|
| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
 |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Nov 11, 2002, 02:34 PM
|
#1 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grankulla, Finland
Posts: 55
|
What about taking away bombardment from land units?
Would it be a good idea to take away bombardment from the land unit a remake them to normal units like making the catapult to 4.1.1? I never anyway use bombardment and neither do the AI or would it unbalace the game?
|
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2002, 02:39 PM
|
#2 |
|
Yumbo? Yumbo!
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Snack Food Capital of the World
Posts: 7,687
|
I don't think so. Bombardment can be quite useful when properly done. It is great on the defense and when the enemy is not fortifed in a city. The arty and radar arty are good even then and allow you to safely soften up a target. Sure you can use aircraft for this but they have their limitations also.
__________________
"Perfection is attained, not when no more can be added, but when no more can be removed." The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way |
|
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2002, 02:45 PM
|
#3 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grankulla, Finland
Posts: 55
|
yes might be, but the thing that I wonder most if it would unbalance the game?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2002, 02:46 PM
|
#4 |
|
Yumbo? Yumbo!
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Snack Food Capital of the World
Posts: 7,687
|
Not if you never used them. For those of us who do , it would.
__________________
"Perfection is attained, not when no more can be added, but when no more can be removed." The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way |
|
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2002, 09:32 PM
|
#5 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massachusets
Posts: 81
|
Anyways Malachai u should try using bombard.
At first i didnt use it either but after i tried it, i cant live without it It reduces the city size (reducing the defensive bonus with it), it may dmg the units inside the city and chances of cultural flipping will b lot less since u will probably kill most of the citizens on the process |
|
|
|
|
Nov 12, 2002, 07:15 AM
|
#6 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 97
|
I like it the way it is, in Civ2 the modern day artillery made it extremely easy to crack cities.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 12, 2002, 09:58 AM
|
#7 |
|
M AS IN MARTINI
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,590
|
I like how bombardment on defense reduces your attacker.
 That's nifty.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Naval units attacking land units, Civ 2 style | Ringan | Civ4 - Creation & Customization | 7 | Feb 19, 2008 10:13 PM |
| Land Lethal Defensive Bombardment | Krikkitone | Civ3 - Creation & Customization | 9 | Sep 26, 2005 03:57 PM |
| 0 bombardment units | Sukenis | Civ3 - General Discussions | 3 | Nov 14, 2003 05:43 PM |
| Land, Air, and Sea Bombardment Theory IN Modern Age | one_man_assault | Civ3 Strategy Articles | 9 | Oct 10, 2003 06:57 PM |
| A review of land-based bombardment units and an idea for improvement! | DrJambo | Civ3 - General Discussions | 0 | May 09, 2002 06:20 AM |
|
