|
| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
 |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Damn the Torpedoes! | |||
| Yes! Keep our power strong, as a Navy is true power! |
   
|
2 | 28.57% |
| No! Navies are for WIMPS!!!! |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I really have no idea, but I feel the need to annoy you |
  
|
2 | 28.57% |
| Shut up and row boy! We aren't going to get a navy with your yappin! |
  
|
3 | 42.86% |
| Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Feb 21, 2002, 07:11 PM
|
#1 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bringing enlightenment to you
Posts: 5,586
|
The Naval Quota Act of 1070
As a citizen of the United Fanatica Empire, I know that our great Seafaring nation needs to expand its influence elsewere, whether it be Rome, Mongolia, Zululand or even other places. To do this, as an islandic nation, is to keep a large navy ready to explore, transport ground forces across the Sea, Patrol our waters and Attack opposing fleets.
I am proposing a Quota to be in place once our great economic troubles are over. It will be 2 ships for every three cities. At Least! Feel free to discuss, and if need be, change the numbers around as you please  I bet the Colonists will like this one... |
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 07:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Hidden Dragon
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 19,209
|
It's too early to build up an offensive navy now. We shld wait till we get cruisers at least IMHO.
An adequate fleet of transports will do for now. I would rather build a small powerful fleet to protect our naval lanes and more army units for ferrying across to conquer to new lands. Navy won't give us more cities. 
__________________
Join The History Enthusiasts' Lodge, The Anime & Manga Appreciation Club and The World of Warcraft Players' Guild today! |
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 07:22 PM
|
#3 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bringing enlightenment to you
Posts: 5,586
|
Aargh!
Your right... I forgot we are in the ancient age... Perhaps holding this one off until Steam Power... and then the serving MIlitary Advisor can post this again... But then again, we do need more triremes... |
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 07:26 PM
|
#4 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bringing enlightenment to you
Posts: 5,586
|
Here we go again...
How about for every 3 cities, 1 trireme at least. That sounds good, to ferry troops around... |
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 07:43 PM
|
#5 |
|
Hidden Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 19,209
|
I would rather base the no of tiremes on the naval traffic and the no of crucial naval lanes.
Maybe 1-2 more for exploration purposes.
__________________
Join The History Enthusiasts' Lodge, The Anime & Manga Appreciation Club and The World of Warcraft Players' Guild today! |
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 08:36 PM
|
#6 |
|
Hired Goon
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ringwood, NJ USA
Posts: 1,895
|
Ships are so useful for transport - especially on island maps. I have to admit that I often find myself low on ships.
I would hesitate before making too many right now, however. Probably 3 would be a decent number (probably fits to your ratio of 1:3 anyway ) The danger is that before galleons, the trireme and the caravel are both considered military and will count for unhappiness should we switch governments.Perhaps we could hold off until caravels are available and build one at that point to supplement our navy transport. Good idea to get us thinking about this! 
|
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 08:38 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Civfanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
__________________
Still playing Civ IV... |
|
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2002, 09:55 PM
|
#8 |
|
The Brick and The Rose
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 5,315
|
we need one or two more trirems but not a big navy......yet
|
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2002, 02:26 AM
|
#9 |
|
Communist Nazi
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: townsville.qld.au
Posts: 2,247
|
Some triremes, but if you're going to make an offencive navy, make sure we are going to have Leo's (Or have we already got that? I havent had an extremely good look around yet)
|
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2002, 03:23 AM
|
#10 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,247
|
Yes, a strong navy of both warships and transports is definitely needed. But as I understand it, we can only build triremens for now. We should not build triremes for naval superiority purposes. Let´s either wait until magnetism is avalible or we have secured Leo´s.
__________________
Ibland måste man göra sådant som man inte vågar, annars är man ingen människa utan bara en liten lort. - ur Bröderna Lejonhjärta |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quota on Foreign Players? | Pangur Bán | Sports Talk | 21 | Nov 27, 2007 01:11 PM |
| 1070 culture win | bostich | Civ4 - Hall of Fame Discussion | 56 | Dec 26, 2006 03:05 AM |
| What if I use over 100% of my PM quota? | Bifrost | Site Feedback | 9 | Mar 10, 2003 03:28 AM |
| How come my PM quota is at 50% | sabo | Site Feedback | 7 | Jan 22, 2003 11:20 AM |
| (unofficial) Defence Quota Poll | Ohwell | Civ2 - Game of Democracy | 7 | Mar 01, 2002 12:39 PM |
|
