|
| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
 |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Oct 01, 2010, 05:22 AM
|
#1 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34
|
very high unit-maintenence for no reason
anyone else thinks unit maintenence is ridiculous? When building my fifth or sixth destroyer (emperor difficulty) my per-turn income decreases with 9 gold.......
I think: 1. Every gold yield should be increased by 1. 2. AI should be just as smart on diety as on settler... imo. |
|
|
|
Oct 01, 2010, 05:29 AM
|
#2 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 30
|
Trading post spam - Do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 01, 2010, 05:38 AM
|
#3 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 224
|
Do you own Destroyer personally? They must be pretty expensive to maintenance. 9 small pieces of gold (per. 10 years) seems a bargain.
__________________
leonel's comment to "older civ is always better than the new one, just like 4 is better than 5": Quote: "I still can't believe they added Spy units in Civ 2. Civilization died then!  "
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
