline  
Old Mar 09, 2005, 02:10 PM   #3
greekguy
Missed the Boat
 
greekguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 4,385
i agree. this early in the game we just need the luxury slider on 10% and some MP. that should keep things quiet.
__________________
It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt- Mark Twain
ll Economic Left/Right: 1.75 l Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.95
I would rather be right than be President- Henry Clay If you will it, it is no dream- Theodor Herzl
We Americans have no commission from God to police the world- Benjamin Harrison
We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be- Kurt Vonnegut


greekguy is offline  
Old Mar 10, 2005, 12:24 AM   #4
mad-bax
Deity
 
mad-bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,844
Yes but.... We will have cities at different sizes. We therefore need to decide whether we hike the slider long term for a few size 7 plus cities, or use 2 MPs in these cities to keep the slider down. Alternatively we can shave workers and settlers off big cities to keep their population down. It affects build queues and military planning, not to mention commerce and research. It shouldn't be dismissed too easily.
mad-bax is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2005, 12:49 PM   #5
MOTH
Emperor
 
MOTH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: mostly lurking
Posts: 1,676
Very little discussion here either (as expected).

The Slider will be used to adjust for happiness during the next 30-50 turns at least.
MOTH is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > OUR ARCHIVES > List of Archived Forums > Civilization III Archives > Civ3 - Game of Democracy VI > Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Citizens > Domestic T1 D5: Happiness Strategies

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domestic T3 D5- Should we start the madness? greekguy Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Citizens 3 May 23, 2005 05:59 PM
Domestic T1 P4: Infrastructure Strategies MOTH Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Polls 0 Mar 22, 2005 01:16 PM
Domestic T1 D3: Capital Development Strategies MOTH Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Citizens 9 Mar 21, 2005 11:02 AM
Domestic T1 D2: Initial Infrastructure Strategies MOTH Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Citizens 11 Mar 16, 2005 04:35 PM
Domestic T1 Poll1: Settlement Density MOTH Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Polls 16 Mar 16, 2005 12:43 AM


Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR