| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Modmod Monkey
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
Naval Changes
I've just updated the changelog with the following;
Spoiler for Changelog:
The aim is to give each ship type a more concrete role. All requirements for bonuses in the Sailing/Optics era (copper/iron) have been removed. Sailing era Galley - Early Transport (extra transport capacity) Trireme - Early Escort (more easily available as no copper prereq) Optics Era Carrack - Escort (new unit, takes role of frigate) Galleon - Transport (moved earlier in the tree to encourage inter-continental war) Privateer - Anti-Transport (stronger vs transports, weaker vs others) Caravel - Exploration (added decent withdrawal chance) Astronomy Era Frigate - Patrol/Escort (faster, hunts for sneaky transports and pirates) Queen of the Line - Transport (unchanged) Man O'War - Heavy Warship/Defensive (slower, long ranged, heavy hitter) === Feedback welcomed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 473
|
Sounds good to me.
__________________
The Jotnar - A Giant Civ for Fall Further |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 516
|
does this imply the death of the change crew type function as presumably that helps muddy the ship roles (...although I do actually think it's a neat little function, just not sure whether the AI grasps it)?
Just thinking that perhaps with Astronomy, other nations (and the Lanun for their other ship types) could purchase the ability to have Buccaneer crew...or a weaker 'Boarding Party' version? Whilst that may be perceived as a nerf for the Lanun, I think opening up this ability across the civs would make the whole naval thing a lot more interesting |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 516
|
Also notice you've added Trade ships in the main changelog - do these count as transport ships for piracy purposes...and can they be captured (and if so exchanged for a (presumable) gold boost at a home port by the piratical player)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Modmod Monkey
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
=== In return though, the trade ship will be a decent source of income, if you can maintain open borders with a reasonably distant, large, foreign port. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 124
|
Perhaps trade ships can't enter "blockaded" waters without escort of some sort?
And a deeper degree of customization would be nice... crews, guns and sails. + orbi style pirates (combat I + a promotion) really gives active combat and venom to the game. Every strait becomes a battle ground and a strong navy is more necessary. Perhaps it's too much, but i like it. Edit: 10 gp per kill is by far not enough.... more gold or perhaps 1/2 - 1/4 the hammer cost of the trade ship. The hammers gained would be extra cargo and need space + safe transport to a friendly harbor. Last edited by Gilg; Nov 11, 2008 at 10:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Flavournator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 1,008
|
Very nice change and sorely needed. My biggest hope is, that the AI will be able to do a better job out on the ocean now. Let's see how it turns out and hope for the best.
I'm not sure if I like your change to make all the earlier ships independet of resources. Maybe there is another way. When I was playing Rise of Mankind some weeks ago I kind of liked the property "builds x1 % faster with y1 and x2 % faster with y2 ...". I know a tag for this is available for buildings already, but i'm not that sure, that something like this exists for units in FF as well. Might be worth implementing, if not.
__________________
Past member of the Fall Further team [forum] - Solo projects: BTS: Culturally Linked Starts, FFH: FlavourMod 2.8.2 for Fall from Heaven 0.41j |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
Modmod Monkey
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
Quote:
The 10 gold is basically a bonus though for intercepting the ship - there's no game mechanic reason to give the attacking player anything in return. They've destroyed a ship costing their opponent a number of hammers for no return, plus the experience earned for the kill. Only the privateer classes of ships should be really encouraged to look for these ships and when combined with the pirate's inherent bonus, it can be quite a nice bit of gold anyway... Quote:
Last edited by Vehem; Nov 11, 2008 at 12:09 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
WM junkie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seyda Neen, Vvardenfell
Posts: 7,090
|
good changes, this will definitely make ships more interesting. does it also help the AI settle overseas lands? that would be truly great
__________________
" Sheelba does what Charadon't " - Senethro |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Modmod Monkey
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
Galleys having a cargo capacity from the start should do that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
Follower of Tytalus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,285
|
Looks like a significant improvement!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(I made an "Age of Sail" mod for Civ3 - my desires vis a vis ships might be unusual and somewhat excessive. )
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Modmod Monkey
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
There's definitely a thematic place for it being as there were 5 or 6 first rate vessels in the British Navy at any given point compared to nearly 100 or so third rate vessels, but I'm mostly looking at mechanics so far. ==== With the Pirates vs Frigates - the Frigates are now third tier, so the instant response of any Pirate ship should be "run!" - there should be an era in which pirates are fairly dominant (might pay to keep the strength as-is to ensure that), but once the larger warships come out they become somewhat opportunistic tools. Checking back over things - I think you're right. It probably is best to keep the Privateers at Str 8. They need to outclass Trireme's at least and should be only slightly weaker than Carrack/Brigs (know of a good unit model for the Brig?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Great Sage
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kael's head
Posts: 14,060
|
I don't think that Pirates or Privateers should be units at all; their abilities should be moved to promotions that you could give to any naval units. Pirates are Privateers historically used the same basic types of ships as the regular navy did. Most would be smaller ships like Corvettes, with Pirate Kings themselves occasionally using captured Men O War.
I prefer making Piracy make the unit HN and get gold from combat, and make Letters of Marque make the unit AlwaysHostile and get gold from combat. Dwarves need an Ironclad UU. It might also be nice to have Icebreaker ships that can move though sea ice (which would be important in my version where Temples of the Hand/Snowfall can create sea ice.) Last edited by MagisterCultuum; Nov 11, 2008 at 02:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Follower of Tytalus
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,285
|
Hmm... I'd make the Man O'War a National Unit - quite strong - and the in-between unit would be for everywhere you don't have a Man O'War but want more than a Frigate. It's ranged attack would be 1 or 2 steps below the Man O'Wars - nonexistant if the MOW's attack isn't sufficiently powerful/long ranged.
So, role-wise, I'd make the Man O'War a special, cool, unit and offer the new unit in as the normal Astronomy-era warship. Outside ranged bombardment there'd be no extra role: More putting a cherry on top of the naval warfare cake. Or maybe sundae - a banana boat. Quote:
It might be best to use it as the Privateer - it looks very fast and sleek - and use the current Privateer model as the Optics-era Escort.
__________________
I know how God can make a rock so big He can't lift it. FFH2 modular mod thread. Fall Further modules thread. Last edited by Tarquelne; Nov 11, 2008 at 03:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 516
|
In between unit name "Ship of the Line" perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
WM junkie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seyda Neen, Vvardenfell
Posts: 7,090
|
an icebreaker ship ( alternatively, you could implement it as a crew or a promotion ) would be nice. if you let it move on impassable ice and terraform it to water as soon as the unit is standing on the tile, the AI should be able to use it as well
__________________
" Sheelba does what Charadon't " - Senethro |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 308
|
Tarquelne suggestion of Making Man-o-War slightly stronger but as a national unit is a very good idea. It would still allow for pirate fleets to attack poorly escorted merchants but "proper" navy escorts would out gun them. Really nice mechanic - reminds me of the aircraft carriers in regular Civ
Last edited by Willgar; Nov 12, 2008 at 04:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 124
|
I see so much potential in MC's suggestion.
A permanent minus 20% strength would give any ship a wee challenge if trying to go the way of piracy. One of the reasons I advocate using promotions is that I do not believe that trade ships and privateers will be the silencer of "unused oceans" discussions. Ships are a "luxury", they may be necessary to build empires, but they can't take cities by themselves. Ships need all the help they can get. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 202
|
I like MC's suggestion of making pirate a promotion. Make it available to lanun right off the bat, and maybe a later promotion for other civs. Also, it would be nice if that promotion allowed "HN" and remove HN spells -- but only castable within your boarders, or maybe within your cities and pirate ports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Lost in Erebus
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 337
|
Kudos to the FF team adding these couple of huge changes in the next release~
(imagining myself torn between playing Ice scenarios or FF over winter break )I did notice an interesting lack of reference to the arcane barge--so... is it removed/changed/left the same? With the current huge increase in strength of naval units though, I definitely see the arcane barges taking a HUGE hit on utility--its fireballs are gonna simply bounce off these new frigates like a ping-pong ball. If left unchanged, its only use is to toss fireball bombardment at land units (in which it seems that the new man'o'wars can do now) Another naval issue I would like to discuss would be regarding OO. Similar to the above, with ship and sea creature str going up by as much as 40% in 0.34, OO's naval prowess has taken a huge hit. It does make sense that cultists shouldn't be a match to heavy warships (I agree with the cultists/ship str ratio). But, having the Kraken stay the exact same str as before, makes the high priests kind of obselete. Religious Law and Theology are very expensive techs, and simply to get one free "strong" man' o war feels slightly too little for the beaker/upgrading costs. (=P maybe I should post it on the main forum too since it applies there as well, but I guess I'll see how naval warfare pans out in FF first) Last edited by heisenberg; Nov 13, 2008 at 02:06 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Naval Support? | UndyingXian | CivRev - General Discussions | 3 | Jul 07, 2008 08:41 PM |
| Moding Naval pillage rates, and naval bombardment | rcspring | Civ4 - Creation & Customization | 0 | Aug 07, 2007 10:18 AM |
| Naval Wonder | RUBBLEBEAM | Civ4 - Creation & Customization | 2 | Nov 18, 2006 02:24 AM |
| Naval Aviation and such | G-Force Junkie | Civ - Ideas & Suggestions | 20 | Jul 31, 2004 01:11 PM |
| Naval Units, Naval Warfare is WRONG | Kid Casco | Civ3 - General Discussions | 48 | Jun 03, 2003 01:42 PM |