| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Formerly known as low
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 1,210
|
Trait-specific techs...
...is what I'm interested in. Here's what I mean-
I want to be able to 'group' every (or most) technology in the game to a specific civilization trait. For example, Archery, Horseback Riding, and Rifling would all be examples of "agressive-trait" technologies. Banking and Currency would be "financial-trait" technologies, Meditation and Priesthood would be "spiritual-trait" technologies, and so on and so on. Basically, I want civ traits to be a little more important by making technologies that can be linked to a certain trait a little bit cheaper for a civilization that has the trait. Got that? Examples: Archery costs 40 for a non-agressive civ, but only 35 for an agressive civ. Meditation costs 35 for spiritual civs, but 40 for non-spiritual civs. Is it more clear now? I want technologies to be cheaper for a specific trait... but how? I've begun poking around, but have came to the conclusion that this would involve more than editing XML files. I'm thinking about the possibility of perhaps adding a "<traitcostmodifier>" or something similar to the "CIV4TechInfos.xml" file... Code:
<TechInfo> <Type>TECH_MYSTICISM</Type> <Description>TXT_KEY_TECH_MYSTICISM</Description> <Civilopedia>TXT_KEY_TECH_MYSTICISM_PEDIA</Civilopedia> <Help /> <Strategy>TXT_KEY_TECH_MYSTICISM_STRATEGY</Strategy> <Advisor>ADVISOR_RELIGION</Advisor> <iAIWeight>0</iAIWeight> <iAITradeModifier>0</iAITradeModifier> <iCost>50</iCost> <Era>ERA_ANCIENT</Era> <FirstFreeUnitClass>NONE</FirstFreeUnitClass> <iWorkerSpeedModifier>0</iWorkerSpeedModifier> <iTradeRoutes>0</iTradeRoutes> <iHealth>0</iHealth> <iHappiness>0</iHappiness> <iFirstFreeTechs>0</iFirstFreeTechs> <iAsset>8</iAsset> <iPower>0</iPower> <bRepeat>0</bRepeat> <bTrade>1</bTrade> <bDisable>0</bDisable> <bGoodyTech>1</bGoodyTech> <bExtraWaterSeeFrom>0</bExtraWaterSeeFrom> <bMapCentering>0</bMapCentering> <bMapVisible>0</bMapVisible> <bMapTrading>0</bMapTrading> <bTechTrading>0</bTechTrading> <bGoldTrading>0</bGoldTrading> <bOpenBordersTrading>0</bOpenBordersTrading> <bDefensivePactTrading>0</bDefensivePactTrading> <bPermanentAllianceTrading>0</bPermanentAllianceTrading> <bBridgeBuilding>0</bBridgeBuilding> <bIrrigation>0</bIrrigation> <bIgnoreIrrigation>0</bIgnoreIrrigation> <bWaterWork>0</bWaterWork> <iGridX>1</iGridX> <iGridY>11</iGridY> <DomainExtraMoves /> <CommerceFlexible /> <TerrainTrades /> - <Flavors> - <Flavor> <FlavorType>FLAVOR_RELIGION</FlavorType> <iFlavor>9</iFlavor> </Flavor> - <Flavor> <FlavorType>FLAVOR_GOLD</FlavorType> <iFlavor>1</iFlavor> </Flavor> - <Flavor> <FlavorType>FLAVOR_CULTURE</FlavorType> <iFlavor>8</iFlavor> </Flavor> - <Flavor> <FlavorType>FLAVOR_GROWTH</FlavorType> <iFlavor>2</iFlavor> </Flavor> </Flavors> <OrPreReqs /> <AndPreReqs /> <Quote>TXT_KEY_TECH_MYSTICISM_QUOTE</Quote> <Sound>AS2D_TECH_MYSTICISM</Sound> <SoundMP>AS2D_TECH_MP_MYSTICISM</SoundMP> Last edited by CyberTyrant; Nov 07, 2005 at 11:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 21
|
I think this is a really cool idea. The Traits system seems kind of lackluster to me in its current state, and I think this would go a long way towards making them a more important decision. I'm not fully sure how you would go about it, however. I've been mulling over the various XML files, trying to get a good feel for them, but still wouldn't condsider myself very well versed in them. Maybe as I get more comfortable with them, I might be able to help out with this a bit.
Wish I could do more than just say "cool idea" though...)C: |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Formerly known as low
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 1,210
|
So, nobody else is interested in something like this, huh?
That's unfortunate. Because now I have to try to figure it out on my own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
King
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 886
|
heh
I'm interested, very cool idea... hope you're able to figure it out that's all I'm good for... moral support
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 2,451
|
I'm interested if someone knew how to implement it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Specific Techs for specific civs? | marioflag | Civ4 - Fall from Heaven | 6 | Jul 28, 2007 12:03 PM |
| Civs specific Techs... | laski | Civ3 - General Discussions | 3 | Nov 15, 2004 12:34 PM |
| Trait specific improvements! | meltone1 | Civ3 - General Discussions | 9 | Dec 19, 2003 03:22 PM |
| Balancing UUs With Trait Specific Units | Pembroke | Civ3 - Creation & Customization | 3 | Jan 29, 2003 01:40 AM |
| Civ Trait Specific Units | Kal-el | Civ3 - Creation & Customization | 27 | May 14, 2002 04:04 PM |