| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should we switch our research to polytheism? | |||
| Yes |
|
10 | 40.00% |
| No, keep researching literature |
|
14 | 56.00% |
| No, switch to math or map making or something else |
|
0 | 0% |
| Abstain |
|
1 | 4.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Low level intermediary
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 12,873
|
Should we switch to researching polytheism?
We are currently researching literature despite strong citizen support for a research path to monarchy.
At our current rate of research it will take 33 turns to finish researching literature and 40 turns to research monarchy. this post in the FNSD thread contains links to previous polls on our science queue. This poll will be open for 3 days.
__________________
Still playing after all these years. Last edited by donsig; Oct 20, 2002 at 06:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
is not a pipe.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: deceiving people with images
Posts: 5,428
|
Now, for my daily complaint against donsig
![]() Literaure will be more beneficial right now. First of all, if we did switch, by the time we finished monarchy, the war would've been long over. I seriouly doubt it will last 80 turns. Second, we have virtually no culture. Libraries, made available by literature, will be the backbone of our cultural strength. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,233
|
we will get literature from the aztecs by the end of war propably. they will trade cheap with the other civs, and if we are successful we can bribe it out of them. we are strong, they are weak.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
der Besucher
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,546
|
Yes, we should switch. Over and over the path to Monarchy was shown as preferred by the populous. The only times it was defeated is when Monarchy was not mentioned and the choices were things like Great Library vs. Mysticism. We want a king!
Literature is an often researched tech by the AI. We will get it from them. As an optional tech, Monarchy is researched much later by the AI and sometimes not at all. We should be spending our resources to get these techs that will not already be falling into our laps. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,158
|
personally i hope this measure doesnt reach quorum. Seems to be this one keeps getting beaten to death and lit always seems to win overall
give it up you will get you heoric epic and the cuture peeps can get their culture. we need a balanced plan people, we are so one sided its not funny
__________________
morriganinteractive Check at my gallery at DeviantArt You have nothing to fear but fear itself - Franklin D. Roosevelt | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,158
|
One more thing to add. I think that your letting the RPG influence the tech queue a bit. We dont need need a king, Id rather have a consul
__________________
morriganinteractive Check at my gallery at DeviantArt You have nothing to fear but fear itself - Franklin D. Roosevelt | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,233
|
EDIT:
deleted previous comment new comment: i think a binding official poll is needed here. there are so many disputes about this and obviously no chance to find a concensus that the populace has to have a final decission about this topic. Last edited by disorganizer; Oct 21, 2002 at 03:14 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,158
|
Then Strider and i emphasize Strider should take the bull by the horns and post a single definitive poll outlining out tech research.
__________________
morriganinteractive Check at my gallery at DeviantArt You have nothing to fear but fear itself - Franklin D. Roosevelt | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
der Besucher
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,546
|
"We need a King" is a euphanism for needing the monarchy form of government. Nothing to do with the RPG.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,158
|
Like i said before we dont need monarchy. Kings were oppressive and thought they were gods right hand men, ick no, Republic is the way since the goverment is for the people by the people right?
__________________
morriganinteractive Check at my gallery at DeviantArt You have nothing to fear but fear itself - Franklin D. Roosevelt | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,233
|
Fionn: The science departmen can not ignore the decission of populace to go to war. In republic, we wont win the war. In Monarchy, we will. I believe that one is donsigs point on posting the poll. Our main-direction is set to war. Nothing else.
EDIT: btw i dont believe we will manage to build the GL. we only have 3 cities compared to propably 6-7 ai-cities. and also we have to produce for a already decided war. no chance for GL imho. so why bother to research it? we wont even have spare shields to build libraries! |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,158
|
ive managed to win more wars with republic than monarchy
__________________
morriganinteractive Check at my gallery at DeviantArt You have nothing to fear but fear itself - Franklin D. Roosevelt | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,233
|
in the given level or below or above?
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,158
|
i won a war in monarch level (which was a pain in the you know what) with republic. It shouldnt matter what difficulty your in, besides by the time we do go to war we wont have monarchy anyways so its kind of a dead issue
__________________
morriganinteractive Check at my gallery at DeviantArt You have nothing to fear but fear itself - Franklin D. Roosevelt | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,233
|
well, but you must admit this poll will finally stop this endless discussion. i would propose to let this be the last poll on that issue and then do what it sais if it reaches quorum.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Eponymous
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,635
|
Yes, we really should switch to polytheism. Not because of the war, but because a switch to monarchy will be far more beneficial than a library ridden despotism. Monarchy is also a much better government for future warmongering and gives us the option of acquiring the Hanging Gardens. We can get literacy later on, when we have a nation and government that is ready to extract real benefit from those libraries.
__________________
"In general, someone is a thing of value if and only if he or she is willing to submit to whatever degradation and abuse is required to preserve that position. Anything less betrays a lack of commitment." - Steve Albini |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Low level intermediary
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 12,873
|
Quote:
This early on we can't be balanced. We decided to be war like and have built an army. It is time to use that army to defeat the Aztecs. At the same time we must keep building our strength because we are between America and Japan. They will not sit by while we absorb Azteca. Any sign of weaknesson our part and one or both of them will pounce. I do not foresee a shor war with the Aztecs and then 3000 years of peace. I do hope everyone understands that our desire to have monarchy soon does not mean we want to be a monarchy forever. I, too, understand the benefits of war making as a republic. Trouble is we don't have the infrastructure (markets and trading partners) that we need to support a republic at war. That day will come but it is far off. In the mean time we can reap many benefits by entering a period of monarchy. And Shaitan is right, our desire for monarchy is based on our needs inthe Civ s game not the RPG game.
__________________
Still playing after all these years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Starfleet Admiral
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bleckede,Northern Germany
Posts: 2,284
|
Yes,of course.Monarchy is what I want!
__________________
India in StJnes2,India in RTOR 2,India in NaNES,Siederia in StJnes,Turkey in stGMNes 1,Spain in RNES 1,Melitus in StJnes 3,Japan in World Wide NES,Egypt in PureNES,Saxony in ENES3 |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fanatika - Where did everybody go?
Posts: 1,381
|
I've always said "Monarchy" up till today when I think Literature will be better for our Scientific civ. We just don't have enough cities to support Monarchy and I think we'll start losing money should we switch too soon. The lower military support will be more than the income we recover from lower corruption.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
der Besucher
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,546
|
Monarchy makes more than despotism in all cases. It is Republic that requires infrastructure to beat despotism.
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ibbisine Polytheism | Provolution | Civ4 - Demo Game IV: Citizens | 2 | Jul 07, 2008 04:29 AM |
| Why is monotheism an advance on polytheism? | Afgnwrlrd | Civ4 - General Discussions | 144 | Aug 17, 2005 04:09 PM |
| Between Polytheism and Monotheism ... | Ozymandias | Civ3 - Creation & Customization | 11 | Jun 07, 2004 03:16 AM |
| Term 3 Science Ministry - From Researching Monotheism to still researching Monotheism | Bootstoots | Civ3 - Multi-site Demo Game: High Council | 22 | Oct 12, 2003 04:35 PM |
| Trades for Polytheism | DaveShack | Civ3 - Demo Game III: Citizens | 3 | Jun 17, 2003 10:55 AM |