Free for All vs. Teams

[Manock]

A comment on Free for All vs. Team player. If I wanted to play Teams w/ players secretly trading techs between them I would play Team.

But I dont preferring to play Free for All where as the name implies everyone is out for themselves.

How about a little less anti competitive conduct here. Winning in Civ Rev MP does notgive you a faster car, a bigger house, or a better looking girlfriend.

Lets get our egos under control.

Your local spoil sport & dick.
Manock14
gamertag

[Kadazzle]

Play head to head then? :P

[MorteEterna]

Originally Posted by Kadazzle

Play head to head then? :P

Not so easy to say.

However, the two times I remember about teams, they lost, and do you want to know how I won?

First game: Captured a great builder and sold it (in the enemy territory), both of them quit (I understood they were in the same team)
Second game: 3v1, the aztec build the city near me, I kill him, all of them quit.

[Manock]

How much did you get for the Great Builder? Havent tried that yet.

[MorteEterna]

Originally Posted by Manock

How much did you get for the Great Builder? Havent tried that yet.

You get 15 gold for every great person. That's a thing I do using americans when that's not useful.