UGO
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION TAVERN > Civ - Ideas & Suggestions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 10, 2005, 06:35 AM   #1
el turco
Chieftain
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
How can the turks doesnt exist in the game??

hi everyone
i want to say that when i looked at the nations that existed in civ 4 i realized that turks didint exist in the list. mali is in the list, inca is inthe list, spain is in the list and turks are not. in my opinion, this is absolutely ridicalous. turks formed the second long lived empire after the romans and 150 milion turks live troughout the world. what do you think about this??
el turco is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 06:46 AM   #2
Loppan Torkel
Emperor
 
Loppan Torkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,380
An expansionciv?!
Loppan Torkel is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 06:58 AM   #3
NinjaCool
Warlord
 
NinjaCool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 184
Some important civs are missing still like the Vikings but many of our missing civs will be in the expansion probably so we will see them in later
__________________
Take a longboat and 20 of your finest men, head to where the sun sets.
There you will find a village, pillage, plunder and burn all that you find!
Follow Thor, follow victory!
NinjaCool is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:18 AM   #4
SonicX
Emperor
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Republic of Flanders (Be)
Posts: 1,268
The Turks need to recognise Greek Cyprus to get in anywhere these days.
__________________
Anarchist rallies reemphasize the need for more authority
SonicX is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:26 AM   #5
Jay
Warlord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 139
Shaka better be there overwise his ***kicking on civ IV will have to be delayed
Jay is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:33 AM   #6
troytheface
Deity
 
troytheface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,849
This may be a fine time to get more creative with expansions...someone on here mentioned the idea of having a barbarian tribes expansion pack- i thought that clever-
a good way to get the Vikings, the Mongols the Celts (are the celts the same as the Gauls? or better asked- are the Gauls celtic?) the Huns the Goths ect. in the game and allow for a different way to play - ie no cities- u hafta take them or settle in enemy territory.
But as to the intial question- (which i think has been asked before) i agree- the Turks were more significant than many others included. In so far as Cyprus- that little island has been divided for quite some time now...its like ireland- the stronger country holds onto a chunk of it because ...it's stronger i suppose...
troytheface is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:37 AM   #7
Karaman
Chieftain
 
Karaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bulgaria!
Posts: 80
Why the Kurds are not in the CIV4 anyway?! :P

Come on, stop these stupid topics! If you want your civ in the game, send Firaxis a letter with an unbiased story of your nation and hope they include it in expansion! Ask them why they dont included it, etc, etc, make a good letter!

If you want to make this topic worth reading, please tell us about your nation, do not spam the forum!
__________________
History is to learn from it, not to repeat it!
Karaman is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:40 AM   #8
Gr3yL3gion
Voice of Madness
 
Gr3yL3gion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: KL, Malaysia<->Singapore
Posts: 2,202
Let's face it, the Turks are a minor civ, and always will be.
__________________
When you play with fire
You will expect to get burned
Finger licking good
Gr3yL3gion is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:46 AM   #9
Jay
Warlord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gr3yL3gion
Let's face it, the Turks are a minor civ, and always will be.
you have made my day with that one. The Turks on Civ III (ottomans people!) were an incredible play for me. They assisted in my triumph of Emperor and i hope will help me along to deity in a couple of weeks.

My opinion is the Turks have never been a minor civ and never will be. quite the opposite to your opinion.

Facts about this 'Minor' civ
The Ottoman Empire (Turks) were an imperial power centered around the borders of the Mediterranean Sea that existed from 1281 (or 1299) to 1923(!). It was one of the largest empires of all times, and, at the height of its power, it included Anatolia, the Middle East, parts of North Africa, and much of south-eastern Europe(!).

May i ask who captured the city of Constantinople, the Byzantine Capital....Turks. Now i berlieve Modern Istanbul.

Last edited by Jay; Sep 10, 2005 at 07:52 AM.
Jay is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 07:53 AM   #10
Jay
Warlord
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 139
surly the above is enough to get into the game, but i believe 100% it will be in the Civ Series as it was Civ III

Last edited by Jay; Sep 10, 2005 at 08:08 AM.
Jay is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 09:58 AM   #11
Willowmound
Wordsmith
 
Willowmound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 800 AD
Posts: 1,990
Quote:
(are the celts the same as the Gauls? or better asked- are the Gauls celtic?)
Yes, Gauls are what the Romans called the Celts of what is now France. The Celts at their height spanned modern-day France, Spain, Switzerland, Austria, almost to the Black Sea. And of course the British Isles. The size of their "empire" almost rivals the later Roman one, though decentralised as they were you could hardly call it an empire. Anyone upset the Celts aren't in?
Willowmound is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 10:57 AM   #12
Grey Fox
Dreadnought
 
Grey Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 8,025
The ottomans didnt get into Civ3 until an expansion, the same will probably be true for Civ4.
__________________
GreyFox.ME - a blog about Gaming and Me | ~SolidDread@DeviantArt | FfH2ComicStrips | My Mods
Read Welcome To China! - Play Fall from Heaven 2 a Dark Fantasy Civ4 mod -> Download here - PDF Manual

Rise from Erebus - R i f E - Member of the R i f E team. - Chat about FfH stuff @ #erebus
Grey Fox is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 11:44 AM   #13
Greek Stud
Prince
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Westlake Village, CA
Posts: 425
Well there's Mongolia, and considering that the Gokturks, Ghuzz and Tunarian Turks all came from Mongolian tribes you have to consider their significance. The Gokturks are the invaders that caused China to build the Great Wall of China.

I say recognize the Republic of Cyprus and we can speak of adding the Turks on October 3rd. hehe
Greek Stud is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 11:48 AM   #14
mitsho
Convinced EuroSwiss
 
mitsho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Basel, CH
Posts: 3,298
Well, that's probably the mistake of civIV. The Turks are a great 'European nation' (seige of Vienna, they are about to join the EU, major player in WWI, etc. - they're not european, but played in the same club), as well as a vital part of the islamic world (e.g. if you study at university islamic studies you have to learn Arab, Persian or Turkish - the first two civs are in the game, the turks not). Big mistake, but it's too late to change it now for civIV 'vanilla'.

m
__________________
Seid be(un)ruhigt und brecht in Panik aus.
(Don't) Be calm and go run scared.
mitsho is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 12:15 PM   #15
frekk
Scourge of St. Lawrence
 
frekk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,458
Turks (or Ottomans) should have been a shoe-in for the vanilla version, hopefully we will see them in an expansion.

IMO I'd like to see the expansions have a geographical focus, the first up could possibly be a Near East expansion to include Turks, Sumerians, Phoenician/Carthaginians, and a few others.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TroytheFace
(are the celts the same as the Gauls? or better asked- are the Gauls celtic?)
Yes, Celts are a name for a cultural phenomena extending over the whole of Europe, from Ireland to the Danube, before and during the Roman era. It would be mistaken to assume it's a racial or political denomination though, at least in that broad sense (Celtic Britons and Irish might be very interrelated, but they wouldn't be related to the Keltoi north of Greece from whence the name comes). It simply refers to a common culture shared by all the pre-Roman peoples of Europe, similar religious beliefs, art, warfare, dress, and so on.

Last edited by frekk; Sep 10, 2005 at 12:21 PM.
frekk is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 01:55 PM   #16
Ulyaoth
Emperor
 
Ulyaoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by frekk
Yes, Celts are a name for a cultural phenomena extending over the whole of Europe, from Ireland to the Danube, before and during the Roman era. It would be mistaken to assume it's a racial or political denomination though, at least in that broad sense (Celtic Britons and Irish might be very interrelated, but they wouldn't be related to the Keltoi north of Greece from whence the name comes). It simply refers to a common culture shared by all the pre-Roman peoples of Europe, similar religious beliefs, art, warfare, dress, and so on.

The Celts were a racial group, that moved into Europe at IIRC around 1200BC. Yes, as they moved in they mingled with the various indigenous people, they grew different, but at first they were basically the same. And they weren't all of Europe. They were from Switzerland, Germany(prior to German tribes emmigrating from their native lands in Scandinavia and pushing the Celts out) France, Northern Italy(Po Valley, Alps), Britain, Scotland, and Ireland, and parts of the Balkans after invasions which eventually left them in Thrace and Asia Minor.
Ulyaoth is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 03:28 PM   #17
Tunch Khan
King
 
Tunch Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Williamsburg, Brooklyn
Posts: 788
This is the only way they can sell an expansion pack. Simply put, Firaxis needs more money.
Tunch Khan is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 03:30 PM   #18
Tunch Khan
King
 
Tunch Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Williamsburg, Brooklyn
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karaman
Why the Kurds are not in the CIV4 anyway?! :P

Come on, stop these stupid topics! If you want your civ in the game, send Firaxis a letter with an unbiased story of your nation and hope they include it in expansion! Ask them why they dont included it, etc, etc, make a good letter!

If you want to make this topic worth reading, please tell us about your nation, do not spam the forum!
Does anyone here need to learn anything about the Turks that they already not know? As if you don't know who they are...
Tunch Khan is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 03:54 PM   #19
toft
Talk to the hand
 
toft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: €urope
Posts: 542
U think turkey should be in, I think Denmark should be in... and Afghans prolly think they should be in... dough! Stupid question. There will be 18 civs and I am sry to say - Turkey is simply not among the top 18...
toft is offline  
Old Sep 10, 2005, 04:35 PM   #20
Tunch Khan
King
 
Tunch Khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Williamsburg, Brooklyn
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by toft
U think turkey should be in, I think Denmark should be in... and Afghans prolly think they should be in... dough! Stupid question. There will be 18 civs and I am sry to say - Turkey is simply not among the top 18...
According to which time period you made a top 18 list? Or is this an overall world Civilization Top 18? If so, maybe you'd reconsider the list given the most influential events in world history were triggered and/or influenced by the Turks.

A- Crusaders

B- End of Middle Ages

C- Bolshevik Revolution
Tunch Khan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION TAVERN > Civ - Ideas & Suggestions > How can the turks doesnt exist in the game??

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Game doesnt starup right Microgta Civ4 - Technical Support 0 Jun 18, 2007 09:28 PM
Installed game, but it doesnt start up!!! sarnie Civ4 - Technical Support 8 Nov 30, 2005 09:35 AM
Turks are added to the game Tunch Khan Civ4 - General Discussions 7 Nov 03, 2005 10:00 PM
God doesnt exist, the Bible's wrong Lord Draegon Off-Topic 6 Jun 25, 2004 11:23 PM
My PCXs. doesnt appear in the game!!! Licinio Civ3 - General Discussions 2 Feb 01, 2004 03:36 PM



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © 2000 - 2009, Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | EB Games | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR