Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION III > Civ3 - Strategy & Tips

Notices

View Poll Results: Aggressive vs. Non-Aggressive Strategies
Primarily Aggressive 8 22.22%
Primarily Non-Aggressive 16 44.44%
Even Mixture of Both 12 33.33%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 18, 2002, 09:50 AM   #1
Mesopotamia
Chieftain
 
Mesopotamia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 28
On War

Does CivIII present war in a counterproductive manner? That is, do you think a civilization can advance further by a primarily aggressive or non-aggressive strategy?
Mesopotamia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 18, 2002, 10:34 AM   #2
Cerryl
Warlord
 
Cerryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 211
I am always starting wars. I only play on Standard maps and have found the only way to get enough room to setup, is to rid yourself of your neighbors.
__________________
Move not unless you see an advantage; use not your troops unless there is something to be gained; fight not unless the position is critical.
Cerryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 19, 2002, 08:10 AM   #3
Grotius
Warlord
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 299
I rarely start wars, even when I should. It's just not my play style. The AI attacks me all the time anyway. <g>

I like fighting wars once they've started, but I like to be in a position of clear superiority. I'm afraid I'm a bit too cautious about defining what's "superiority."

My most satisfying victory was a recent diplomatic victory. I fought a couple of defensive wars, but mostly I developed, traded, conducted diplomacy. It was great fun.
Grotius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2002, 05:41 PM   #4
cat98
Pharaoh
 
cat98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada (or: Egypt
Posts: 132
Smile Heh..

I usually have a healthy dose of both in my games. I concentrate on expansion, infrastructure and tech. When I run into another civ that just happens to have something I want (territory for starters)I blitz it without warning, and raze most of its citys. After that I start my new workers on roads and have my swarm of settlers move in. Rinse and repeat. After a few thousand years I control most of the world. Though it does seem kind of strange, a nice peacefull (isolationist) civ with a great culture (loads of cash) and a sizable amount of tech (not to mention a disgracefull rep) suddenly gets mad and attacks another just because its national color doesn't look pleasing to its rulers eye. Just imagine Canada taking over Turkey just to name it Chicken... No wonder all other rulers hate me.

ALL HAIL PHARAOH!!!
cat98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2002, 06:03 PM   #5
Furry Spatula
...
 
Furry Spatula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Funcouver
Posts: 1,493
this is how i play ...

1) set up and keep everyone happy

2) kick the living s**t out of everyone around me and secure my continent.

I dont like to have wars in which the enemy is still standing, it just causes problems later on in the game. ANd if its early in the game and you decide to kick some German but to get land and you dont kill them, not only do you have the most agressive(tied with zulus i think) civ next door, but they have a grudge against you.
Furry Spatula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2002, 01:43 PM   #6
minilump
Chieftain
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2

I particularly like to expand as far as I can fairly early in the game, without any military action. Once I have made sure that my home cities are well fortified with the best defensive unit of that age, I will attack in mass quantities of the best offensive unit of that age. I normally don't provoke anyone, but if they attack me and either take over or destroy a city, they will pay!
minilump is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION III > Civ3 - Strategy & Tips > On War

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ork War Trukk & War Trak (Oct 28, 2007) aaglo Civ3 - Unit Graphics 19 Feb 19, 2008 03:59 PM
External Consulate T4 D1- War...War...and more War greekguy Civ3 - Demo Game VI: Citizens 7 Jun 04, 2005 10:05 AM
Persian War, Egyptian War, then The World War compuXP Civ3 - Stories & Tales 3 Mar 28, 2005 12:33 AM
how many turns in your longest war??? do you like a long war? and other war like ?'s ThePrankMonkey Civ3 - General Discussions 27 Oct 10, 2002 04:58 PM


Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR