| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Smeee heeeeed
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham, central England
Posts: 1,672
|
Question about Artillery (and a possible solution...)
I have been following with great interest all the various threads about artillery/bombardment units. Some people like them; some people think they are too weak; some would rather have four pikemen defending than two pikes and two cannon; some think that units with one move point cannot attack well; and just about everybody thinks that the AI doesn't build enough of them, if any.
Well, here's my question.....can anybody out there with more experiance with civ3 than myself tell me what would happen if all the land siege units were given attack & defence strengths (and have the attack + bombarment + ZOC flags ticked), AS WELL AS keeping their current bombardment factors and ranges? For example:- Catapults = attack 4, defence 1, move 1. Cannons = attack 8, defence 2, move 1. Artillery = attack 12, defence 3, move 1. Radar Art = attack 16, defence 4, move 1 (or maybe 2?). Would the AI start building these units, treating them as ordinary attacking units? And would they still keep their defensive bombardment fire against enemy attackers? Last of all, once we have conned the AI into building them, would they be used to offensivley bombard? Even if the answer to the last item is "NO", would it at least be a partial soultion? Because at the moment only the human player seems to build and use seige units, which is a bit of a cheat, and this may also give the human player as well as the AI more of a reason to build them (BTW, the stats above are just my 'guesstimate'. They may need tweeking to avoid the good old civ2 late game 'howitzer-blitz'). So, your thoughts please. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about artillery | Steph | Civ3 - Creation & Customization | 32 | May 14, 2007 11:33 PM |
| newbie question about artillery | marioflag | Civ4 - General Discussions | 5 | Nov 23, 2005 09:56 PM |
| Unpacking Arto.FPK Solution Question | WHLNH | Civ4 - Technical Support | 1 | Oct 30, 2005 07:51 AM |
| Question about cannon's and artillery? | Riderforlife13 | Civ3 - General Discussions | 4 | Dec 20, 2001 02:07 PM |