| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Worst Civ | |||
| Rome |
|
1 | 3.70% |
| Greece |
|
0 | 0% |
| Germany |
|
0 | 0% |
| China |
|
0 | 0% |
| Japan |
|
0 | 0% |
| India |
|
1 | 3.70% |
| Aztecs |
|
1 | 3.70% |
| Iroquois |
|
2 | 7.41% |
| Egypt |
|
0 | 0% |
| Babylon |
|
1 | 3.70% |
| Russia |
|
0 | 0% |
| America |
|
5 | 18.52% |
| France |
|
3 | 11.11% |
| Persia |
|
0 | 0% |
| Zuluz |
|
4 | 14.81% |
| Britain |
|
9 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 38
|
I say America.
Expansionist really sucks and Industrious is not much better. Also their UU is the worst in the game and comes way to late. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,099
|
USA! USA! USA! sucks...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tsalagi
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tansi, USA
Posts: 4,098
|
Well, a lot depends on style. So, based on my play I voted Britain. Its UU is less effective than America's simply because of its range. The F-15, utilizing carriers, can be far-reaching.
Expansionist is useful early on in getting extra techs from villages, but I don't think settlers are any cheaper. They should be or it takes away only one pop when built. Industrious is better than commercial. When it comes to production and gaining turn-advantage over the AI, industrious is the way to go. Particularly, when you're racing to build wonders.
__________________
"And now, cried Max, let the wild rumpus start!" --- Maurice Sendak (Where the Wild Things Are) "According to your faith, be it unto you." --- Jesus (Matthew 9:29) GOTM66 (PTW): Green Shield GOTM39 (Civ4): Purple Shield CivRev (DS) FC -> 0302-1438-9435
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Leftist Loyalist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Frozen North
Posts: 1,140
|
Britian is terrible, it's expansionist which is ok becuase the early game in my opinion is the most important but completly and uterly useless aftwards and commericial is aother word, you get extra money, which could be used to finance your units of city improvments, but it has a TERRIBLE UU, The Man-O-War is completly useless, it has one more attack and bombardment but there not useful very long, especially once ironclads start to appear which shouldn't take to long....and Elizabeth is freaky looking but that's beside the point all in all both America and Britian take the cake ass the worst Civs ever
__________________
I love you tree born kettle girl! "to alcohol! The cause of and solution to all of life's problems!"- Homer Simpson |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
God
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,354
|
America isn't that bad. I tried them out. Industrious is amazing and expansionist is very good too. Check out the HOF thread to see Bamspeedy and Ronald's games as the American civ. Their games are both amazing!
Worst IMO would be Romans. Their UU has great stats, but I really don't care about 3 defense. I don't want to use them as defense because they won't upgrade later on. Militaristic a pretty good trait, but then play as any other military civ. They all are much better. Commercial is a horrible trait too. Money's never a huge deal in any of my games. Greece isn't that great either.
__________________
I AM GOD Changed...really changed... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23
|
On general purpose, I voted France. Anyone who pickets McDonald's deserves to be shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 261
|
Tough. Religious and Industrious are my favorite traits but I hate (hate hate hate) Egypt's UU. America has a terrible UU too (too late), but is industrious.
I'll say England. Bad UU and comecial and expansionistic are my least favorite traits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 205
|
France. What a waste of a UU. The other UU's will at least use whatever their bonus is, but who is going to use Musketeers extensively for attacking? I use them sometimes to take out a one hp defender, but if you have knights and longbowmen anyway they become quite useless.
And they are pink.
__________________
PAX AMERICANA Member of the Inlightened Imperialist Party |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Mmm...tasty!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Piedmont Triad, North Carolina
Posts: 6,255
|
Is this Worst Civ to play or play against?
Actually, I like US. I suffer mightily when I don't have Industrious, and Expansionist is sometimes good to go (not on Archipelago, though). The UU is unimportant to me, because I rarely depend upon a UU for a Golden Age (it's usually the Wonders that do it for me). There isn't a single Civ that has led me to say "Man these guys suck" so I vote "none of the above" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 38
|
CHrTH: This is the worst Civ to play as.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Worst game of civ ever!! | BigJohn138 | Civ4 - General Discussions | 6 | Jun 21, 2008 10:57 AM |
| whats the worst thing that can happen in a Civ game | Inspector Javert | Civ4 - General Discussions | 41 | Oct 19, 2007 01:10 AM |
| Worst civ in ur opinion for a monarch game | dark_pretender | Civ3 - General Discussions | 20 | Mar 05, 2007 01:48 PM |
| Worst Civ & Civ Leader in the Ancient and Classical Ages? | wc3promet | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 1 | Dec 20, 2005 04:11 PM |
| Worst Civ | Squirrel Ninja | Civ3 - General Discussions | 43 | Mar 20, 2002 02:09 PM |