| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
Good strategy or exploit?
I'm really enjoying my latest game, my first in a while. I'm playing the Ljosfar on emperor. With a shuffle map, I wound up on a continent with the Liurchup. I got the Ljosfar going, with FoL founded, teching well. I beat up the Liurchup and vassalized them.
On the other continent, Hyborem is brought in while I'll consolidating my continent and foresting it with my priests. Then, on some unsettled territory, I see a pillar of chains and hell terrain. My son, (an immortal player) told me that this was trouble. If hell terrain spreads, it will kill my forests and I go from bad-ass elves to treeless non-entity. Two strategies. I can build about 20 adepts and cast sanctify forever, but this is probably a losing battle. What he told me to do, however, was switch to Order. I reserach it, get it, get a city to have order in it, and switch. Now, I'm good and hell terrain won't spread. Then, he said, wait the 10 turns and switch back to Fellowship of Leaves. I'm still good, and now I have my religion back and stopped the hell terrain from moving. Is this an exploit or a good tactic? I do suffer two anarchy periods, and I lose the abiltiy to build druids since I'm good. On the other hand, it was a powerhouse tactic and I got many times back what it cost. Is there an 'official' view on this, exploit or tactic? Best wishes, Breunor Last edited by Breunor; Oct 04, 2008 at 08:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Scion Doomgiver
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 281
|
It's fine, don't worry.
If you feel its exploity, don't do it, if you have no issue with using religion to permanently change your align around while keeping FoL, then do it. Not like Kael is going to track you down and kick your dog for doing it.
__________________
World of Warcraft, Civilization 5, tossing drunks out of bars. Such is my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
![]() I know Kael isn't going to beat me up (or send thousands of volts through my computer, although i don't doubt he could if he wanted to!) Seriously, though, I am at least theoretically interested in whether this is 'intended' from a play balance standpoint. I know some people think the Ljostfar are very strong; and FoL is so well made for them. Does this make them too good? I suspect it is probably OK, since one of the Ljostfar leaders is good anyway which would avoid the problem -- but this can be a powerful tactic for any civ. Indeed, it can impact diplomacy. A Civ can change to good or bad by taking the Veil or the Order and switching back to one of the neutral religions. Would it be fair to get the + on diplomacy from the same alignment? So, yes, I can easily just not do it if its an exploit. The reason I ask is that I just haven't played FfH that much and I don't know how the designers are balancing the game. I'm asking if the designers intended to give the Civ's the ability to get these benefits in such a fashion? I can see the answer being yes, that a civ should have the right to declare itself good or evil and the mechanic of switching to the religion is OK. (You can switch to neutral by switching to order and then OO!) Or I can see the answer is no, that the Ljosfar/Svartalfar Leaves combination is very powerful but the hell terrain tactic is specifically supposed to be a weakness. Best wishes, Bruenor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 368
|
Yes it is intended to be something you can take advantage of, however as the neutral elves you do not have to worry about hell terrain spreading to land you control until the AC hits 75.
__________________
Slovotsky's Laws #31: Get scared right away; avoid the rush. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Weyauwega, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,466
|
It is actually balanced; if the AC is at 75 and you have to becoem Good to stop Hell terrain, then any Evil players will start to gang up on you... including Hyborum, who can ramp up in strength really quickly with enough combat in the world.
Now, in your particular game, you sound like you're isolated so it's not an issue. Go ahead and switch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Deity
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 17,392
|
I even like the flavor of this solution. Armageddon is supposed to polarize the world and the fact that you shifted further toward good in the coming war works perfectly. The other option would have been to lower the AC counter to a point where hell doesnt spread into neutral lands and stay neutral.
__________________
Civ4: Fall from Heaven II (forum) (webpage), FfH: Age of Ice Civ5: Queen of the Iceni, Legions, Modders Guide to Civilization V Current Project: Fallen Enchantress |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 378
|
Couldnt you also stay neutral and get several levels of the alter built to stop the spread of hell terrain in your lands?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
Best wishes, Breunor Last edited by Breunor; Oct 01, 2008 at 07:11 PM. Reason: Correction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,632
|
Wait, I'm confused; Kael, you told me to put Bruenor on our list of "cat owners" not "dog owners"!
__________________
Fall From Heaven II |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Deity
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 17,392
|
It doesn't (it was really hard on the processor to maintain).
__________________
Civ4: Fall from Heaven II (forum) (webpage), FfH: Age of Ice Civ5: Queen of the Iceni, Legions, Modders Guide to Civilization V Current Project: Fallen Enchantress |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Scion Doomgiver
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 281
|
Would be interesting if you could get buildings that you could create on tiles to fight back any hell terrain that spreads in a 1 tile radius.
__________________
World of Warcraft, Civilization 5, tossing drunks out of bars. Such is my life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Strategy Lich
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Goleta, California
Posts: 1,866
|
It'd be freaking awesome if Order Nodes countered the growth around them in, say, a 2 square radius. (Maybe life instead?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
Best wishes, Breunor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
King
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Berlin, Europe
Posts: 897
|
Also mind that this makes sense in flavor as well. Kael did outline it roughly allready.
But in the world itself it likely comes down to: The Order hirarchy rallies you to fight off the Demons and remain pure in heart and deed to prevent you Forests from becoming corrupted. And the FoL you'll follow after your second switch will focus morely on the protective / nurturing side of nature (good FoL) rather than its pure indifferent form (neutral FoL). So its not really the "same religion" in practice. Thats what the FoL is all about after all. Diversity. And the impending demise of the elves beloved forests may very well trigger such a change of mind. (The other possible choice of course whould be to embrace the taint, switch to Veil (and stay with it), run StW and let your Forests decay abolishing your old love for greener pastures. Or if you want to stay neutral go around sanctifying / be forced to actively fight Armageddon.)Go over and kick Hyborems butt allright... ![]() Also there is a huge tradeoff: No Druids (or at least no further Druids). That alone is quite a cost. (Since they are the strongest of the 3 Tier 4 religious fighters overall. At least imo.) Last edited by Blackmantle; Oct 02, 2008 at 08:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Tyranny and Mutation
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York State
Posts: 2,235
|
Quote:
But I agree its not an exploit. If you switch your religion you lose all your religious units, including heroes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Dragon
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Torino - Italia
Posts: 6,456
|
not an exploit but not necessarily a good strategy (nor a God strategy
). The best strategy is to colonize unsettled territory, also I doubt you need 20 adepts; in case you really need it means you are so huge you should be off destroying Hyborem already.
__________________
2010AD, Caesar Berlusconi to Brutus Fini: "You too, Gianfranco, son of a b... !!!" Economic Left/Right: -4.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
The worst part of this strategy is losing my heroes; the good news, though is that I rebuilt them. I wanted to wait for them to get up in strength. I'm outbuilding the bad guys. I wanted to do two things before the invasion. First was to get control of the seas. On a continent maps, the ship stuff can be important. But the really big thing was that I got the Nexus. That allows me to send in reinforcements quickly. I invaded the turn after I finished the nexus. To Kael's early point, this HAS worked well on a flavor standpoint. After all, I killed a bunch of really nasty horsemen and I am the force against evil in the world. Yup, it is up to my to take on Hyborem, that's a role I'm taking. So my being 'good' kind of does make sense. I've just started the war. I do think I will win, my mages are very, very strong. But I have a long way to go ...... Best wishes, Breunor PS Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to edit the thread name. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Secret Emperor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Where you least expect me
Posts: 2,035
|
The way you change thread names is to polity ask Woodelf or another moderator to change it.
__________________
Tarquin: My name will be immortalized forever. Elan: As a villian! Tarquin: Thats the beauty of it all. If I win, I get to be a king. If I loose, I get to be a legend. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Exploit or possible Strategy? | icantdrawanime | Civ4 - General Discussions | 16 | Jul 26, 2007 04:40 PM |
| Is this an exploit or a strategy pt II? | OTAKUjbski | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 42 | Apr 21, 2007 03:59 AM |
| Is this an exploit or a strategy? | OTAKUjbski | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 33 | Apr 17, 2007 10:42 PM |
| Strategy, or Exploit? | obsolete | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 9 | Jan 02, 2007 03:17 PM |
| Sacrificing your population. Strategy or exploit | Studlybob23 | Civ4 - Multiplayer & PBEM | 12 | Nov 07, 2006 01:30 PM |