| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Kami of Awakened Dreamers
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 2,288
|
Well, maybe the AI knows a little bit about metagaming.
If i have moderate tech advances, and a superpower asks for the 1-2 things i have that they dont have and need to kill me, i will immediatly start sharing these with civs i know to hate the superpower and build a coalition. I would be happy to give monty or even shaka rifling and let them take a big charge as long as i felt confident A: they would immediatly use it against you so i dont have to take the risk and B: While you deal with them i can work up a tech lead of my own. Maybe the computer sees your advances as a threat to them, so they shared amongst themselves knowing that if they pumped each other, they might build themselves a later enemy, but if it gets you taken care of for a while it could be worth it. I even did ONE multiplayer game thus far - and players "cheat" in the same manner. If i am 9 techs ahead of the word, some of the other players might make a secretive alliance pre-build against me by first swaping each tech they all know, then readying their units and lastly, having one of them provoke me into an attack or attacking me, so the other 2 can jump in by suprise. In doing so, if i survive i might be reduced big and now be the last place, but it worked in their favor - for now. of course ill remember who did this once i have nukes ![]() I think the computer thinks along the same lines. Last edited by thadian; Jun 16, 2007 at 04:50 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
King
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 934
|
Quote:
If I'm one of the first to research a certain tech, I'll try to trade it to everyone, even if it's only for a small gold amount. At least it blocks who you just traded it to from benefiting. It was already said that you can't see techs an AI has until you research the prereqs. There's been a couple times that I thought I was in good shape and researched a tech that unlocks a bunch of others. It looks like the AI suddenly gets a bunch of tech, but it's only a matter of finally being able to see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 326
|
I also keep no tech trading checked. I hate watching the AI move up technologically for seemingly no good reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 293
|
Fortunatly in BotS they are making it so you cant trade a tech if you didnt research it. So it might limit how much the AI spreads Tech among themselves. etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 36
|
I seem to be in the minority that likes to keep tech trading on :s.
A faviourate strat of mine is to beeline writing then horde it as long as possible so that only I may trade techs ![]() But I only play on the mid range difficulties so meh. I'll also second the view of unlocking a prereq and suddenly realising how far youve slipped during those xzenophobic years but can usually recover from there, all it takes is one good tech and you can score like 4 from different AIs. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AI Suicide - No Improvement in BTS? And AI Ignorance in Terra Maps. | ConanKND | Civ4 - General Discussions | 8 | Jan 22, 2008 12:52 PM |
| Aggressive AI - Does it apply AI to AI? | mavajo | Civ4 - General Discussions | 7 | Dec 10, 2007 11:11 AM |
| (AI ISSUE?) AI: AI Building National Park in city with no Forests | Auren | Civ4 - Bug Reports | 8 | Sep 01, 2007 12:33 PM |
| Technical AI Discussion... suggestions for the Civ4 AI (NOT another Civ3 AI rant!) | IDSmoker | Civ3 - General Discussions | 19 | Jul 14, 2002 03:50 PM |
| Resolved: This game boils down to AI cheating vs. Human exploitaion of AI weaknesses. | mgdpublic | Civ3 - General Discussions | 14 | Nov 15, 2001 04:38 PM |