Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION IV > Civ4 - Creation & Customization > Civ4 - Project & Mod Development > Civ4 - Fall from Heaven

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 11, 2008, 09:21 PM   #1
MetalMilitia-
Warlord
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 132
Marathon

So, anybody have any experience with playing the mod on marathon speed?

Specificly does the AI seem to play worse (than usual)
MetalMilitia- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 09:44 PM   #2
Verily
Prince
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 551
Marathon is generally easier for the human player, but not for the reasons you'd expect. The main problem is that unit movement is not scaled with the rest of the timing. Since the biggest advantage human players have over the AI is in warfare, Epic is about one difficulty level easier than Normal, and Marathon another difficulty level easier than Epic (assuming you do go to war fairly frequently; pacifist humans would get no such advantage).
Verily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 10:39 PM   #3
DrStalker
Chieftain
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 59
Some things scale in ways that work much better in marathon; for example, Shieam planar gates have a chance to spawn units that doesn't take the game speed into account. Combine that with summoning and you have some huge advantages over civs that are slowly building units.
DrStalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 11, 2008, 11:44 PM   #4
Justicar333
Chieftain
 
Justicar333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Richmond, Ky
Posts: 98
Only play on Marathon myself. It's my observation that it changes the feel of battle. That huge army the computer sends in can be devestating, but if you take it out, they won't rebuild for a long time. National units become much more valuable, and the computer has a lot of trouble managing effective wave tactics. Where as a human can compensate with summoner armies.

My Calibim ends up working much along those lines. Core of Vampires with disposable skeleton foot troops. Altogether combat relys more on finesse than brute force. Something the computer doesn't manage well. Though it's tendacy for assasain type units can become quite a pain, so it's not helpless in any measure.
Justicar333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 12, 2008, 01:02 AM   #5
Sarisin
Deity
 
Sarisin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,795
When FFH first came out I played only Marathon games on Huge maps.

However, since Hyborem and other changes were made I had to dial back to Epic and Large maps as that is about all my system can handle. Otherwise late game is really a chore with long times between turns when the map is filled and the AI has to move all their units around.

One reason I liked Marathon speed was that it slowed down the expand-only mentality of the AI as building times were much slower. I haven't played Marathon lately, but I know in my Epic games the bad guys (Skeletons, Lizardmen, etc.) come rather early. When it takes you around 50 turns to build that first Warrior, I would guess it would be problematic in Marathon speed games.

As stated, another reason I liked Marathon was that you had a chance to build all the units after researching everything. Some heroes and units come late and you may never see them in shorter speed games IMO.
Sarisin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 12, 2008, 01:51 AM   #6
marioflag
History Addict
 
marioflag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Napoli, Italy
Posts: 1,867
I personally find Marathon a lot more unbalanced than Normal speed, mostly due to combat experience.
In general at this speed you could easily get some sort of superunit with a lot of promotions which become nearly unkillable if well supported with other units.
So early rushes, or destroying other empires become a lot more easy.
On Marathon speed there are also lot of features which needs to be scaled down to speed, these are some examples:
-I played only one time as Sidar at Marathon and they were clearly unbalanced for their mechanics
-considering that Hero promotion give 1xp/turn on Normal it can be balanced but on Marathon which is 1800 turns instead of 600 it becomes clearly out of balance. For that reason heroes are completely overpowered
-early rushes are too much effective particularly if you have a stronger unit like the Worg Rider or Doviello units


In general considering that combat experience is broken at Marathon speed i would strongly advise to turn on the option to halve xp gained from combat, to balance a bit the combat factor, and to play at higher difficulty levels than you normally would have played at Normal speed
marioflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 12, 2008, 05:09 AM   #7
Alzara
Emperor
 
Alzara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by marioflag View Post
I personally find Marathon a lot more unbalanced than Normal speed, mostly due to combat experience.
You can select the "slower XP" option if you play on this speed which will prevent this issue. Personally I don't go slower than epic

Al
Alzara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2008, 06:04 AM   #8
Arctic Circle
Prince
 
Arctic Circle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 473
Why havn't anyone mentioned Sidar, when you mention Marathon speed. Hmm, I suspect that the -long- time-span to gather experience really benefit them. Honestly I feel that Sidars units should be able to become 'Shadows' at a level that is modified by the game-speed.
Arctic Circle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2008, 08:36 AM   #9
Blackmantle
King
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Berlin, Europe
Posts: 897
@ Arctic Circle: You are right. Even at Epic Sidar are about 1-2 difficulties easier (In Marathon its completely riddiculous but that takes to long for FFH2 anyways imo. And i do like long games. But FFH2 takes care of that without tempering with gamespeed already.).
Not least because their more or less best way to research is straight for Warmongering (rush military strategy after mysticism if you find copper near at mining. Then go KotE for Enchanted Blade) which is much more potent in slower gamespeeds.

But they are allready "balanced" somewhat on paper by the different value of the yields (1 7 is worth much more in quick than in marathon.).
But that doesn't really translate into a real parity due to a maximum number of units gained per Turn = 1 so you proportionally get up to 4 Times as many Warriors / Scouts built at Marathon in comparison to normal or 8! Times as many as in Quick. Which more or less directly translates into shades gained. Also the critical time to get the first 3-5 Shades gets to be proportionally much later.
Also if given the choice of 1 Shade in quick or 4 in Epic (more or less the same balanced yield on paper) i whould take 4 in Epic any day of the week because of the ability to customize and spread out. (all 4 Choices are decent.)

Sidar are only really fully playable / balanced at normal speed (and they are a rather powerful civ at that speed + my favorite civ.) at slower they are to powerful to be balanced (since there is no difficulty above deity their is no constant challenge possible in all games the way the AI is now + the harder you are pushed, the stronger you get. But sure that will change soon enough.) at quick they become a rather weak civ since all their strong points suffer and their traits are weak for that gamespeed.
(Problem with adding one Level for each gamespeed for Shading and Starting at 5 at Quick / 6 normal / 7 Epic / 8 Marathon whould be that free XP can be made available out of the box. That again whould make it to easy to get shades at quick just to get it balanced for epic. And at Marathon the curve might be to steep + the half-xp option is there for a reason.
Thats enough of a fix which can be done and is highly reccomended if you want any challenge from the game while playing sidar at marathon.)

So if you play slower just enable half-xp from combats. Should fix the thing allright.
FFH 2 is balanced for nomal speed (qoute from Kael / FFH 2-Team)

Last edited by Blackmantle; Jul 14, 2008 at 09:06 AM.
Blackmantle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION IV > Civ4 - Creation & Customization > Civ4 - Project & Mod Development > Civ4 - Fall from Heaven > Marathon

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
marathon? jkp1187 Civ4 - Better AI 2 Feb 12, 2007 05:16 PM
Marathon Dantius II Civ4 - Strategy & Tips 11 Apr 12, 2006 07:46 PM
Marathon naminator Civ4 - General Discussions 6 Jan 12, 2006 05:55 AM
Marathon . . . no, not *that* Marathon Andrew_Jay Civ3 - Completed Scenarios 7 Jun 23, 2005 09:50 AM
Marathon Bamspeedy Sports Talk 3 Sep 20, 2004 09:35 PM


Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR