| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In front of the screen
Posts: 492
|
At first glance, I ignored this change in the new patch:
"* The maximum food a tile with a city on it can produce has been changed to 2." Now I realized that this means that it is no longer a good idea to place cities on certain resources. Is there a way to change this back as it was before ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Gil Favor's Sidekick
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 3,361
|
There is no way to fix this modification as it is Firaxis hard coded.
I have no real conflict with this change except in starting locations. The problem with the feature in impacting the first city is that it forces you to move the initial settler or totally abandon the bonus resource. With subsequent cities, you can almost always avoid sitting directly on the resource without it being a gamebreaker issue. In the higher level game scenarios, moving the settler is almost the same as committing suicide because the game is a flat out race to produce settlers and see who can expand to settle the first 10-12 cities first. If this resource devaluation rule is going to be in place then the start position determination subroutine needs to be updated to avoid giving the player an unfair disadvantage and critical resource loss. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fine tuning the early game. Maximum REX or Maximum City Development? | Hereditary Rule | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 24 | Jan 16, 2009 03:55 PM |
| MAximum units per tile idea | coffeeholic | Civ4 - General Discussions | 9 | Nov 08, 2007 04:46 PM |
| SCREW 1.21f ... Time to give up and unload 1.21f | deltablues | Civ3 - Technical Support | 8 | Jun 04, 2002 11:16 AM |
| City tile production with 1.21f patch | Nero Would | Civ3 - General Discussions | 1 | May 05, 2002 04:05 PM |
| zoom into city mode crashes the game with 1.21f ? | papajohns | Civ3 - General Discussions | 1 | Apr 21, 2002 05:20 PM |