|
| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
 |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Feb 05, 2011, 06:23 PM
|
#1 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,296
|
Beware! 2k_The_J is on the warpath!
It may have come to the attention of some of you that the supervisor of moderators, 2K_Greg, honoured this subsidiary of the 2K forums with his presence during the last days.
Accordingly, to prove submissiveness, some potentially dangerous threads with heretical content had to be closed immediately. Should civ 5 have been called civ rev 2.0? Has opinion of the game changed, or the mix on the forum? Nothing Wrong With Civ 4 Vanilla Luckily, threads like Civ is like CRACK have been recognized to add many never before discussed topics to the forum. Unfortunately, due to time constraints (receiving orders) 2K_The_J has not yet been able to make above mentioned thread sticky. I regret this, but I am full of hope that he will do so in the next minutes. I am sure that 2K_The_J will have a very successful career in the future, as he knows when and what action of him is expected by superiors. 
|
|
|
Feb 05, 2011, 06:35 PM
|
#2 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 38
|
Someone sure is crabby at the moment. One thread was praising Civ 5 while another praised Civ 4. The third was about changing opinions good or bad. Can't understand the mods reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Feb 05, 2011, 06:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
Prince
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 476
|
Well. we're not supposed to discuss the mods, but he needs to get his PM working again. It's been months now and if he is going to drop the hammer all the time, there needs to be recourse or at least rebuttal/clarification opportunity.
|
|
|
|
Feb 05, 2011, 06:43 PM
|
#4 |
|
Lurker
   
|
Moderator Action: Thread closed.
We do not allow user-specific threads -- especially critical ones -- directed towards moderators, just as we do not allow such threads directed towards any user of this forum. If you have a complaint with a moderator's actions, please PM that mod. If he does not respond, please contact one of the many other Civ5 mods. Publicly criticizing a moderator isn't going to make him any more tolerant of your viewpoint. Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/faq.php?faq=updated_rules_2011 |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
