Refugee Amendment Vote

fe3333au · Jun 20, 2006, 02:05 PM

In lieu of ybbor's absence and the fact that I have virtually caused all this

We have to vote on adding the bolded line to the ruleset ... go here for links

Change Rules from

Quote:

0.3.1 - Membership retention after Defeat

Description: Members of teams that were defeated in the current game are allowed to join the team that conquered them, if the team will have them. They may also join neighboring teams that they had contact with at the time of their defeat.

to

Quote:

0.3.1 - Membership retention after Defeat

Description: Upon defeat, members of the defeated team lose access to their native forum. They are allowed to join the team that conquered them, if the team will have them. They may also join neighboring teams that they had contact with at the time of their defeat.

My thoughts were to easily prevent refugees from accessing their original and now RIP team's forum until the game is over and all is made public.

Note - vote closes in 3 days

azzaman333 · Jun 20, 2006, 08:45 PM

Me vote yes.

ybbor · Jun 21, 2006, 10:02 AM

I don't see any reason why they should.

fe3333au · Jun 21, 2006, 10:29 AM

sorry I thought you were on holidays else I wouldn't have posted the poll so quickly ...

peter grimes · Jun 21, 2006, 02:15 PM

I dont' really see the point of blocking their access to their native forum. I can see giving them a choice: give up access to the native if you join a new team, but I don't see a reason to prohibit those who don't want to join a new team from seeing their native forum.

I would have preferred to see an Amendment that removes the 'no spoiler' clause, as it's unrealistic.

Meleager · Jun 21, 2006, 07:41 PM

I say yes. It is extra sercurity because mistakes do happen.

fe3333au · Jun 24, 2006, 09:25 PM

Have sent the vote in

View Poll Results: Agree to proposed Rule Amendment
Yes	6	66.67%
No	1	11.11%
Abstain	2	22.22%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Jun 20, 2006, 08:45 PM	#2
azzaman333 I Can Make You Love Me Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Melbourne, AUS Reputation:131^(9/2) Posts: 21,028 Images: 2	Me vote yes. __________________ Walking by myself with a funeral in my head. I hope you're happy what you're doing. You know how that they say you cant help but love the dead? Well that’s exactly where I’m heading. And I can make you love me...

Jun 21, 2006, 10:29 AM	#4
fe3333au Deity Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Fern Tree, Tassie Posts: 6,979	sorry I thought you were on holidays else I wouldn't have posted the poll so quickly ... __________________ PBEM - Haiti Restart (qummik) Aussie Meso (Classical Hero) Nu (bathsheba666) Fantastic Civ Stories Pax Romana (Vanadorn), Chairmen of the Border (Jeremy 3.0) and The Vanguard (BasketCase) Multi-Team Demogame II ... Team vs. Team interacting in the Same World ... Signup here

Jun 21, 2006, 02:15 PM	#5
peter grimes ... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Queens, New York Posts: 10,026	I dont' really see the point of blocking their access to their native forum. I can see giving them a choice: give up access to the native if you join a new team, but I don't see a reason to prohibit those who don't want to join a new team from seeing their native forum. I would have preferred to see an Amendment that removes the 'no spoiler' clause, as it's unrealistic. __________________ "When faced with stupidity, I dont find 'critical thinking' useful." chiteng

Jun 21, 2006, 07:41 PM	#6
Meleager Stoned as a Statue Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 2,106	I say yes. It is extra sercurity because mistakes do happen. __________________ Nugget Of Wisdom #926732: "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts."- Albert Einstein

Jun 21, 2006, 10:02 AM	#3
ybbor Will not change his avata Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Chicago Suburbs Posts: 5,773	I don't see any reason why they should.

Jun 24, 2006, 09:25 PM	#7
fe3333au Deity Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Fern Tree, Tassie Posts: 6,979	Have sent the vote in __________________ PBEM - Haiti Restart (qummik) Aussie Meso (Classical Hero) Nu (bathsheba666) Fantastic Civ Stories Pax Romana (Vanadorn), Chairmen of the Border (Jeremy 3.0) and The Vanguard (BasketCase) Multi-Team Demogame II ... Team vs. Team interacting in the Same World ... Signup here

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
UN: Team Vote On Proposed Amendment	IamJohn	Team SANCTA	6	Nov 26, 2008 09:41 PM
Team Vote - Amendment to the Ruleset	RegentMan	Civ3 - Multi-Team Demogame	6	Jun 27, 2006 06:18 AM
Rule 2.4 Amendment Vote	RegentMan	Civ3 - Multi-Team Demogame	5	Oct 23, 2005 11:41 PM
Rule 2.4 Amendment Vote	RegentMan	Team TNT	8	Oct 20, 2005 01:17 PM
Amendment to rule 2.4 vote	Whomp	Team K.I.S.S.	13	Oct 18, 2005 07:40 AM

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com \| Amazon UK \| Amazon DE \| Amazon CA \| Amazon FR