| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Squidtastic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
|
Tech Recosting and the Arcane path
As an avid magic addict, the tech recosting has changed my strategy significantly. Whereas before I didn't necessarily have to worry about the beaker count beyond ensuring I had a couple of cities pumping out good weird science, I now have to actively pursue a sage sink, a city that pumps out sages that are settled as great scientists.
While I'm sure that at lower difficulties and less distressing game options the tech recosting isn't an issue, I find that at emperor and above I can't pursue the higher tech brackets effectively without establishing a research monster. Any comments or thoughts on how tech recosting has affected your game? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 70
|
Isn't it pretty much standard strategy to create a "great person farm" city regardless of the Civ version/mod? Seems like in FfH I get sages more often than anything else by default. I have to go out of my way to get, say, prophets to build the Altars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,386
|
Orgonebox,
Is this an issue of tech recosting, or is it the change to cottage growth? With cottage growth nerfed, of course, the relative benefits of a specialist based economy are greater. I agree that great scientists are a little easier, say, than FfH because getting an Elder Counsel isn't too hard. I've tended to use cottage based economies (and I also play at Emperor) and I am rethinking that strategy. Best wishes, Breunor |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Squidtastic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
|
The specialization necessity might be due in part to the cottage growth nerf, but I've always played a mixed economy game, and never had to specialize beyond the wish for a particular type of great person. The new tech recosting certainly affects the player more than the AI. In a current game, both the Lanun and the Hippus have teched far past my luchuirps, in spite of me stomping the lanun down to one city within the first 175 turns. The hippus have just gone off the hook, as usual, and it's only by diplomatic manipulation that I can keep other civs at war with them. Overall, there's a definite sense that to keep up with the AI at a higher level (and by "keep up", I mean stay within a thousand points), you have to focus on science - pure raw beakers plus whatever bonuses you can build/settle. If you can build a cottage monster AND settle that as a science city, then you're gold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Feels so good...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pacifica, California
Posts: 1,998
|
As an avid divine magic addict, commune with nature's recosting breaks my balls. Druids upgraded from mid-level priests are the pinnacle of that path, even more so than high priests, especially if you're a dwarf.
Aside from that most of the techs I really like have been cheapened or kept the same, with a few slight increases being the exception. Never really cared for the high-end arcane line (with the exception of pass through the ether for military victories on big maps, and that's been cheapened, even though AL's more expensive). Never been big on the high tier martial NUs either, which require the other techs with notably huge cost increases. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Squidtastic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AI Tech Path? | Bandobras Took | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 21 | Feb 09, 2009 03:22 PM |
| Tech path | ThyGuy | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 22 | Jun 08, 2008 09:32 PM |
| confused about what starting arcane tech to go with (such as necromancery) | smjjames | Civ4 - Fall from Heaven | 22 | Apr 01, 2008 12:17 AM |
| New tech path | grant2004 | Civ4 - Demo Game II: Citizens | 13 | May 08, 2007 12:16 PM |
| Tech path brainstorming | Khaim | Civ4 - Strategy & Tips | 10 | Oct 27, 2005 05:21 PM |