| General | Hosted Sites | Civ5 | CivRev | Civ4Col | Civ4 | Civ3 | Civ2 | Civ1 | Misc | Marketplace |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Chieftain
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 83
|
Success with Sitting Bull
I just had a very successful diety game using Sitting Bull as the civilization. It was my first time ever trying out the Native American civilization, and I was whipping some butt bigtime.
The philisophical trait kept my economy supercharged with great people, and I went bonkers on the dog soldiers early on. Anyone else do well with Sitting Bull? I think that he is overlooked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Warlord
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 116
|
Dogs are outright broken if you play on a difficulty where the AI doesn't start with archery.
And, yes. Phi is awesome for powering through the classical/medieval age tech-wise. Really there are only two bad things about Sitting Bull: 1. You cannot axe-rush on higher difficulty settings (which isn't that much of an issue as axe-rushes tend to suck at higher difficulties anyway). 2. Starting with fishing spoils the great scientist bulb path towards machinery, which is a crying shame for a leader who is otherwise so ideally set up for crossbow rushes. (You can still go the Oracle-engineer route, but that hinges on getting the Oracle wich is not always an option).
__________________
You claim to hold many virtues in high regard, yet your actions speak but one moral message: "The weak must suffer!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Prince
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
But if I want to do `great`... he`s not the first guy I would think of.
__________________
I'm not so think as you drunk I am. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hill Archers are OP!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 1,587
|
Sitting Bull is well known for XBow Rush on Deity and MP, at least I thought that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Deity Whipping Boy
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,123
|
He's possibly my least favourite. After sinking a trait and a UB (both contenders for the weakest) into better archery units I don't need a resourceless UU, and I'd usually prefer regular Axemen over Dogs.
Having it relatively easy to choke/disconnect others' resources supply would be nice if the axeman stand-in didn't prefer facing metal-dependent troops to facing archers. PHI is a very decent trait, but not enough to make me consider Sitting Bull good or even average. More acceptable on Deity than on any other level though.
__________________
You can't spell 'analysis' without 'anal'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deity
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 5,080
|
The resources UU also opens up some nice early wonder options on high levels that would otherwise be unavailable without a means to defend oneself . And PHI works nicely with early wonders .
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|